| Literature DB >> 26473728 |
Courtney Boysen1, Elizabeth G Davis1, Laurie A Beard1, Brian V Lubbers2, Ram K Raghavan2.
Abstract
Kansas witnessed an unprecedented outbreak in Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infection among horses, a disease commonly referred to as pigeon fever during fall 2012. Bayesian geostatistical models were developed to identify key environmental and climatic risk factors associated with C. pseudotuberculosis infection in horses. Positive infection status among horses (cases) was determined by positive test results for characteristic abscess formation, positive bacterial culture on purulent material obtained from a lanced abscess (n = 82), or positive serologic evidence of exposure to organism (≥ 1:512)(n = 11). Horses negative for these tests (n = 172)(controls) were considered free of infection. Information pertaining to horse demographics and stabled location were obtained through review of medical records and/or contact with horse owners via telephone. Covariate information for environmental and climatic determinants were obtained from USDA (soil attributes), USGS (land use/land cover), and NASA MODIS and NASA Prediction of Worldwide Renewable Resources (climate). Candidate covariates were screened using univariate regression models followed by Bayesian geostatistical models with and without covariates. The best performing model indicated a protective effect for higher soil moisture content (OR = 0.53, 95% CrI = 0.25, 0.71), and detrimental effects for higher land surface temperature (≥ 35°C) (OR = 2.81, 95% CrI = 2.21, 3.85) and habitat fragmentation (OR = 1.31, 95% CrI = 1.27, 2.22) for C. pseudotuberculosis infection status in horses, while age, gender and breed had no effect. Preventative and ecoclimatic significance of these findings are discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26473728 PMCID: PMC4608828 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140666
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Case control distribution in the study region.
Dark circles indicate case locations and open circles are control locations.
Case-control characteristics enrolled in the study.
| Case n (%) | Control n (%) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| <1 | 2 (2.44) | 17 (9.88) |
| 1 to 6 | 14 (17.07) | 34 (19.77) |
| 7 to 11 | 22 (26.83) | 44 (25.58) |
| 12 to 17 | 24 (29.27) | 28 (16.28) |
| 18 to 23 | 11 (13.41) | 18 (10.47) |
| 24 to 29 | 5 (6.10) | 4 (2.33) |
| 29 and more | 1 (1.22) | 5 (2.91) |
| Unknown | 3 (3.66) | 22 (12.79) |
|
| ||
| Male | 9 (10.97) | 26 (15.11) |
| Female | 39 (47.56) | 65 (37.79) |
| Male neutered | 28 (34.14) | 64 (37.20) |
| Unknown | 6 (7.31) | 17 (9.88) |
Potential explanatory variables considered in the study.
| Source/Variable | Control (Mean ± S.D) | Case (Mean ± S.D) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Soil moisture | 41.2 ± 10.5 | 20.8 ± 5.0 | 0.001 |
|
| 7.4 ± 0.5 | 7.3 ± 0.4 | 0.354 |
| Organic matter content | 7.3 ± 1.4 | 14.1 ± 5.2 | 0.258 |
| Excessively drained | 14 ± 3.2 | 13.1 ± 6.7 | 0.745 |
| Somewhat excessively drained | 8.1 ± 3.4 | 14.1 ± 7.2 | 0.621 |
| Moderately well drained | 17.0 ± 6.2 | 15.0 ± 8.1 | 0.662 |
| Well drained | 18.2 ± 4.6 | 17.0 ± 6.2 | 0.225 |
| Poorly drained | 5.6 ± 2.1 | 4.9 ± 2.1 | 0.548 |
| Somewhat poorly drained | 4.2 ± 1.2 | 3.8 ± 1.5 | 0.741 |
| Frequent flooding | 1.9 ± 0.9 | 2.3 ± 1.2 | 0.811 |
| Rare flooding | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 2.4 ± 1.0 | 0.514 |
| Very rare flooding | 4.2 ± 1.4 | 3.5 ± 1.5 | 0.332 |
| No flooding | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 2.3 ± 1.1 | 0.211 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Barren land | 11.9 ± 8.3 | 8.2 ± 3.9 | 0.514 |
| Deciduous forest | 14.6 ± 5.6 | 17.2 ± 6.8 | 0.841 |
| Mixed forest | 2.6 ± 1.0 | 1.6 ± 0.9 | 0.153 |
| Evergreen forest | 11.2 ± 6.3 | 17.3 ± 8.7 | 0.354 |
| Scrub/shrub | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 4.2 ± 1.8 | 0.458 |
| Grassland/herbaceous | 28.4 ± 3.1 | 25.36 ± 2.8 | 0.122 |
| Pasture/hay | 14.6 ± 5.3 | 7.2 ± 3.4 | 0.224 |
| Woody wetlands | 8.6 ± 3.8 | 2.5 ± 0.9 | 0.541 |
| Emergent herbaceous wetlands | 4.6 ± 2.1 | 6.3 ± 3.1 | 0.365 |
|
| |||
| Total Edge Contrast (TECI) (habitat fragmentation) | 37.5 ± 12.6 | 49.6 ± 8.0 | 0.008 |
| Largest Patch Index (LPI) | 12.8 ± 5.3 | 13.5 ± 4.9 | 0.367 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| ≥35° | 37.2 ± 1.7 | 39.4 ± 0.8 | 0.011 |
| 28−34.9° | 29.3 ± 0.8 | 29.1 ± 1.2 | 0.211 |
| 24.9−27.9° | 26.1 ± 1.1 | 25.9 ± 0.4 | 0.284 |
| ≤25° | Reference category | ||
|
| |||
| ≤16° | Reference category | ||
| 15.9−19.9° | 16.5 ± 1.1 | 16.7 ± 1.3 | 0.618 |
| ≥20° | 21.8 ± 0.9 | 22.1 ± 0.8 | 0.514 |
|
| |||
| 14.3 ± 0.3 | 14.1 ± 0.2 | 0.287 | |
|
| |||
| Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) | 0.28 ± 0.1 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | 0.451 |
| Daily maximum temperature | 30.3 ± 1.4 | 31.4 ± 0.8 | 0.365 |
| Daily minimum temperature | 16.8 ± 1.4 | 17.8 ± 0.5 | 0.224 |
| Daily average temperature | 28.1 ± 2.1 | 29.0 ± 0.9 | 0.578 |
| Dew point | 61 ± 6.2 | 54 ± 8.1 | 0.741 |
| Relative humidity | 76 ± 10.2 | 80 ± 11.1 | 0.248 |
| Diurnal temperature range | 13.5 ± 0.4 | 13.7 ± 0.2 | 0.621 |
A total of 35 variables were considered for univariate evaluations. There were 14 variables derived from the USDA SSURGO database, 11 from NLCD, and 10 variables from NASA’s MODIS and POWER sources. All variables except daytime land surface temperature and night-time land surface temperature were in continuous form. ≤ 25°C and ≤ 16°C were used as reference categories in the models for daytime land surface temperature and night-time land surface temperature, respectively. A total of 5 variables retained significance in the univariate screening, with a liberal p−value ≤ 0.2. They were, soil moisture (p = 0.001), mixed forests (p = 0.153), grassland/herbaceous cover(p = 0.122), total edge contrast index (p = 0.008), and day time land surface temperature (≥ 35°C) (p = 0.011).
Fig 2Number of positive pigeon fever cases diagnosed between 2005–2013 (a), and during 2012/13 (b) at the Veterinary Health Center and Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Kansas State University.
Fig 3Distribution of percentage soil moisture and habitat fragmentation, surrounding case control locations in the study region.
Soil moisture readings pertain to the soil moisture profile for a referenced map unit in a 2.5 km buffer area surrounding case control locations, recorded every month and averaged annually and describe the representative soil moisture situation for the map unit throughout the year [16]. Total edge contrast index, a measure of landscape fragmentation was measured by estimating the sum of lengths of each edge segment in the landscape multiplied by the corresponding contrast weight, divided by the total length of edge in the landscape and multiplied by 100 for percentages, for a 2.5 km buffer area surrounding case control locations [38].
Fig 4Distribution of weekly average land surface temperatures (daytime) recorded 8–12 weeks prior to diagnosis within a 2.5 km buffer area surrounding case-control locations.
Odds ratios and 95% Bayes CrI from Bayesian geostatistical analysis.
| Model/variable | Coefficient, posterior median (95% Bayes credible interval) | Odds ratio, posterior median (95% Bayes credible interval) |
|---|---|---|
| a) | ||
|
| 1.51 (-0.42–3.16) | - |
|
| 0.72 (0.32–1.15) | - |
|
| 0.38 (0.11–0.82) | - |
| DIC | 740 | - |
| b) | ||
|
| 2.01 (1.71–2.80) | - |
| Soil moisture | 0.53 (0.25, 0.71) | |
|
| ||
| ≥ 35° | 2.81 (2.21, 3.85) | |
| 28−34.9° | 1.15 (0.98, 2.24) | |
| 24.9−27.9° | 1.07 (0.59, 1.17) | |
| ≤ 25° | Reference category | |
| Total edge contrast index | 1.31 (1.27, 2.22) | |
|
| 0.81 (0.32–1.10) | - |
|
| 0.30 (0.11–0.67) | - |
| DIC | 681 | - |
The smoothing parameter, κ in Bayesian spatial models controls the amount of spatial continuity with distance in the S term. The decay parameter, ϕ refers to the decay of spatial correlation in terms of distance measured in decimal degrees (1 decimal degree at the equator is approximately 120 kilometers). A Bayesian geostatistical model with all covariates selected in the univariate procedure had a DIC value of 684, and the removal of mixed forest and grassland herbaceous cover one at a time resulted in model DIC values of 679 and 681, respectively and were discarded. The removal of Daytime LST, TECI and soil moisture one at a time in that order resulted in DIC values of 694, 691 and 703, respectively and were retained in the final model. Age and sex covariates were inserted in the Bayesian geostatistical model with covariates, one at a time, and ≥10% changes to posterior median estimates was not noted following insertions. The ‘unknown’ groups for age and sex were used as reference categories.