Literature DB >> 26478829

Portrayal of medical decision making around medical interventions life-saving encounters on three medical television shows.

Rebecca J Schwei1, Elizabeth A Jacobs2, Katherine Wingert3, Enid Montague4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous literature has shown that patients obtain information about the medical system from television shows. Additionally, shared decision making is regularly cited as the ideal way to make decisions during a medical encounter. Little information exists surrounding the characteristics of medical decision-making, such as who makes the decision, on medical television shows. We evaluate the characteristics of medical decisions in lifesaving encounters on medical television shows and evaluate if these characteristics were different on staged and reality television shows.
METHODS: We coded type of medical intervention, patient's ability to participate in decision, presence of patient advocate during decision, final decision maker, decision to use intervention, and controversy surrounding decision on three television shows. Frequencies by show were calculated and differences across the three television shows and between staged (ER) and reality (BostonMed and Hopkins) television shows were assessed with chi-square tests.
RESULTS: The final data set included 37 episodes, 137 patients and 593 interventions. On ER, providers were significantly more likely to make the decision about the medical intervention without informing the patient when a patient was capable of making a decision compared to BostonMed or Hopkins (p<0.001). Across all shows, 99% of all decisions on whether to use a medical intervention resulted in the use of that intervention. DISCUSSION: Medical interventions are widely portrayed in the medical television shows we analyzed. It is possible that what patients see on television influences their expectations surrounding the decision making process and the use of medical interventions in everyday healthcare encounters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision Making; Medical Interventions; Medical Television Shows

Year:  2015        PMID: 26478829      PMCID: PMC4605439          DOI: 10.1007/s12553-015-0107-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol (Berl)        ISSN: 2190-7196


  13 in total

1.  The health professional-patient-relationship in conventional versus complementary and alternative medicine. A qualitative study comparing the perceived use of medical shared decision-making between two different approaches of medicine.

Authors:  Stephanie Berger; Elmar Braehler; Jochen Ernst
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-02-10

2.  Television entertainment and the US health-care debate.

Authors:  J Turow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-05-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Models for ethical medicine in a revolutionary age. What physician-patient roles foster the most ethical realtionship?

Authors:  R M Veatch
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television. Miracles and misinformation.

Authors:  S J Diem; J D Lantos; J A Tulsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Sex, money, and bioethics. Watching ER and Chicago Hope.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

6.  Educating the elderly: cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions before and after intervention.

Authors:  R S Schonwetter; T A Teasdale; G Taffet; B E Robinson; R J Luchi
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 7.  An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters.

Authors:  Gregory Makoul; Marla L Clayman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-07-26

8.  Resuscitation decision making in the elderly: the value of outcome data.

Authors:  R S Schonwetter; R M Walker; D R Kramer; B E Robinson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Partnerships in patient care: a contractual approach.

Authors:  T E Quill
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Interaction between participants in focus groups with older patients and general practitioners.

Authors:  Janne Moen; Karolina Antonov; J Lars G Nilsson; Lena Ring
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2009-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.