Literature DB >> 26469298

Integration of electronic nose technology with spirometry: validation of a new approach for exhaled breath analysis.

R de Vries1, P Brinkman, M P van der Schee, N Fens, E Dijkers, S K Bootsma, F H C de Jongh, P J Sterk.   

Abstract

New 'omics'-technologies have the potential to better define airway disease in terms of pathophysiological and clinical phenotyping. The integration of electronic nose (eNose) technology with existing diagnostic tests, such as routine spirometry, can bring this technology to 'point-of-care'. We aimed to determine and optimize the technical performance and diagnostic accuracy of exhaled breath analysis linked to routine spirometry. Exhaled breath was collected in triplicate in healthy subjects by an eNose (SpiroNose) based on five identical metal oxide semiconductor sensor arrays (three arrays monitoring exhaled breath and two reference arrays monitoring ambient air) at the rear end of a pneumotachograph. First, the influence of flow, volume, humidity, temperature, environment, etc, was assessed. Secondly, a two-centre case-control study was performed using diagnostic and monitoring visits in day-to-day clinical care in patients with a (differential) diagnosis of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or lung cancer. Breathprint analysis involved signal processing, environment correction based on alveolar gradients and statistics based on principal component (PC) analysis, followed by discriminant analysis (Matlab2014/SPSS20). Expiratory flow showed a significant linear correlation with raw sensor deflections (R(2)  =  0.84) in 60 healthy subjects (age 43  ±  11 years). No correlation was found between sensor readings and exhaled volume, humidity and temperature. Exhaled data after environment correction were highly reproducible for each sensor array (Cohen's Kappa 0.81-0.94). Thirty-seven asthmatics (41  ±  14.2 years), 31 COPD patients (66  ±  8.4 years), 31 lung cancer patients (63  ±  10.8 years) and 45 healthy controls (41  ±  12.5 years) entered the cross-sectional study. SpiroNose could adequately distinguish between controls, asthma, COPD and lung cancer patients with cross-validation values ranging between 78-88%. We have developed a standardized way to integrate eNose technology with spirometry. Signal processing techniques and environmental background correction ensured that the multiple sensor arrays within the SpiroNose provided repeatable and interchangeable results. SpiroNose discriminated controls and patients with asthma, COPD and lung cancer with promising accuracy, paving the route towards point-of-care exhaled breath diagnostics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26469298     DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/9/4/046001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breath Res        ISSN: 1752-7155            Impact factor:   3.262


  21 in total

Review 1.  Electronic Nose Technology in Respiratory Diseases.

Authors:  Silvano Dragonieri; Giorgio Pennazza; Pierluigi Carratu; Onofrio Resta
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 2.  Diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome by exhaled breath analysis.

Authors:  Lieuwe D J Bos
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

Review 3.  Breath Analysis: A Promising Tool for Disease Diagnosis-The Role of Sensors.

Authors:  Maria Kaloumenou; Evangelos Skotadis; Nefeli Lagopati; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Dimitris Tsoukalas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Body Composition-Specific Asthma Phenotypes: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Ke Deng; Yulai Yuan; Lei Liu; Shuwen Zhang; Changyong Wang; Gang Wang; Hongping Zhang; Lei Wang; Gaiping Cheng; Lisa G Wood; Gang Wang
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.706

5.  Diagnostic Performance of Electronic Noses in Cancer Diagnoses Using Exhaled Breath: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Max H M C Scheepers; Zaid Al-Difaie; Lloyd Brandts; Andrea Peeters; Bart van Grinsven; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 6.  Evolution of clinical and environmental health applications of exhaled breath research: Review of methods and instrumentation for gas-phase, condensate, and aerosols.

Authors:  M Ariel Geer Wallace; Joachim D Pleil
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 7.  Omics for the future in asthma.

Authors:  Mahmoud I Abdel-Aziz; Anne H Neerincx; Susanne J Vijverberg; Aletta D Kraneveld; Anke H Maitland-van der Zee
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 9.623

8.  Factors Influencing Continuous Breath Signal in Intubated and Mechanically-Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients Measured by an Electronic Nose.

Authors:  Jan Hendrik Leopold; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Camilla Colombo; Peter J Sterk; Marcus J Schultz; Lieuwe D J Bos
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  A Review of Analytical Techniques and Their Application in Disease Diagnosis in Breathomics and Salivaomics Research.

Authors:  David J Beale; Oliver A H Jones; Avinash V Karpe; Saravanan Dayalan; Ding Yuan Oh; Konstantinos A Kouremenos; Warish Ahmed; Enzo A Palombo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Electronic Nose as a Novel Method for Diagnosing Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chiara Baldini; Lucia Billeci; Francesco Sansone; Raffaele Conte; Claudio Domenici; Alessandro Tonacci
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.