Literature DB >> 26480326

Initiation of universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients as a model for the implementation of genetic information into clinical oncology practice.

Stacey A Cohen1,2, Mercy Laurino3,4,5, Deborah J Bowen6, Melissa P Upton7, Colin Pritchard8, Fuki Hisama3, Gail Jarvik3,9, Alessandro Fichera10, Britta Sjoding4, Robin L Bennett3,4, Lorraine Naylor3,4, Angela Jacobson8, Wylie Burke6, William M Grady2,5,11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome confers a hereditary predisposition to colorectal and other cancers. Universal tumor screening (UTS) for Lynch syndrome is recommended by several professional societies, but the implementation can be complex. This article describes the evaluation, process development, and initiation of Lynch syndrome UTS at a tertiary referral cancer center.
METHODS: A multidisciplinary team developed the new process design. Issues in 5 themes were noted: timing, funding, second-opinion patients, result processing, and the role of genetics providers. A committee approach was used to examine each issue for process-improvement development.
RESULTS: The issues related to testing were addressed individually for the successful implementation of UTS at the institutional level. In the conventional-care period, 9 of 30 cases (30%) received Lynch syndrome screening, and 4 cases were referred to medical genetics. During the 6 months following the implementation of UTS, 32 of 44 patients (73%) received Lynch syndrome screening. The 13 unscreened patients all had identified reasons for nonscreening (eg, financial limitations). Ten patients were referred to medical genetics, which identified no new cases of Lynch syndrome, but a low-risk adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) variant was detected in 1 individual.
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of effective Lynch syndrome UTS can feasibly alter practice at the institutional level. This experience with the assessment and management of issues relevant to the successful implementation of a new clinical care paradigm based on emerging technology has implications for the uptake of advances across molecular oncology into clinical practice, and this is highly relevant in the current era of rapidly evolving genomic technology.
© 2015 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lynch syndrome; genetics; genomics; microsatellite instability; molecular oncology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26480326      PMCID: PMC4724321          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  23 in total

1.  Collaboration Between Surgeons and Medical Oncologists and Outcomes for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Tanvir Hussain; Hsien-Yen Chang; Christine M Veenstra; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Population-based universal screening for Lynch syndrome: ready, set... How?

Authors:  Joanne Ngeow; Charis Eng
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  A guiding framework and approach for implementation research in substance use disorders treatment.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; Hildi J Hagedorn
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2011-06

4.  New clinical criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome) proposed by the International Collaborative group on HNPCC.

Authors:  H F Vasen; P Watson; J P Mecklin; H T Lynch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Toward a consensus in molecular diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome).

Authors:  Henry T Lynch; Jane F Lynch; Patrick M Lynch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Population-Based Lynch Syndrome Screening by Microsatellite Instability in Patients ≤50: Prevalence, Testing Determinants, and Result Availability Prior to Colon Surgery.

Authors:  Jordan J Karlitz; Mei-Chin Hsieh; Yong Liu; Christine Blanton; Beth Schmidt; J Milburn Jessup; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Vivien W Chen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 8.  Surgical treatment of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, Lynch syndrome).

Authors:  Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Gabriela Möeslein
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 9.  Closing the gap between knowledge and clinical application: challenges for genomic translation.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Diane M Korngiebel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mercy Mvundura; Scott D Grosse; Heather Hampel; Glenn E Palomaki
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  10 in total

1.  Management strategies in Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis: a national healthcare survey in Japan.

Authors:  Tomoki Yamano; Michiko Hamanaka; Akihito Babaya; Kei Kimura; Masayoshi Kobayashi; Miki Fukumoto; Kiyoshi Tsukamoto; Masafumi Noda; Nagahide Matsubara; Naohiro Tomita; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.716

2.  A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification.

Authors:  Alessia Tognetto; Maria Benedetta Michelazzo; Giovanna Elisa Calabró; Brigid Unim; Marco Di Marco; Walter Ricciardi; Roberta Pastorino; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-09-12

3.  Impact of Different Selection Approaches for Identifying Lynch Syndrome-Related Colorectal Cancer Patients: Unity Is Strength.

Authors:  Daniele Fanale; Lidia Rita Corsini; Chiara Brando; Alessandra Dimino; Clarissa Filorizzo; Luigi Magrin; Roberta Sciacchitano; Alessia Fiorino; Tancredi Didier Bazan Russo; Valentina Calò; Juan Lucio Iovanna; Edoardo Francini; Antonio Russo; Viviana Bazan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Identifying patients with Lynch syndrome using a universal tumor screening program in an integrated healthcare system.

Authors:  Philip R Crain; Jamilyn M Zepp; Sara Gille; Lindsay Jenkins; Tia L Kauffman; Elizabeth Shuster; Katrina A B Goddard; Benjamin S Wilfond; Jessica Ezzell Hunter
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.164

5.  Barriers and Facilitators to Adoption of Genomic Services for Colorectal Care within the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Nina R Sperber; Sara M Andrews; Corrine I Voils; Gregory L Green; Dawn Provenzale; Sara Knight
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2016-04-28

6.  Patient and provider perspectives on adherence to and care coordination of lynch syndrome surveillance recommendations: findings from qualitative interviews.

Authors:  Jennifer L Schneider; Katrina A B Goddard; Kristin R Muessig; James V Davis; Alan F Rope; Jessica E Hunter; Susan K Peterson; Louise S Acheson; Sapna Syngal; Georgia L Wiesner; Jacob A Reiss
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 7.  Evaluating the role of public health in implementation of genomics-related recommendations: a case study of hereditary cancers using the CDC Science Impact Framework.

Authors:  Ridgely Fisk Green; Mary Ari; Katherine Kolor; W David Dotson; Scott Bowen; Nancy Habarta; Juan L Rodriguez; Lisa C Richardson; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Mismatch repair protein loss in breast cancer: clinicopathological associations in a large British Columbia cohort.

Authors:  Angela S Cheng; Samuel C Y Leung; Dongxia Gao; Samantha Burugu; Meenakshi Anurag; Matthew J Ellis; Torsten O Nielsen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  The design, implementation, and effectiveness of intervention strategies aimed at improving genetic referral practices: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  April Morrow; Priscilla Chan; Katherine M Tucker; Natalie Taylor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Which Lynch syndrome screening programs could be implemented in the "real world"? A systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Marco Di Marco; Elvira DAndrea; Nikola Panic; Valentina Baccolini; Giuseppe Migliara; Carolina Marzuillo; Corrado De Vito; Roberta Pastorino; Stefania Boccia; Paolo Villari
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.