Literature DB >> 26477789

The relationship between perineural invasion, tumor grade, reactive stroma and prostate cancer-specific mortality: A clinicopathologic study on a population-based cohort.

Thorstein Saeter1,2, Mari Bogaard1, Ljiljana Vlatkovic3, Gudmund Waaler2, Einar Servoll2, Jahn M Nesland1,3, Karol Axcrona4, Ulrika Axcrona3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that nerves, tumor epithelium, and stroma interact and promote prostate cancer (PC) progression. Perineural invasion (PNI) is established amidst these interactions and may therefore indicate an aggressive PC phenotype. The purpose of the present study was to determine the relationship between PNI, tumor grade, reactive stroma, and PC-specific mortality.
METHODS: A population-based study on 318 patients, encompassing all cases of PC diagnosed by needle biopsies and without evidence of systemic metastasis at the time of diagnosis in Aust-Agder County in the period of 1991-1999. Patients were identified by cross-referencing the Cancer Registry of Norway. Clinical data were obtained by review of medical charts. Diagnostic prostate needle biopsies were reviewed with respect to presence of PNI, percentage of biopsy cores with PNI, Gleason score (GS), and reactive stromal grade (RSG). The endpoint was PC-specific mortality.
RESULTS: The presence of PNI was significantly associated with high tumor grade and abundant reactive stroma. The 10-year PC-specific survival for patients with and without PNI was 72% and 91%, respectively (P = 0.001, log rank). PNI predicted PC-specific mortality independently of clinical factors, though the effect of PNI was attenuated when adjusting for GS and RSG. However, a percentage of biopsy cores with PNI >50% was found to predict PC-specific mortality independently of other clinicopathologic parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: The present population-based study shows that PNI on diagnostic prostate needle biopsy is associated with increased risk of PC-specific mortality. Our findings demonstrate that the prognostic effect of PNI is dependent on an association with high grade carcinoma and reactive stroma. However; the impact of PNI on clinical outcome becomes stronger and independent of other clinicopathologic factors upon increased percentage of PNI positive biopsy cores. Thus, our study highlights the importance of PNI and microenvironmental interactions for the long-term outcome of PC.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason score; biopsy; mortality; perineural invasion; prostate cancer; reactive stroma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26477789     DOI: 10.1002/pros.23112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  9 in total

1.  The value of multimodality imaging in the investigation of a PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy in the Irish hospital setting.

Authors:  L C McLoughlin; S Inder; D Moran; C O'Rourke; R P Manecksha; T H Lynch
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Tumour innervation and neurosignalling in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brayden March; Sam Faulkner; Phillip Jobling; Allison Steigler; Alison Blatt; Jim Denham; Hubert Hondermarck
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Prognostic Value of Perineural Invasion in Resected Gastric Cancer Patients According to Lauren Histotype.

Authors:  Lorenzo De Franco; Daniele Marrelli; Costantino Voglino; Carla Vindigni; Francesco Ferrara; Giulio Di Mare; Livio Iudici; Mario Marini; Franco Roviello
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Tumor budding as a prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ekaterina Petrova; Verena Zielinski; Louisa Bolm; Cleopatra Schreiber; Juliana Knief; Christoph Thorns; Peter Bronsert; Sylvia Timme-Bronsert; Dirk Bausch; Sven Perner; Tobias Keck; Ulrich Wellner
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Impact of uni- or multifocal perineural invasion in prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alessandro Sciarra; Martina Maggi; Arianna Del Proposto; Fabio Massimo Magliocca; Antonio Ciardi; Valeria Panebianco; Ettore De Berardinis; Stefano Salciccia; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Alessandro Gentilucci; Alex M Kasman; Benjamin I Chung; Matteo Ferro; Ottavio de Cobelli; Francesco Del Giudice; Gian Maria Busetto; Michele Gallucci; Marco Frisenda
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-01

6.  Perineural Invasion in Vulvar Squamous-Cell Carcinoma Is an Independent Risk Factor for Cancer-Specific Survival, but Not for Locoregional Recurrence: Results from a Single Tertiary Referral Center.

Authors:  Leonardo Micheletti; Fulvio Borella; Mario Preti; Valentina Frau; Stefano Cosma; Sebastiana Privitera; Luca Bertero; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  The Role of Perineural Invasion in Prostate Cancer and Its Prognostic Significance.

Authors:  Yuequn Niu; Sarah Förster; Michael Muders
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 8.  Cilia in autophagy and cancer.

Authors:  Muqing Cao; Qing Zhong
Journal:  Cilia       Date:  2016-02-03

9.  Should reporting of peri-neural invasion and extra prostatic extension be mandatory in prostate cancer biopsies? correlation with outcome in biopsy cases treated conservatively.

Authors:  Amar S Ahmad; Vishnu Parameshwaran; Luis Beltran; Gabrielle Fisher; Bernard V North; David Greenberg; Geraldine Soosay; Henrik Møller; Peter Scardino; Jack Cuzick; Daniel M Berney
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.