L A Palifka1, L D Frasier2, R R Metzger3, G L Hedlund4. 1. From the Department of Radiology (L.A.P.), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire lpalifka@hitchock.org. 2. Division of Child Abuse Pediatrics (L.D.F.), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania. 3. Division of Pediatric Surgery (R.R.M.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 4. Department of Medical Imaging (G.L.H.), Primary Children's Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accurate differentiation of abusive head trauma and accidental head injury in infants and young children is critical and impacts clinical care, patient prognosis, forensic investigations, and medicolegal proceedings. No specific finding seen on cross-sectional brain imaging has been reported to distinguish abusive head trauma from accidental injury. Our study investigated whether a specific imaging finding, parenchymal brain laceration, is unique to children diagnosed with abusive head trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 137 patients with abusive head trauma and 28 patients who incurred moderate to severe accidental brain injury. Brain MR imaging represented the imaging standard for characterizing intracranial injuries. RESULTS: Among the abusive head trauma cohort, parenchymal brain lacerations were identified in 18 patients, while none were identified in any patients with accidental injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are in concurrence with the existing forensic, pathology, and imaging literature, which suggests that parenchymal brain lacerations may be related to abusive injury mechanisms.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accurate differentiation of abusive head trauma and accidental head injury in infants and young children is critical and impacts clinical care, patient prognosis, forensic investigations, and medicolegal proceedings. No specific finding seen on cross-sectional brain imaging has been reported to distinguish abusive head trauma from accidental injury. Our study investigated whether a specific imaging finding, parenchymal brain laceration, is unique to children diagnosed with abusive head trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 137 patients with abusive head trauma and 28 patients who incurred moderate to severe accidental brain injury. Brain MR imaging represented the imaging standard for characterizing intracranial injuries. RESULTS: Among the abusive head trauma cohort, parenchymal brain lacerations were identified in 18 patients, while none were identified in any patients with accidental injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are in concurrence with the existing forensic, pathology, and imaging literature, which suggests that parenchymal brain lacerations may be related to abusive injury mechanisms.
Authors: Kirsten Bechtel; Kathleen Stoessel; John M Leventhal; Eileen Ogle; Barbara Teague; Sylvia Lavietes; Bruna Banyas; Karin Allen; James Dziura; Charles Duncan Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Arabinda Kumar Choudhary; Sabah Servaes; Thomas L Slovis; Vincent J Palusci; Gary L Hedlund; Sandeep K Narang; Joëlle Anne Moreno; Mark S Dias; Cindy W Christian; Marvin D Nelson; V Michelle Silvera; Susan Palasis; Maria Raissaki; Andrea Rossi; Amaka C Offiah Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2018-05-23
Authors: G Orman; S F Kralik; N K Desai; T G Singer; S Kwabena; S Risen; T A G M Huisman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jill R McTavish; Andrea Gonzalez; Nancy Santesso; Jennifer C D MacGregor; Chris McKee; Harriet L MacMillan Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2020-03-07 Impact factor: 2.125