Hugh Bostock1,2. 1. MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom. 2. Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scans are detailed stimulus-response curves which provide information about motor unit properties in neuromuscular disorders. This study assessed a method of automatic motor unit number estimation (MUNE) from 5-min CMAP scans. METHODS: A preliminary model, derived from the variance and slope of the scan, is refined to fit the CMAP scan more closely. The method was tested by application to 60 simulated scans, generated from between 5 and 160 motor unit potentials. RESULTS: The fitting procedure took an average of 1.5 min on a standard personal computer. Small unit numbers (5-20) were on average correctly estimated, but large unit numbers (>40) were slightly underestimated. Overall, the absolute MUNE error averaged 6.9%. CONCLUSIONS: This new MUNE method takes all excitable motor units into account and provides realistic estimates of unit numbers over the range 5 to 160. Validation as a clinical tool awaits further study. Muscle Nerve 53: 889-896, 2016.
INTRODUCTION: Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scans are detailed stimulus-response curves which provide information about motor unit properties in neuromuscular disorders. This study assessed a method of automatic motor unit number estimation (MUNE) from 5-min CMAP scans. METHODS: A preliminary model, derived from the variance and slope of the scan, is refined to fit the CMAP scan more closely. The method was tested by application to 60 simulated scans, generated from between 5 and 160 motor unit potentials. RESULTS: The fitting procedure took an average of 1.5 min on a standard personal computer. Small unit numbers (5-20) were on average correctly estimated, but large unit numbers (>40) were slightly underestimated. Overall, the absolute MUNE error averaged 6.9%. CONCLUSIONS: This new MUNE method takes all excitable motor units into account and provides realistic estimates of unit numbers over the range 5 to 160. Validation as a clinical tool awaits further study. Muscle Nerve 53: 889-896, 2016.
Authors: James Howells; José Manuel Matamala; Susanna B Park; Nidhi Garg; Steve Vucic; Hugh Bostock; David Burke; Matthew C Kiernan Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Nick S Verber; Stephanie R Shepheard; Matilde Sassani; Harry E McDonough; Sophie A Moore; James J P Alix; Iain D Wilkinson; Tom M Jenkins; Pamela J Shaw Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Matthew G Birkbeck; Andrew M Blamire; Roger G Whittaker; Avan Aihie Sayer; Richard M Dodds Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 12.910
Authors: Steve Vucic; Matthew C Kiernan; Parvathi Menon; William Huynh; Austin Rynders; Karen S Ho; Robert Glanzman; Michael T Hotchkin Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Emilio Geijo-Barrientos; Carlos Pastore-Olmedo; Pedro De Mingo; Miguel Blanquer; Joaquín Gómez Espuch; Francisca Iniesta; Natalia García Iniesta; Ana García-Hernández; Carlos Martín-Estefanía; Laura Barrios; José M Moraleda; Salvador Martínez Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 4.677