Literature DB >> 26474500

PEEK-Halo effect in interbody fusion.

Kevin Phan1, Jarred A Hogan2, Yusuf Assem2, Ralph J Mobbs3.   

Abstract

Recent developments have seen poly[aryl-ether-ether-ketone] (PEEK) being increasingly used in vertebral body fusion. More novel approaches to improve PEEK have included the introduction of titanium-PEEK (Ti-PEEK) composites and coatings. This paper aims to describe a potential complication of PEEK based implants relating to poorer integration with the surrounding bone, producing a "PEEK-Halo" effect which is not seen in Ti-PEEK composite implants. We present images from two patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). The first patient underwent an L5/S1 ALIF using a PEEK implant whilst the second patient underwent L4/L5 ALIF using a Ti-PEEK composite implant. Evidence of osseointegration was sought using CT imaging and confirmed using histological preparations of a sheep tibia model. The PEEK-Halo effect is demonstrated by a halo effect between the PEEK implant and the bone graft on CT imaging. This phenomenon is secondary to poor osseointegration of PEEK implants. The PEEK-Halo effect was not demonstrated in the second patient who received a Ti-PEEK composite graft. Histological analysis of graft/bone interface surfaces in PEEK versus Ti-PEEK implants in a sheep model further confirmed poorer osseointegration of the PEEK implant. In conclusion, the PEEK-Halo effect is seen secondary to minimal osseointegration of PEEK at the adjacent vertebral endplate following a PEEK implant insertion. This effect is not seen with Ti-PEEK implants, and may support the role of titanium in improving the bone-implant interface of PEEK substrates.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Bone–implant interface; Osseointegration; PEEK; Titanium; Titanium coating

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26474500     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  11 in total

Review 1.  3-dimensional printing for anterior cervical surgery: a review.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

2.  Impact of mechanical stability on the progress of bone ongrowth on the frame surfaces of a titanium-coated PEEK cage and a 3D porous titanium alloy cage: in vivo analysis using CT color mapping.

Authors:  Takahiro Makino; Shota Takaneka; Yusuke Sakai; Hideki Yoshikawa; Takashi Kaito
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A single center retrospective clinical evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion comparing allograft spacers to silicon nitride cages.

Authors:  Micah W Smith; Daniel R Romano; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

4.  Standalone titanium/polyetheretherketone interbody cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Clinical and radiological results at 24 months.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Tajrian Amin; Kevin Phan; Darweesh Al Khawaja; Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Vedran Lovric; William R Walsh
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-03-09

5.  Empty polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) show slow radiographic fusion that reduces clinical improvement: results from the prospective multicenter "PIERCE-PEEK" study.

Authors:  Olaf Suess; Martin Schomaker; Mario Cabraja; Marco Danne; Theodoros Kombos; Michael Hanna
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2017-04-28

6.  Does partial coating with titanium improve the radiographic fusion rate of empty PEEK cages in cervical spine surgery? A comparative analysis of clinical data.

Authors:  Andreas Kotsias; Sven Mularski; Björn Kühn; Michael Hanna; Olaf Suess
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2017-04-28

7.  Technical Note: Pedicle Cement Augmentation with Proximal Screw Toggle and Loosening.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William R Walsh; Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  Comparative Study of Cage Subsidence in Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Akihiko Hiyama; Daisuke Sakai; Hiroyuki Katoh; Satoshi Nomura; Masato Sato; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Two-year results of a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) versus silicon nitride spinal fusion cages in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders.

Authors:  Bryan J McEntire; Greg Maslin; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-09

10.  Does PEEK/HA Enhance Bone Formation Compared With PEEK in a Sheep Cervical Fusion Model?

Authors:  William R Walsh; Matthew H Pelletier; Nicky Bertollo; Chris Christou; Chris Tan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.