D E Lukins1, S Pilati2, E J Escott3. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (D.E.L. E.J.E.) douglas.lukins@uky.edu. 2. Department of Radiology (S.P.), John H. Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois. 3. From the Departments of Radiology (D.E.L. E.J.E.) Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (E.J.E.), University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Retropharyngeal carotid arteries are a clinically relevant anatomic variant. Prior studies have documented their incidence, but only a single case report has discussed the change in position of the carotid artery to and from a retropharyngeal location. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of retropharyngeal carotid arteries and to evaluate the change in position of retropharyngeal carotid arteries over serial CT examinations of the neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 306 CT examinations of the neck in 144 patients was performed. Patients with previous neck surgery or neck masses displacing the carotid arteries were excluded. The position of each carotid artery was evaluated on each examination. In patients with prior examinations, change or lack of change in position was recorded. The data were reviewed to assess changes in the position of the carotid arteries. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients evaluated, 34 were excluded. The final number of examinations included in the study was 249. Sixty-three of 110 patients had at least 1 comparison study. Twenty-three retropharyngeal carotid arteries were present on the baseline examination in 17 (15.5%) of 110 patients. There was documented change to or from a retropharyngeal position in 4 (6.3%) of 63 patients with comparison studies. CONCLUSIONS: The phenomenon of migration of the carotid arteries to and from a retropharyngeal position with time is confirmed by our study. It is important for physicians to be aware of this phenomenon to avoid potential procedural complications.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Retropharyngeal carotid arteries are a clinically relevant anatomic variant. Prior studies have documented their incidence, but only a single case report has discussed the change in position of the carotid artery to and from a retropharyngeal location. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of retropharyngeal carotid arteries and to evaluate the change in position of retropharyngeal carotid arteries over serial CT examinations of the neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 306 CT examinations of the neck in 144 patients was performed. Patients with previous neck surgery or neck masses displacing the carotid arteries were excluded. The position of each carotid artery was evaluated on each examination. In patients with prior examinations, change or lack of change in position was recorded. The data were reviewed to assess changes in the position of the carotid arteries. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients evaluated, 34 were excluded. The final number of examinations included in the study was 249. Sixty-three of 110 patients had at least 1 comparison study. Twenty-three retropharyngeal carotid arteries were present on the baseline examination in 17 (15.5%) of 110 patients. There was documented change to or from a retropharyngeal position in 4 (6.3%) of 63 patients with comparison studies. CONCLUSIONS: The phenomenon of migration of the carotid arteries to and from a retropharyngeal position with time is confirmed by our study. It is important for physicians to be aware of this phenomenon to avoid potential procedural complications.
Authors: L Del Corso; D Moruzzo; B Conte; M Agelli; A M Romanelli; F Pastine; M Protti; F Pentimone; G Baggiani Journal: Angiology Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi; Timothy W Deller; Audrey Peiwen Fan; Praveen K Gulaka; Bin Shen; Prachi Singh; Jun-Hyung Park; Frederick T Chin; Greg Zaharchuk Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Winona W Wu; Patric Liang; Thomas F X O'Donnell; Nicholas J Swerdlow; Chun Li; Mark C Wyers; Marc L Schermerhorn Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Siti Asmat Md Arepen; Azreen Zaira Abu Bakar; Nour Hanan Daniah Mohd Bakhit; Ahmad Anwaar Bin Muhammad Saifullah; Nor Azirah Salahuddin; Nor Eyzawiah Hassan Journal: Iran J Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2022-05