Literature DB >> 26475368

Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices.

Rebecca Cohen1, Jeanelle Sheeder2, Natalia Arango2, Stephanie B Teal2, Kristina Tocce2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare discontinuation rates and incidence of repeat pregnancy within 1 year among young mothers choosing postplacental intrauterine devices (IUDs) versus postpartum contraceptive implants. STUDY
DESIGN: We enrolled a prospective cohort of postpartum adolescents and young women who chose either postplacental IUDs or postpartum contraceptive implants prior to hospital discharge. We used chart review and phone interviews to assess device discontinuation (by request or expulsion) and pregnancy within 12 months.
RESULTS: Of the 244 13-22 year-old participants, 82 chose IUDs (74 levonorgestrel IUDs and 8 copper IUDs), and 162 chose implants. Both groups had participant-requested discontinuation rates of 14% (9/67 IUD; 19/135 implant) within 1 year. Participants choosing IUDs had a 25% (17/67) expulsion rate. Median time to expulsion was 4.1 weeks (range: 0.4-29.3 weeks, 16/17 within 12 weeks), and participants recognized 15/17 expulsions. IUD initiators had significantly higher pregnancy rates by 12 months (7.6% vs. 1.5%, p=0.04). Most pregnancies occurred when women discontinued their initial device and did not start alternative contraception. DISCUSSION: Participant-requested discontinuation was similar in both groups. Differences in overall device discontinuation rates were due to IUD expulsions. Pregnancy rates by 12 months postpartum were lower than previously reported in this age group in both implant initiators and IUD initiators. IMPLICATIONS: Young mothers who choose postplacental IUDs or postpartum contraceptive implants are unlikely to request removal within the first year. Clinicians should counsel postplacental IUD users that early expulsion is common (25%) and may be unrecognized (11% of expulsions). Patients should have a plan for contraceptive management should expulsion occur.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Implant; Intrauterine device; Postpartum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26475368     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  16 in total

1.  One-year continuation of copper or levonorgestrel intrauterine devices initiated at the time of emergency contraception.

Authors:  J N Sanders; D K Turok; P A Royer; I S Thompson; L M Gawron; K E Storck
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Postpartum Contraceptive Use Among Denver-Based Adolescents and Young Adults: Association with Subsequent Repeat Delivery.

Authors:  Margo S Harrison; Rachel Zucker; Sharon Scarbro; Carter Sevick; Jeanelle Sheeder; Arthur J Davidson
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 1.814

3.  Determinants of Long-acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Initial and Continued Use among Adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  C Emily Hendrick; Joshua N Cone; Jessica Cirullo; Julie Maslowsky
Journal:  Adolesc Res Rev       Date:  2019-07-12

4.  Informing Policy Change: A Study of Rapid Repeat Pregnancy in Adolescents to Increase Access to Immediate Postpartum Contraception.

Authors:  Neena T Qasba; John W Stutsman; Greta E Weaver; Kathleen E Jones; Joanne K Daggy; Tracey A Wilkinson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Immediate Versus Delayed Insertion of the Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device in Postpartum Adolescents: A Randomized Pilot Study.

Authors:  Reni Soon; Katie McGuire; Jennifer Salcedo; Bliss Kaneshiro
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2018-03

6.  Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah H Averbach; Yokabed Ermias; Gary Jeng; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Naomi K Tepper; Tara C Jatlaoui
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  A Decision Analysis Model of 1-Year Effectiveness of Intended Postplacental Compared With Intended Delayed Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion.

Authors:  Sarita Sonalkar; Tegan Hunter; Elizabeth P Gurney; Arden McAllister; Courtney A Schreiber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  State-Identified Implementation Strategies to Increase Uptake of Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Policies.

Authors:  Charlan D Kroelinger; Isabel A Morgan; Carla L DeSisto; Cameron Estrich; Lisa F Waddell; Christine Mackie; Ellen Pliska; David A Goodman; Shanna Cox; Alisa Velonis; Kristin M Rankin
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Maura K Whiteman; Gary Jeng; Naomi K Tepper; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Effects of the copper intrauterine device versus injectable progestin contraception on pregnancy rates and method discontinuation among women attending termination of pregnancy services in South Africa: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Mandisa Singata-Madliki; Theresa A Lawrie; Eduardo Bergel; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.