Literature DB >> 26482936

Dynamics of robust pattern separability in the hippocampal dentate gyrus.

Joel Zylberberg1,2, Robert A Hyde3, Ben W Strowbridge3.   

Abstract

The dentate gyrus (DG) is thought to perform pattern separation on inputs received from the entorhinal cortex, such that the DG forms distinct representations of different input patterns. Neuronal responses, however, are known to be variable, and that variability has the potential to confuse the representations of different inputs, thereby hindering the pattern separation function. This variability can be especially problematic for tissues such as the DG, in which the responses can persist for tens of seconds following stimulation: the long response duration allows for variability from many different sources to accumulate. To understand how the DG can robustly encode different input patterns, we investigated a recently developed in vitro hippocampal DG preparation that generates persistent responses to transient electrical stimulation. For 10-20 s after stimulation, the responses are indicative of the pattern of stimulation that was applied, even though the responses exhibit significant trial-to-trial variability. Analyzing the dynamical trajectories of the evoked responses, we found that, following stimulation, the neural responses follow distinct paths through the space of possible neural activations, with a different path associated with each stimulation pattern. The neural responses' trial-to-trial variability shifts the responses along these paths rather than between them, maintaining the separability of the input patterns. Manipulations that redistributed the variability more isotropically over the space of possible neural activations impeded the pattern separation function. Consequently, we conclude that the confinement of neuronal variability to these one-dimensional paths mitigates the impacts of variability on pattern encoding and, thus, may be an important aspect of the DG's ability to robustly encode input patterns.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dentate gyrus; intracellular; pattern separation; persistence; slice; variability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26482936      PMCID: PMC5546763          DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  22 in total

1.  Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus and CA3 of the hippocampus.

Authors:  Jill K Leutgeb; Stefan Leutgeb; May-Britt Moser; Edvard I Moser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  One-dimensional dynamics of attention and decision making in LIP.

Authors:  Surya Ganguli; James W Bisley; Jamie D Roitman; Michael N Shadlen; Michael E Goldberg; Kenneth D Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Bump attractor dynamics in prefrontal cortex explains behavioral precision in spatial working memory.

Authors:  Klaus Wimmer; Duane Q Nykamp; Christos Constantinidis; Albert Compte
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Electrophysiology of morphologically identified mossy cells of the dentate hilus recorded in guinea pig hippocampal slices.

Authors:  H E Scharfman; P A Schwartzkroin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: avoiding a trade-off.

Authors:  R C O'Reilly; J L McClelland
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Semilunar granule cells: glutamatergic neurons in the rat dentate gyrus with axon collaterals in the inner molecular layer.

Authors:  Philip A Williams; Phillip Larimer; Yuan Gao; Ben W Strowbridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Noise in the nervous system.

Authors:  A Aldo Faisal; Luc P J Selen; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Specific evidence of low-dimensional continuous attractor dynamics in grid cells.

Authors:  Kijung Yoon; Michael A Buice; Caswell Barry; Robin Hayman; Neil Burgess; Ila R Fiete
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  High-fidelity coding with correlated neurons.

Authors:  Rava Azeredo da Silveira; Michael J Berry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The sign rule and beyond: boundary effects, flexibility, and noise correlations in neural population codes.

Authors:  Yu Hu; Joel Zylberberg; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of Persistent Activity in Cortical Circuits: Possible Neural Substrates for Working Memory.

Authors:  Joel Zylberberg; Ben W Strowbridge
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Robust information propagation through noisy neural circuits.

Authors:  Joel Zylberberg; Alexandre Pouget; Peter E Latham; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Temporal pattern separation in hippocampal neurons through multiplexed neural codes.

Authors:  Antoine D Madar; Laura A Ewell; Mathew V Jones
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Pattern separation of spiketrains in hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  Antoine D Madar; Laura A Ewell; Mathew V Jones
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Re-evaluating Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Pattern Separation.

Authors:  N Alex Cayco-Gajic; R Angus Silver
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 17.173

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.