C Brooke Steele1, Jun Li1, Bin Huang2, Hannah K Weir1. 1. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Markey Cancer Center, Kentucky Cancer Registry, and College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 5-year relative survival for prostate cancers diagnosed between 1990 and 1994 in the United States was very high (92%); however, survival in black males was 7% lower compared with white males. The authors updated these findings and examined survival by stage and race. METHODS: The authors used data from the CONCORD-2 study for males (ages 15-99 years) who were diagnosed with prostate cancer in 37 states, covering 80% of the US population. Survival was adjusted for background mortality (net survival) using state-specific and race-specific life tables and was age-standardized. Data were presented for 2001 through 2003 and 2004 through 2009 to account for changes in collecting SEER Summary Stage 2000. RESULTS: Among the 1,527,602 prostate cancers diagnosed between 2001 and 2009, the proportion of localized cases increased from 73% to 77% in black males and from 77% to 79% in white males. Although the proportion of distant-stage cases was higher among black males than among white males, they represented less than 6% of cases in both groups between 2004 and 2009. Net survival exceeded 99% for localized stage between 2004 and 2009 in both racial groups. Overall, and in most states, 5-year net survival exceeded 95%. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer survival has increased since the first CONCORD study, and the racial gap has narrowed. Earlier detection of localized cancers likely contributed to this finding. However, racial disparities also were observed in overall survival. To help understand which factors might contribute to the persistence of this disparity, states could use local data to explore sociodemographic characteristics, such as survivors' health insurance status, health literacy, treatment decision-making processes, and treatment preferences. Cancer 2017;123:5160-77. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
BACKGROUND: The 5-year relative survival for prostate cancers diagnosed between 1990 and 1994 in the United States was very high (92%); however, survival in black males was 7% lower compared with white males. The authors updated these findings and examined survival by stage and race. METHODS: The authors used data from the CONCORD-2 study for males (ages 15-99 years) who were diagnosed with prostate cancer in 37 states, covering 80% of the US population. Survival was adjusted for background mortality (net survival) using state-specific and race-specific life tables and was age-standardized. Data were presented for 2001 through 2003 and 2004 through 2009 to account for changes in collecting SEER Summary Stage 2000. RESULTS: Among the 1,527,602 prostate cancers diagnosed between 2001 and 2009, the proportion of localized cases increased from 73% to 77% in black males and from 77% to 79% in white males. Although the proportion of distant-stage cases was higher among black males than among white males, they represented less than 6% of cases in both groups between 2004 and 2009. Net survival exceeded 99% for localized stage between 2004 and 2009 in both racial groups. Overall, and in most states, 5-year net survival exceeded 95%. CONCLUSIONS:Prostate cancer survival has increased since the first CONCORD study, and the racial gap has narrowed. Earlier detection of localized cancers likely contributed to this finding. However, racial disparities also were observed in overall survival. To help understand which factors might contribute to the persistence of this disparity, states could use local data to explore sociodemographic characteristics, such as survivors' health insurance status, health literacy, treatment decision-making processes, and treatment preferences. Cancer 2017;123:5160-77. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
Epidemiology; Surveillance; and End Results (SEER) summary stage; cancer registries; early detection of cancer; population-based survival; prevention and control; prostate cancer; therapeutics; trends
Authors: Richard M Hoffman; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Kimberly M Davis; Tania Lobo; George Luta; Jun Shan; David Aaronson; David F Penson; Amethyst D Leimpeter; Kathryn L Taylor Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Gabriel A Brooks; Ling Li; Dhruv B Sharma; Jane C Weeks; Michael J Hassett; K Robin Yabroff; Deborah Schrag Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Claudia Allemani; Rhea Harewood; Christopher J Johnson; Helena Carreira; Devon Spika; Audrey Bonaventure; Kevin Ward; Hannah K Weir; Michel P Coleman Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Daniel J Lee; Katherine Mallin; Amy J Graves; Sam S Chang; David F Penson; Matthew J Resnick; Daniel A Barocas Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Michel P Coleman; Manuela Quaresma; Franco Berrino; Jean-Michel Lutz; Roberta De Angelis; Riccardo Capocaccia; Paolo Baili; Bernard Rachet; Gemma Gatta; Timo Hakulinen; Andrea Micheli; Milena Sant; Hannah K Weir; J Mark Elwood; Hideaki Tsukuma; Sergio Koifman; Gulnar Azevedo E Silva; Silvia Francisci; Mariano Santaquilani; Arduino Verdecchia; Hans H Storm; John L Young Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Chai Hong Rim; Won Sup Yoon; Jung Ae Lee; Dae Sik Yang; Nam Kwon Lee; Young Je Park; Chul Yong Kim Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Claudia Allemani; Rhea Harewood; Christopher J Johnson; Helena Carreira; Devon Spika; Audrey Bonaventure; Kevin Ward; Hannah K Weir; Michel P Coleman Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Thomas B Richards; S Jane Henley; Mary C Puckett; Hannah K Weir; Bin Huang; Thomas C Tucker; Claudia Allemani Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Emily M Rencsok; Latifa A Bazzi; Rana R McKay; Franklin W Huang; Adam Friedant; Jake Vinson; Samuel Peisch; Jelani C Zarif; Stacey Simmons; Kelly Hawthorne; Paul Villanti; Philip W Kantoff; Elisabeth Heath; Daniel J George; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Elio Mazzone; Marco Bandini; Felix Preisser; Sebastiano Nazzani; Zhe Tian; Firas Abdollah; Denis Soulieres; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh Shariat; Fred Saad; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Rishi Deka; P Travis Courtney; J Kellogg Parsons; Tyler J Nelson; Vinit Nalawade; Elaine Luterstein; Daniel R Cherry; Daniel R Simpson; Arno J Mundt; James D Murphy; Anthony V D'Amico; Christopher J Kane; Maria Elena Martinez; Brent S Rose Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 56.272