Literature DB >> 15231923

Characteristics that distinguish accidental from abusive injury in hospitalized young children with head trauma.

Kirsten Bechtel1, Kathleen Stoessel, John M Leventhal, Eileen Ogle, Barbara Teague, Sylvia Lavietes, Bruna Banyas, Karin Allen, James Dziura, Charles Duncan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical features that distinguish accidental from abusive head injury in hospitalized children <24 months of age.
METHODS: Prospective study of children <24 months of age hospitalized for head injury between August 1, 2000, and October 31, 2002. During hospitalization, children had computed tomographic scans of the brain, serial neurologic examinations, dilated ophthalmoscopic eye examinations, evaluation by a social worker, and, in some cases, a child abuse specialist. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was the proportion of children in each group with retinal hemorrhages (RHs). Secondary outcome measures were the proportion of children in each group who had vitreous hemorrhage; abnormal mental status on presentation; seizures; scalp hematomas; need for anticonvulsants; and operative procedures such as subdural tap, craniotomy, ventriculostomy, tracheostomy, and gastrostomy.
RESULTS: Eighty-seven children were prospectively enrolled. Fifteen children were classified as having abusive head injury, and 72 were classified as having accidental head injury. Five children, all in the accidental head injury group, were excluded from statistical analysis, because they did not have a dilated ophthalmoscopic examination during their hospitalization. Thus 82 children were included in the statistical analysis. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to mean age, gender, or ethnicity. RHs were more likely to be seen in children with abusive head injury (60% vs 10%) and were more likely to be bilateral (40% vs 1.5%). Pre-RHs were more likely to be seen in children with abusive head injury (30% vs 0%). Premacular RHs and RHs that extended to the periphery of the retina were also more likely to be seen in children with abusive head injury (20% vs 0% and 27% vs 0%, respectively). Of the 7 children with accidental head injury who had RHs, 6 had unilateral RHs. Children with abusive head injury were more likely to have seizures (53% vs 6%) and an abnormal mental status on initial presentation (53% vs 1%). Children with accidental head injury were more likely to have scalp hematomas (6.7% vs 49%).
CONCLUSIONS: RHs are seen more often in abusive head injury and often are bilateral and involve the preretinal layer. Children with abusive head injury were more likely to have RHs that cover the macula and extend to the periphery of the retina. Unilateral RHs can be seen in children with accidental head injury. Children with abusive head injury were more likely to present with abnormal mental status and seizures, whereas children with accidental head injury were more likely to have scalp hematomas. Such characteristics may be useful to distinguish accidental from abusive head trauma in children <24 months of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15231923     DOI: 10.1542/peds.114.1.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  40 in total

1.  Abnormal neuroimaging is associated with early in-hospital seizures in pediatric abusive head trauma.

Authors:  Joshua L Goldstein; Daniel Leonhardt; Natalie Kmytyuk; Francine Kim; Deli Wang; Mark S Wainwright
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children.

Authors:  Arabinda Kumar Choudhary; Sabah Servaes; Thomas L Slovis; Vincent J Palusci; Gary L Hedlund; Sandeep K Narang; Joëlle Anne Moreno; Mark S Dias; Cindy W Christian; Marvin D Nelson; V Michelle Silvera; Susan Palasis; Maria Raissaki; Andrea Rossi; Amaka C Offiah
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-05-23

3.  Diagnosing abusive head trauma: the challenges faced by clinicians.

Authors:  John M Leventhal; Andrea G Asnes; Lisa Pavlovic; Rebecca L Moles
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-12-14

4.  Alternate theories of causation in abusive head trauma: what the science tells us.

Authors:  Carole Jenny
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-12-14

5.  Predictors of long-term neurological outcomes in non-accidental head injury.

Authors:  C F Chong; S L Misra; J A Escardo-Paton; S Dai
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Abusive Head Trauma and Mortality-An Analysis From an International Comparative Effectiveness Study of Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Nikki Miller Ferguson; Ajit Sarnaik; Darryl Miles; Nadeem Shafi; Mark J Peters; Edward Truemper; Monica S Vavilala; Michael J Bell; Stephen R Wisniewski; James F Luther; Adam L Hartman; Patrick M Kochanek
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  Pediatric head trauma: the evidence regarding indications for emergent neuroimaging.

Authors:  Nathan Kuppermann
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23

8.  Cyclic Head Rotations Produce Modest Brain Injury in Infant Piglets.

Authors:  Brittany Coats; Gil Binenbaum; Colin Smith; Robert L Peiffer; Cindy W Christian; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Susan S Margulies
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 9.  Retinal haemorrhages and related findings in abusive and non-abusive head trauma: a systematic review.

Authors:  S A Maguire; P O Watts; A D Shaw; S Holden; R H Taylor; W J Watkins; M K Mann; V Tempest; A M Kemp
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  The yield of high-detail radiographic skeletal surveys in suspected infant abuse.

Authors:  Ignasi Barber; Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Celeste R Wilson; Paul K Kleinman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.