| Literature DB >> 26469863 |
Evida A Dennis1, Mamie T Coats2, Sarah E Griffin1, Joanetha Y Hale1, Lea Novak3, David E Briles4, Marilyn J Crain4.
Abstract
Recent studies have reported the isolation of highly mucoid serotype 3 <span class="Species">Streptococcus pneumoniae (Sp) from the repan class="Species">Species">spi<Species">span class="Species">ratory tracts of children with cystic fibrosis (CF). Whether these highly mucoid Sp contribute to, or are associated with, respiratory failure among patients with CF remains unknown. Other mucoid bacteria, predominately Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are associated with CF respiratory decline. We used a mouse model of CF to study pneumococcal pneumonia with highly mucoid serotype 3 and non-mucoid serotype 19A Sp isolates. We investigated susceptibility to infection, survival, and bacterial counts from bronchoaviolar lavage samples and lung homogenates, as well as associated inflammatory cytokines at the site of infection, and lung pathology. Congenic CFTR-/- mice and wild-type (WT)-mice were infected intranasally with CHB756, CHB1126, and WU2 (highly mucoid capsular serotype 3, intermediately mucoid serotype 3, and less mucoid serotype 3, respectively), or CHB1058 (non-mucoid serotype 19A). BAL, lung homogenates, and blood were collected from mice 5 days post-infection. Higher CFU recovery and shorter survival were observed following infection of CFTR-/- mice with CHB756 compared to infection with CHB1126, WU2, or CHB1058 (P≤0.001). Additionally, CFTR-/- mice infected with CHB756 and CHB1126 were more susceptible to infection than WT-mice (P≤0.05). Between CFTR-/- mice and WT-mice, no significant differences in TNF-α, CXCL1/KC concentrations, or lung histopathology were observed. Our results indicate that highly mucoid type 3 Sp causes more severe lung disease than non-mucoid Sp, and does so more readily in the lungs of CFTR-/- than WT-mice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26469863 PMCID: PMC4607445 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The effect of CFTR on bacterial clearance.
CFTR–/– mice (solid boxes) and WT- mice (open boxes) were infected with 7x105 CFU of Sp strain CHB756, CHB1058, or WU2 (n = 8–10) or 1x105 CFU of Sp strain CHB1126 (n = 6). CFUs were quantified from lung homogenates (A) and BAL fluid (B) 5 days post-infection. Each data point represents one mouse. The horizontal lines indicate the median for each group. CFTR–/– mice and WT-mice were directly compared for each strain using the Mann- Whitney (two-tailed) Test on ranked data (as described in the methods). P-values are for comparisons between WT and CFTR–/– mice in each treatment group, Experiments were repeated at least twice. P-values ≥ 0.05 are not shown. Statistical comparisons between results with different challenge strains are listed in Table 2.
Fig 2Cytokine production after intranasal infection with mucoid Sp isolate CHB756.
CFTR–/– mice and WT-mice were infected with 1x105 CFU of bacteria (n = 6–7). CFUs were quantified from lung homogenates (A) and BAL fluid (B) 24 hours post-infection. TNF-α production was measured by ELISA in lung homogenates (C) in BAL (D). CXCL1/KC production was measured by ELISA in lung homogenates (E) and in BAL (F). Each dot represents the data for one mouse. The horizontal lines indicate the median for each group. Experiments were repeated at least twice. P-values≥ 0.05 are not shown.
Comparison of CFU recovered from BAL and Lung Homogenates from CFTR–/– and WT-mice infected with serotype 3 and 19A isolates of SP from CF patients.
| Mice | Sample | Comparison |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFTR–/– | Lung Homogenate | CHB756 | versus | WU2 |
|
| CHB756 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| WU2 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| CFTR–/– | BAL | CHB756 | versus | WU2 |
|
| CHB756 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| WU2 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| WT | Lung Homogenate | CHB756 | versus | WU2 | ns |
| CHB756 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| WU2 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| WT | BAL | CHB756 | versus | WU2 | ns |
| CHB756 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| WU2 | versus | CHB1058 | ns | ||
‡ = Mouse was significantly more susceptible to strain
ns = non-significant
Differences between CHB756, WU2, and CHB1058 were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA with the Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Post-Test.
Sp Strains used for Mouse Infections: Capsule Quantification Relative to WU2.
| Strain ID | Serotype | Capsule Quantification (%) | Colony Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHB756 | 3 | 428 | Highly Mucoid |
| CHB1128 | 3 | 122 | Intermediately Mucoid |
| WU2 | 3 | 100 | Less Mucoid |
| CHB1058 | 19A | N/A | Non-Mucoid |
‡Percentages were normalized to WU2
*Because Stains-All does not give the same intensity of staining capsules of different structures, a direct comparison by Stains-All of 19A with type 3 capsule was not made.
Fig 3Lung histopathology after intranasal infection with mucoid SP isolates CHB756 and WU2.
Control WT-mice (n = 2) (A) and CFTR–/– mice (n = 2) (B) were left untreated. Lung histology of mucoid Sp infection was assessed in WT-mice (n = 2) (C) and CFTR–/– mice (n = 2) (D) 24 hours after intra-nasal infection with 1x105 CFU CHB756.