Literature DB >> 26476663

Significant increase in prostatectomy and decrease in radiation for clinical T3 prostate cancer from 1998 to 2012.

Michelle D Nezolosky1, Kathryn T Dinh2, Vinayak Muralidhar2, Brandon A Mahal3, Yu-Wei Chen4, Clair J Beard5, Toni K Choueiri6, Neil E Martin5, Christopher J Sweeney6, Quoc-Dien Trinh7, Paul L Nguyen8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to describe changes in treatment patterns for clinical T3 prostate cancer (PCa) from 1998 to 2012, specifically investigating what factors influence receipt of prostatectomy or radiation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we studied 11,604 men with clinical T3N0M0 PCa from 1998 to 2012, with treatment categorized as radiation, radical prostatectomy (RP), or no curative therapy. We calculated rate of treatment type by year of diagnosis to investigate trends in treatment patterns, further stratifying by clinical T3a, defined as unilateral and bilateral extracapsular extension (n = 3,842), vs. T3b (defined as extension to seminal vesicles (n = 3,665). Finally, a multivariable logistic regression analysis measured association of demographic and clinical variables with type of treatment received for years 2010 to 2011.
RESULTS: Rates of prostatectomy increased significantly from 1998 to 2012 (12.5% vs. 44.4%), radiation decreased significantly (55.8% vs. 38.4%), and receipt of no treatment also decreased (31.7% vs. 17.2%, all P<0.001). These trends were similar for clinical T3a and T3b. Rates of prostatectomy surpassed radiation by 2008 in clinical T3a, reaching 49.8% vs. 37.1%, respectively, in 2012 (P = 0.002), and were statistically similar to radiation in 2012 for clinical T3b, reaching 41.6% vs. 42.1% (P = 0.92). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patients were less likely to receive prostatectomy than radiation if biopsy Gleason scores of 8 to 10 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.41, 0.32-0.53), higher initial prostate-specific antigen (AOR = 0.97, 0.97-0.98), and older age (AOR = 0.92, 0.90-0.03, all P<0.01). The likelihood of RP was similar among cT3b vs. cT3a (AOR = 0.95, 0.71-1.26, P = 0.74).
CONCLUSIONS: Since 1998, there has been a significant increase in the use of RP for clinical T3 PCa and a significant decrease in the use of radiation such that in 2012, the use of prostatectomy exceeded the use of radiation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical T3 disease; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Radiation therapy; Treatment patterns

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26476663     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  5 in total

1.  Active Surveillance in Younger Men With Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael S Leapman; Janet E Cowan; Hao G Nguyen; Katsuto K Shinohara; Nannette Perez; Matthew R Cooperberg; William J Catalona; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Prostate cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): Findings from the CONCORD-2 study.

Authors:  C Brooke Steele; Jun Li; Bin Huang; Hannah K Weir
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  The very-high-risk prostate cancer: a contemporary update.

Authors:  R Mano; J Eastham; O Yossepowitch
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.554

4.  The Effect of Evolving Strategies in the Surgical Management of Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Data from 2005 to 2014 in a Multicenter Setting.

Authors:  Margit Pohle; Ahmed Magheli; Tom Fischer; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Jonas Busch; Hannes Cash; Kurt Miller; Stefan Hinz
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Comparison of hypofractionation and standard fractionation for post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy in patients with persistent PSA: single institution experience.

Authors:  Jure Murgic; Blanka Jaksic; Marin Prpic; Davor Kust; Amit Bahl; Mirjana Budanec; Angela Prgomet Secan; Pierfrancesco Franco; Ivan Kruljac; Borislav Spajic; Nenad Babic; Bozo Kruslin; Mario Zovak; Eduardo Zubizarreta; Eduardo Rosenblatt; Ana Fröbe
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.481

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.