Literature DB >> 29127641

Technical, hygiene, economic, and life cycle assessment of full-scale moving bed biofilm reactors for wastewater treatment in India.

Anju Singh1, Sheetal Jaisingh Kamble2, Megha Sawant3, Yogita Chakravarthy3, Absar Kazmi4, Enrique Aymerich5, Markus Starkl6, Makarand Ghangrekar7, Ligy Philip8.   

Abstract

Moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) is a highly effective biological treatment process applied to treat both urban and industrial wastewaters in developing countries. The present study investigated the technical performance of ten full-scale MBBR systems located across India. The biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total suspended solid, pathogens, and nutrient removal efficiencies were low as compared to the values claimed in literature. Plant 1 was considered for evaluation of environmental impacts using life cycle assessment approach. CML 2 baseline 2000 methodology was adopted, in which 11 impact categories were considered. The life cycle impact assessment results revealed that the main environmental hot spot of this system was energy consumption. Additionally, two scenarios were compared: scenario 1 (direct discharge of treated effluent, i.e., no reuse) and scenario 2 (effluent reuse and tap water replacement). The results showed that scenario 2 significantly reduce the environmental impact in all the categories ultimately decreasing the environmental burden. Moreover, significant economic and environmental benefits can be obtained in scenario 2 by replacing the freshwater demand for non-potable uses. To enhance the performance of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), there is a need to optimize energy consumption and increase wastewater collection efficiency to maximize the operating capacity of plant and minimize overall environmental footprint. It was concluded that MBBR can be a good alternative for upgrading and optimizing existing municipal wastewater treatment plants with appropriate tertiary treatment. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Economic costs; Environmental impacts; Life cycle assessment; Moving bed biofilm reactor; Pathogen removal; Wastewater treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29127641     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0605-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  35 in total

1.  A pilot plant study using a vertically moving biofilm process to treat municipal wastewater.

Authors:  M Rodgers; X-M Zhan; B Gallagher
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.642

2.  Life cycle assessment as development and decision support tool for wastewater resource recovery technology.

Authors:  Linda L Fang; Borja Valverde-Pérez; Anders Damgaard; Benedek Gy Plósz; Martin Rygaard
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Environmental performance of biological nutrient removal processes from a life cycle perspective.

Authors:  Guillermo A Ontiveros; Enrique A Campanella
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 9.642

4.  LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant.

Authors:  Jorgelina C Pasqualino; Montse Meneses; Montserrat Abella; Francesc Castells
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Comparative analysis of the bacterial diversity in a lab-scale moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) applied to treat urban wastewater under different operational conditions.

Authors:  Kadiya Calderón; Jaime Martín-Pascual; José Manuel Poyatos; Belén Rodelas; Alejandro González-Martínez; Jesús González-López
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  Importance of the operating pH in maintaining the stability of anoxic ammonium oxidation (anammox) activity in moving bed biofilm reactors.

Authors:  L W Jaroszynski; N Cicek; R Sparling; J A Oleszkiewicz
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 9.642

7.  Prediction of moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) performance for the treatment of aniline using artificial neural networks (ANN).

Authors:  M Delnavaz; B Ayati; H Ganjidoust
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  The environmental footprint of a membrane bioreactor treatment process through Life Cycle Analysis.

Authors:  L Ioannou-Ttofa; S Foteinis; E Chatzisymeon; D Fatta-Kassinos
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Responses of biofilm characteristics to variations in temperature and NH4(+)-N loading in a moving-bed biofilm reactor treating micro-polluted raw water.

Authors:  Shuangfu Zhang; Yayi Wang; Weitao He; Min Wu; Meiyan Xing; Jian Yang; Naiyun Gao; Daqiang Yin
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 9.642

10.  Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor (MB-MBR) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems: influence of wastewater salinity variation.

Authors:  Daniele Di Trapani; Gaetano Di Bella; Giorgio Mannina; Michele Torregrossa; Gaspare Viviani
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 9.642

View more
  1 in total

1.  Life cycle impact assessment and life cycle cost assessment for centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment plants in Thailand.

Authors:  Rutjaya Prateep Na Talang; Sanya Sirivithayapakorn; Sucheela Polruang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.