Literature DB >> 2648087

The ownership of health facilities and clinical decisionmaking. The case of the ESRD industry.

M Schlesinger1, P D Cleary, D Blumenthal.   

Abstract

The growth of investor-owned health care facilities raises questions about the relationship between profit seeking and medical decisionmaking. The authors compared the treatment received by patients with end-stage renal disease in private nonprofit, for-profit, and public facilities. Using data collected by the Health Care Financing Administration in 1981, they found that facility ownership had a significant independent effect on treatment of renal failure. In particular, patients at for-profit facilities were more likely to be dialyzed in the center and less likely to receive kidney transplants, home dialysis, or peritoneal dialysis than were their counterparts in nonprofit and public facilities. These findings persisted after controlling for characteristics of patients, the facility, and the local health care system, suggesting the need for further research and policy initiatives to deal with this issue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; End Stage Renal Disease Program; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2648087     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198903000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  10 in total

1.  A national study of efficiency for dialysis centers: an examination of market competition and facility characteristics for production of multiple dialysis outputs.

Authors:  Hacer Ozgen; Yasar A Ozcan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The Ethics of Chronic Dialysis for the Older Patient: Time to Reevaluate the Norms.

Authors:  Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Keith M Swetz; Robert C Albright
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Profit-seeking, corporate control, and the trustworthiness of health care organizations: assessments of health plan performance by their affiliated physicians.

Authors:  Mark Schlesinger; Nicole Quon; Matthew Wynia; Deborah Cummins; Bradford Gray
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Predictors of chain acquisition among independent dialysis facilities.

Authors:  Alyssa S Pozniak; Richard A Hirth; Jane Banaszak-Holl; John R C Wheeler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Dialysis in the frail elderly--a current ethical problem, an impending ethical crisis.

Authors:  Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Keith M Swetz; Jon C Tilburt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Using subjective health assessments in practice and policy-making.

Authors:  G Albrecht
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1996-11

7.  Geographic and temporal trends in peritoneal dialysis services in the United States between 1995 and 2003.

Authors:  Virginia Wang; Shoou-Yih D Lee; Uptal D Patel; Bryan J Weiner; Thomas C Ricketts; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Factors associated with hospitalization in a sample of chronic hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  K R Jones
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Factors affecting the availability and use of hemodialysis facilities.

Authors:  P D Cleary; M Schlesinger; D Blumenthal
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1991

10.  Comparative mortality of hemodialysis patients at for-profit and not-for-profit dialysis facilities in the United States, 1998 to 2003: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Robert N Foley; Qiao Fan; Jiannong Liu; David T Gilbertson; Eric D Weinhandl; Shu-Cheng Chen; Allan J Collins
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 2.388

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.