Literature DB >> 26471199

Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.

Steffen Kortlang1, Manfred Mauermann2, Stephan D Ewert2.   

Abstract

People with sensorineural hearing loss generally suffer from a reduced ability to understand speech in complex acoustic listening situations, particularly when background noise is present. In addition to the loss of audibility, a mixture of suprathreshold processing deficits is possibly involved, like altered basilar membrane compression and related changes, as well as a reduced ability of temporal coding. A series of 6 monaural psychoacoustic experiments at 0.5, 2, and 6 kHz was conducted with 18 subjects, divided equally into groups of young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners, aiming at disentangling the effects of age and hearing loss on psychoacoustic performance in noise. Random frequency modulation detection thresholds (RFMDTs) with a low-rate modulator in wide-band noise, and discrimination of a phase-jittered Schroeder-phase from a random-phase harmonic tone complex are suggested to characterize the individual ability of temporal processing. The outcome was compared to thresholds of pure tones and narrow-band noise, loudness growth functions, auditory filter bandwidths, and tone-in-noise detection thresholds. At 500 Hz, results suggest a contribution of temporal fine structure (TFS) to pure-tone detection thresholds. Significant correlation with auditory thresholds and filter bandwidths indicated an impact of frequency selectivity on TFS usability in wide-band noise. When controlling for the effect of threshold sensitivity, the listener's age significantly correlated with tone-in-noise detection and RFMDTs in noise at 500 Hz, showing that older listeners were particularly affected by background noise at low carrier frequencies.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Hearing loss; Noise; Suprathreshold processing; Temporal fine structure

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26471199     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  11 in total

1.  Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Allison B Kern; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The Interplay Between Spike-Time and Spike-Rate Modes in the Auditory Nerve Encodes Tone-In-Noise Threshold.

Authors:  Antoine Huet; Gilles Desmadryl; Thomas Justal; Régis Nouvian; Jean-Luc Puel; Jérôme Bourien
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Aphasia and Auditory Processing after Stroke through an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Lens.

Authors:  Suzanne C Purdy; Iruni Wanigasekara; Oscar M Cañete; Celia Moore; Clare M McCann
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-08

4.  Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-noise Testing as a Hearing Screening and Triage Tool to Classify Type of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Karina C De Sousa; Cas Smits; David R Moore; Hermanus C Myburgh; De Wet Swanepoel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  Speech Recognition in Noise for Adults With Normal Hearing: Age-Normative Performance for AzBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Laura M Levin; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Selective attention modulates neural envelope tracking of informationally masked speech in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Ira Kurthen; Jolanda Galbier; Laura Jagoda; Pia Neuschwander; Nathalie Giroud; Martin Meyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment.

Authors:  Martine Coene; Stefanie Krijger; Matthias Meeuws; Geert De Ceulaer; Paul J Govaerts
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise With Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Henrik Danielsson; Mathias Hällgren; Stefan Stenfelt; Jerker Rönnberg; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Current Profile of Adults Presenting for Preoperative Cochlear Implant Evaluation.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Susan M Reynolds; Linsey W Sunderhaus; René H Gifford
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  A risk model and nomogram for high-frequency hearing loss in noise-exposed workers.

Authors:  Ruican Sun; Weiwei Shang; Yingqiong Cao; Yajia Lan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.