Literature DB >> 10163999

Using subjective health assessments in practice and policy-making.

G Albrecht1.   

Abstract

This paper discusses the use of subjective health assessment in medical practice and social policy-making. The importance of recognising patients' perceptions of their health when attempting to improve patient-practitioner relationships and formulate effective health care policies is stressed. The paper describes some of the tensions that exist between objective and subjective assessments of health. It is argued that there is a need for unifying theory to underpin the use of subjective health perceptions. Suggestions are made for the effective employment of these indicators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10163999     DOI: 10.1007/BF02249315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  30 in total

1.  Clinical markers of asthma severity and risk: importance of subjective as well as objective factors.

Authors:  S Janson-Bjerklie; S Ferketich; P Benner; G Becker
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.210

Review 2.  Instruments for the functional assessment of older patients.

Authors:  W B Applegate; J P Blass; T F Williams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-04-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Strategies for improving and expanding the application of health status measures in clinical settings. A researcher-developer viewpoint.

Authors:  R A Deyo; W B Carter
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Competition and the quality of care: the importance of information.

Authors:  P B Ginsburg; G T Hammons
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; L B Berman; M Townsend; S O Pugsley; L W Chambers
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 6.  Health-related quality-of-life assessment in medical care.

Authors:  A J McSweeny; T L Creer
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.800

7.  Using proxies to evaluate quality of life. Can they provide valid information about patients' health status and satisfaction with medical care?

Authors:  A M Epstein; J A Hall; J Tognetti; L H Son; L Conant
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  A randomized trial of psychosocial support during high-risk pregnancies. The Latin American Network for Perinatal and Reproductive Research.

Authors:  J Villar; U Farnot; F Barros; C Victora; A Langer; J M Belizan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-10-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Arthritis and perceptions of quality of life: an examination of positive and negative affect in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Authors:  A J Zautra; M H Burleson; C A Smith; S J Blalock; K A Wallston; R F DeVellis; B M DeVellis; T W Smith
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.267

10.  The validity of proxy-generated scores as measures of patient health status.

Authors:  M L Rothman; S C Hedrick; K A Bulcroft; D H Hickam; L Z Rubenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: an appraisal and precept for future research and application.

Authors:  James W Varni; Tasha M Burwinkle; Mariella M Lane
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 3.186

2.  Sexual knowledge and victimization in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  S M Brown-Lavoie; M A Viecili; J A Weiss
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.