Literature DB >> 26473754

Economic and environmental sustainability of submerged anaerobic MBR-based (AnMBR-based) technology as compared to aerobic-based technologies for moderate-/high-loaded urban wastewater treatment.

R Pretel1, A Robles2, M V Ruano3, A Seco4, J Ferrer5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the economic and environmental sustainability of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) in comparison with aerobic-based technologies for moderate-/high-loaded urban wastewater (UWW) treatment. To this aim, a combined approach of steady-state performance modelling, life cycle analysis (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) was used, in which AnMBR (coupled with an aerobic-based post-treatment) was compared to aerobic membrane bioreactor (AeMBR) and conventional activated sludge (CAS). AnMBR with CAS-based post-treatment for nutrient removal was identified as a sustainable option for moderate-/high-loaded UWW treatment: low energy consumption and reduced sludge production could be obtained at given operating conditions. In addition, significant reductions can be achieved in different aspects of environmental impact (global warming potential (GWP), abiotic depletion, acidification, etc.) and LCC over existing UWW treatment technologies.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Global warming potential (GWP); Life cycle analysis (LCA); Life cycle costing (LCC); Steady-state performance modelling; Submerged anaerobic MBR (AnMBR)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26473754     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  5 in total

1.  Technical, hygiene, economic, and life cycle assessment of full-scale moving bed biofilm reactors for wastewater treatment in India.

Authors:  Anju Singh; Sheetal Jaisingh Kamble; Megha Sawant; Yogita Chakravarthy; Absar Kazmi; Enrique Aymerich; Markus Starkl; Makarand Ghangrekar; Ligy Philip
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Energy and greenhouse gas life cycle assessment and cost analysis of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactor systems: Influence of scale, population density, climate, and methane recovery.

Authors:  Sarah Cashman; Xin Ma; Janet Mosley; Jay Garland; Brian Crone; Xiaobo Xue
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Simultaneous removal of concentrated organics, nitrogen and phosphorus nutrients by an oxygen-limited membrane bioreactor.

Authors:  Shengyun Yang; Gang Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Characterization and Dynamic Shift of Microbial Communities during Start-Up, Overloading and Steady-State in an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor.

Authors:  Nsanzumukiza Martin Vincent; Yuansong Wei; Junya Zhang; Dawei Yu; Juan Tong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Assessment of an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor (AnMBR) Treating Medium-Strength Synthetic Wastewater under Cyclical Membrane Operation.

Authors:  Ahmet E Uman; Robert A Bair; Daniel H Yeh
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.