Literature DB >> 26475223

Supporting the upper body with the hand on the thigh reduces back loading during lifting.

Idsart Kingma1, Gert S Faber2, Jaap H van Dieën2.   

Abstract

When picking objects from the floor, low back pain patients often tend to support the upper body by leaning with one hand on a thigh. While this strategy may reduce back load, this has not yet been assessed, probably due to the difficulty of measuring the forces between hand and thigh. Ten healthy male subjects lifted a pencil and a crate from the floor, with four lifting techniques (free, squat, stoop and a Weight Lifters Technique (WLT)), each of which was performed with and without supporting with one hand on the thigh. A six Degrees of Freedom force transducer, with a comfortable surface to support the hand on, was mounted just above the subject׳s left knee. Hand forces, ground reaction forces, full body kinematics, and trunk EMG were measured. Using inverse dynamics and taking the forces between hand and thigh into account, we calculated 3D L5S1 joint moments, and subsequently estimated spine forces using an EMG-assisted trunk model. For lifting a pencil, hand support reduced average peak total moments by 17-25%, dependent on lifting technique. For crate lifting, hand support reduced total moments by 13-19% compared with one-handed lifting and by 14-26% compared to two-handed lifting. Hand support slightly increased asymmetric motions and caused a substantial increase in asymmetric moments in crate lifting. For compression forces, reductions (up to 28%) were seen in all techniques except in stoop lifts. It is concluded that leaning with a hand on the thigh can lead to substantial reductions of low back loading during lifting.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Compression; Lifting; Low-back load; One handed lifting; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26475223     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  4 in total

1.  Lumbar spine loads are reduced for activities of daily living when using a braced arm-to-thigh technique.

Authors:  Erica Beaucage-Gauvreau; Scott C E Brandon; William S P Robertson; Robert Fraser; Brian J C Freeman; Ryan B Graham; Dominic Thewlis; Claire F Jones
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Equivalent Weight: Connecting Exoskeleton Effectiveness with Ergonomic Risk during Manual Material Handling.

Authors:  Christian Di Natali; Giorgia Chini; Stefano Toxiri; Luigi Monica; Sara Anastasi; Francesco Draicchio; Darwin G Caldwell; Jesús Ortiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Development and evaluation of a passive trunk support system for Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Nauzef Mahmood; Laura H C Peeters; Micha Paalman; Gijsbertus J Verkerke; Idsart Kingma; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.262

4.  Variation in lifting kinematics related to individual intrinsic lumbar curvature: an investigation in healthy adults.

Authors:  Anastasia V Pavlova; Judith R Meakin; Kay Cooper; Rebecca J Barr; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2018-07-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.