| Literature DB >> 26469863 |
Evida A Dennis1, Mamie T Coats2, Sarah E Griffin1, Joanetha Y Hale1, Lea Novak3, David E Briles4, Marilyn J Crain4.
Abstract
Recent studies have reported the isolation of highly mucoid serotype 3 Species">Streptococcus pneumoniae (Sp) from the respiEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26469863 PMCID: PMC4607445 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140335
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The effect of CFTR on bacterial clearance.
CFTR–/– mice (solid boxes) and WT- mice (open boxes) were infected with 7x105 CFU of Sp strain CHB756, CHB1058, or WU2 (n = 8–10) or 1x105 CFU of Sp strain CHB1126 (n = 6). CFUs were quantified from lung homogenates (A) and BAL fluid (B) 5 days post-infection. Each data point represents one mouse. The horizontal lines indicate the median for each group. CFTR–/– mice and WT-mice were directly compared for each strain using the Mann- Whitney (two-tailed) Test on ranked data (as described in the methods). P-values are for comparisons between WT and CFTR–/– mice in each treatment group, Experiments were repeated at least twice. P-values ≥ 0.05 are not shown. Statistical comparisons between results with different challenge strains are listed in Table 2.
Fig 2Cytokine production after intranasal infection with mucoid Sp isolate CHB756.
CFTR–/– mice and WT-mice were infected with 1x105 CFU of bacteria (n = 6–7). CFUs were quantified from lung homogenates (A) and BAL fluid (B) 24 hours post-infection. TNF-α production was measured by ELISA in lung homogenates (C) in BAL (D). CXCL1/KC production was measured by ELISA in lung homogenates (E) and in BAL (F). Each dot represents the data for one mouse. The horizontal lines indicate the median for each group. Experiments were repeated at least twice. P-values≥ 0.05 are not shown.
Comparison of CFU recovered from BAL and Lung Homogenates from CFTR–/– and WT-mice infected with serotype 3 and 19A isolates of SP from CF patients.
| Mice | Sample | Comparison |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFTR–/– | Lung Homogenate | CHB756 | versus | WU2 |
|
| CHB756 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| WU2 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| CFTR–/– | BAL | CHB756 | versus | WU2 |
|
| CHB756 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| WU2 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| WT | Lung Homogenate | CHB756 | versus | WU2 | ns |
| CHB756 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| WU2 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| WT | BAL | CHB756 | versus | WU2 | ns |
| CHB756 | versus | CHB1058 |
| ||
| WU2 | versus | CHB1058 | ns | ||
‡ = Mouse was significantly more susceptible to strain
ns = non-significant
Differences between CHB756, WU2, and CHB1058 were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA with the Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Post-Test.
Sp Strains used for Mouse Infections: Capsule Quantification Relative to WU2.
| Strain ID | Serotype | Capsule Quantification (%) | Colony Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHB756 | 3 | 428 | Highly Mucoid |
| CHB1128 | 3 | 122 | Intermediately Mucoid |
| WU2 | 3 | 100 | Less Mucoid |
| CHB1058 | 19A | N/A | Non-Mucoid |
‡Percentages were normalized to WU2
*Because Stains-All does not give the same intensity of staining capsules of different structures, a direct comparison by Stains-All of 19A with type 3 capsule was not made.
Fig 3Lung histopathology after intranasal infection with mucoid SP isolates CHB756 and WU2.
Control WT-mice (n = 2) (A) and CFTR–/– mice (n = 2) (B) were left untreated. Lung histology of mucoid Sp infection was assessed in WT-mice (n = 2) (C) and CFTR–/– mice (n = 2) (D) 24 hours after intra-nasal infection with 1x105 CFU CHB756.