N Herregods1, J Dehoorne2, R Joos2, J L Jaremko3, X Baraliakos4, A Leus5, F Van den Bosch6, K Verstraete5, L Jans5. 1. Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Electronic address: Nele.Herregods@uzgent.be. 2. Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium. 3. Department of Radiology & Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta Hospital, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton T6G 2B7, Alberta, Canada. 4. Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649 Herne, Germany. 5. Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium. 6. Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Abstract
AIM: To determine the diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of sacroiliitis in juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of 80 paediatric patients who underwent MRI of the sacroiliac joints that were clinically suspected to have sacroiliitis. The prevalence of MRI features of active and structural lesions of sacroiliitis was recorded. Patients were classified according to the International League of Association for Rheumatology criteria. The MRI findings were compared to the final clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: Sacroiliitis was seen in 25/80 (31%) patients. MRI showed active inflammation in 23 patients (29%): synovial enhancement (28%), high short tau inversion recovery (STIR)-signal in the joint space (29%), bone marrow oedema (BMO; 20%), and capsulitis (8%). Structural changes were present in 14 patients (18%): erosion (14%), fat infiltration (13%), sclerosis (8%), and ankylosis (1%). Of all MRI features, ankylosis (100%), capsulitis (98%), BMO (96%), and erosion (96%) had the highest specificity for JSpA; global diagnostic impression (55%) and synovial enhancement (52%) were the MRI features with the highest sensitivity. The likelihood ratios (LR+) for diagnosis of JSpA were high for BMO (10.5), capsulitis (7.5), global diagnostic impression (6.9), and erosions (6.75), but greater for BMO concomitant with synovial enhancement (LR+ 19.5) and for erosion concomitant with BMO (LR+ 12) or synovial enhancement (LR+ 13.5). CONCLUSION: There are multiple features of active inflammation and structural damage visible at MRI of the sacroiliac joints that can provide a specific diagnosis of JSpA when present in children with suspected sacroiliitis. Synovial enhancement is the MRI feature with the highest sensitivity for JSpA. If BMO is seen concomitant with synovial enhancement or erosion, the diagnosis of JSpA is very likely. Ankylosis, capsulitis, bone marrow oedema, and erosion all have a high specificity for JSpA. Absence of MRI findings of sacroiliitis does not exclude the diagnosis of JSpA.
AIM: To determine the diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of sacroiliitis in juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of 80 paediatric patients who underwent MRI of the sacroiliac joints that were clinically suspected to have sacroiliitis. The prevalence of MRI features of active and structural lesions of sacroiliitis was recorded. Patients were classified according to the International League of Association for Rheumatology criteria. The MRI findings were compared to the final clinical diagnosis. RESULTS:Sacroiliitis was seen in 25/80 (31%) patients. MRI showed active inflammation in 23 patients (29%): synovial enhancement (28%), high short tau inversion recovery (STIR)-signal in the joint space (29%), bone marrow oedema (BMO; 20%), and capsulitis (8%). Structural changes were present in 14 patients (18%): erosion (14%), fat infiltration (13%), sclerosis (8%), and ankylosis (1%). Of all MRI features, ankylosis (100%), capsulitis (98%), BMO (96%), and erosion (96%) had the highest specificity for JSpA; global diagnostic impression (55%) and synovial enhancement (52%) were the MRI features with the highest sensitivity. The likelihood ratios (LR+) for diagnosis of JSpA were high for BMO (10.5), capsulitis (7.5), global diagnostic impression (6.9), and erosions (6.75), but greater for BMO concomitant with synovial enhancement (LR+ 19.5) and for erosion concomitant with BMO (LR+ 12) or synovial enhancement (LR+ 13.5). CONCLUSION: There are multiple features of active inflammation and structural damage visible at MRI of the sacroiliac joints that can provide a specific diagnosis of JSpA when present in children with suspected sacroiliitis. Synovial enhancement is the MRI feature with the highest sensitivity for JSpA. If BMO is seen concomitant with synovial enhancement or erosion, the diagnosis of JSpA is very likely. Ankylosis, capsulitis, bone marrow oedema, and erosion all have a high specificity for JSpA. Absence of MRI findings of sacroiliitis does not exclude the diagnosis of JSpA.
Authors: Nele Herregods; Lennart B O Jans; Min Chen; Joel Paschke; Stefanie L De Buyser; Thomas Renson; Joke Dehoorne; Rik Joos; Robert G W Lambert; Jacob L Jaremko Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Pamela F Weiss; Rui Xiao; Timothy G Brandon; David M Biko; Walter P Maksymowych; Robert G Lambert; Jacob L Jaremko; Nancy A Chauvin Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Robert Hemke; Nele Herregods; Jacob L Jaremko; Gunnar Åström; Derk Avenarius; Fabio Becce; Dennis K Bielecki; Mikael Boesen; Danoob Dalili; Chiara Giraudo; Kay-Geert Hermann; Paul Humphries; Amanda Isaac; Anne Grethe Jurik; Andrea S Klauser; Ola Kvist; Frederiek Laloo; Mario Maas; Adam Mester; Edwin Oei; Amaka C Offiah; Patrick Omoumi; Olympia Papakonstantinou; Athena Plagou; Susan Shelmerdine; Paolo Simoni; Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Laura Tanturri de Horatio; James Teh; Lennart Jans; Karen Rosendahl Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 5.315