Literature DB >> 26478637

QUANTIFIERS UNDONE: REVERSING PREDICTABLE SPEECH ERRORS IN COMPREHENSION.

Lyn Frazier1, Charles Clifton1.   

Abstract

Speakers predictably make errors during spontaneous speech. Listeners may identify such errors and repair the input, or their analysis of the input, accordingly. Two written questionnaire studies investigated error compensation mechanisms in sentences with doubled quantifiers such as Many students often turn in their assignments late. Results show a considerable number of undoubled interpretations for all items tested (though fewer for sentences containing doubled negation than for sentences containing many-often, every-always or few-seldom.) This evidence shows that the compositional form-meaning pairing supplied by the grammar is not the only systematic mapping between form and meaning. Implicit knowledge of the workings of the performance systems provides an additional mechanism for pairing sentence form and meaning. Alternate accounts of the data based on either a concord interpretation or an emphatic interpretation of the doubled quantifier don't explain why listeners fail to apprehend the 'extra meaning' added by the potentially redundant material only in limited circumstances.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 26478637      PMCID: PMC4608021          DOI: 10.1353/lan.2011.0024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Language (Baltim)        ISSN: 0097-8507


  4 in total

1.  Practice effects on speech production planning: evidence from slips of the tongue in spontaneous vs. preplanned speech in Japanese.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kawachi
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-07

2.  Processing Elided Verb Phrases with Flawed Antecedents: the Recycling Hypothesis.

Authors:  Ana Arregui; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier; Keir Moulton
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.059

  4 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Two interpretive systems for natural language?

Authors:  Lyn Frazier
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-02

2.  The Role of Non-Actuality Implicatures in Processing Elided Constituents.

Authors:  Margaret Grant; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Without his shirt off he saved the child from almost drowning: interpreting an uncertain input.

Authors:  Lyn Frazier; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  (Not) Hearing Optional Subjects: The Effects of Pragmatic Usage Preferences.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier; Patrick V Taylor
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Do Null Subjects (mis-)Trigger Pro-drop Grammars?

Authors:  Lyn Frazier
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-12

6.  Relating (Un)acceptability to Interpretation. Experimental Investigations on Negation.

Authors:  Urtzi Etxeberria; Susagna Tubau; Viviane Deprez; Joan Borràs-Comes; M Teresa Espinal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.