Mark G Shrime1, Bart S Ferket2, Daniel J Scott3, Joon Lee4, Diana Barragan-Bradford5, Tom Pollard3, Yaseen M Arabi6, Hasan M Al-Dorzi6, Rebecca M Baron5, M G Myriam Hunink7, Leo A Celi8, Peggy S Lai9. 1. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 2Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands 4Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 3. Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. 5. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts8Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Intensive Care Department, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia10King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 7. Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands 11Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 8. Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts8Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 9. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts12Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Time-limited trials of intensive care are commonly used in patients perceived to have a poor prognosis. The optimal duration of such trials is unknown. Factors such as a cancer diagnosis are associated with clinician pessimism and may affect the decision to limit care independent of a patient's severity of illness. OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal duration of intensive care for short-term mortality in critically ill patients with cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Decision analysis using a state-transition microsimulation model was performed to simulate the hospital course of patients with poor-prognosis primary tumors, metastatic disease, or hematologic malignant neoplasms admitted to medical and surgical intensive care units. Transition probabilities were derived from 920 participants stratified by sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores to identify severity of illness. The model was validated in 3 independent cohorts with 349, 158, and 117 participants from quaternary care academic hospitals. Monte Carlo microsimulation was performed, followed by probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Outcomes were assessed in the overall cohort and in solid tumors alone. INTERVENTIONS: Time-unlimited vs time-limited trials of intensive care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: 30-day all-cause mortality and mean survival duration. RESULTS: The SOFA scores at ICU admission were significantly associated with mortality. A 3-, 8-, or 15-day trial of intensive care resulted in decreased mean 30-day survival vs aggressive care in all but the sickest patients (SOFA score, 5-9: 48.4% [95% CI, 48.0%-48.8%], 60.6% [95% CI, 60.2%-61.1%], and 66.8% [95% CI, 66.4%-67.2%], respectively, vs 74.6% [95% CI, 74.3%-75.0%] with time-unlimited aggressive care; SOFA score, 10-14: 36.2% [95% CI, 35.8%-36.6%], 44.1% [95% CI, 43.6%-44.5%], and 46.1% [95% CI, 45.6%-46.5%], respectively, vs 48.4% [95% CI, 48.0%-48.8%] with aggressive care; SOFA score, ≥ 15: 5.8% [95% CI, 5.6%-6.0%], 8.1% [95% CI, 7.9%-8.3%], and 8.3% [95% CI, 8.1%-8.6%], respectively, vs 8.8% [95% CI, 8.5%-9.0%] with aggressive care). However, the clinical magnitude of these differences was variable. Trial durations of 8 days in the sickest patients offered mean survival duration that was no more than 1 day different from time-unlimited care, whereas trial durations of 10 to 12 days were required in healthier patients. For the subset of patients with solid tumors, trial durations of 1 to 4 days offered mean survival that was not statistically significantly different from time-unlimited care. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Trials of ICU care lasting 1 to 4 days may be sufficient in patients with poor-prognosis solid tumors, whereas patients with hematologic malignant neoplasms or less severe illness seem to benefit from longer trials of intensive care.
IMPORTANCE: Time-limited trials of intensive care are commonly used in patients perceived to have a poor prognosis. The optimal duration of such trials is unknown. Factors such as a cancer diagnosis are associated with clinician pessimism and may affect the decision to limit care independent of a patient's severity of illness. OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal duration of intensive care for short-term mortality in critically illpatients with cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Decision analysis using a state-transition microsimulation model was performed to simulate the hospital course of patients with poor-prognosis primary tumors, metastatic disease, or hematologic malignant neoplasms admitted to medical and surgical intensive care units. Transition probabilities were derived from 920 participants stratified by sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores to identify severity of illness. The model was validated in 3 independent cohorts with 349, 158, and 117 participants from quaternary care academic hospitals. Monte Carlo microsimulation was performed, followed by probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Outcomes were assessed in the overall cohort and in solid tumors alone. INTERVENTIONS: Time-unlimited vs time-limited trials of intensive care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: 30-day all-cause mortality and mean survival duration. RESULTS: The SOFA scores at ICU admission were significantly associated with mortality. A 3-, 8-, or 15-day trial of intensive care resulted in decreased mean 30-day survival vs aggressive care in all but the sickest patients (SOFA score, 5-9: 48.4% [95% CI, 48.0%-48.8%], 60.6% [95% CI, 60.2%-61.1%], and 66.8% [95% CI, 66.4%-67.2%], respectively, vs 74.6% [95% CI, 74.3%-75.0%] with time-unlimited aggressive care; SOFA score, 10-14: 36.2% [95% CI, 35.8%-36.6%], 44.1% [95% CI, 43.6%-44.5%], and 46.1% [95% CI, 45.6%-46.5%], respectively, vs 48.4% [95% CI, 48.0%-48.8%] with aggressive care; SOFA score, ≥ 15: 5.8% [95% CI, 5.6%-6.0%], 8.1% [95% CI, 7.9%-8.3%], and 8.3% [95% CI, 8.1%-8.6%], respectively, vs 8.8% [95% CI, 8.5%-9.0%] with aggressive care). However, the clinical magnitude of these differences was variable. Trial durations of 8 days in the sickest patients offered mean survival duration that was no more than 1 day different from time-unlimited care, whereas trial durations of 10 to 12 days were required in healthier patients. For the subset of patients with solid tumors, trial durations of 1 to 4 days offered mean survival that was not statistically significantly different from time-unlimited care. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Trials of ICU care lasting 1 to 4 days may be sufficient in patients with poor-prognosis solid tumors, whereas patients with hematologic malignant neoplasms or less severe illness seem to benefit from longer trials of intensive care.
Authors: E Azoulay; D Moreau; C Alberti; G Leleu; C Adrie; M Barboteu; P Cottu; V Levy; J R Le Gall; B Schlemmer Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Graeme Rocker; Deborah Cook; Peter Sjokvist; Bruce Weaver; Simon Finfer; Ellen McDonald; John Marshall; Anne Kirby; Mitchell Levy; Peter Dodek; Daren Heyland; Gordon Guyatt Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Derek C Angus; Amber E Barnato; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; Lisa A Weissfeld; R Scott Watson; Tim Rickert; Gordon D Rubenfeld Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Dominique D Benoit; Koenraad H Vandewoude; Johan M Decruyenaere; Eric A Hoste; Francis A Colardyn Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Frank Daniel Martos-Benítez; Andrés Soto-García; Anarelys Gutiérrez-Noyola Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2018-01-23 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Elie Azoulay; Peter Schellongowski; Michael Darmon; Philippe R Bauer; Dominique Benoit; Pieter Depuydt; Jigeeshu V Divatia; Virginie Lemiale; Maarten van Vliet; Anne-Pascale Meert; Djamel Mokart; Stephen M Pastores; Anders Perner; Frédéric Pène; Peter Pickkers; Kathryn A Puxty; Francois Vincent; Jorge Salluh; Ayman O Soubani; Massimo Antonelli; Thomas Staudinger; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Marcio Soares Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Martin Dres; David Hajage; Said Lebbah; Antoine Kimmoun; Tai Pham; Gaëtan Béduneau; Alain Combes; Alain Mercat; Bertrand Guidet; Alexandre Demoule; Matthieu Schmidt Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: M G Kiehl; G Beutel; B Böll; D Buchheidt; R Forkert; V Fuhrmann; P Knöbl; M Kochanek; F Kroschinsky; P La Rosée; T Liebregts; C Lück; U Olgemoeller; E Schalk; A Shimabukuro-Vornhagen; W R Sperr; T Staudinger; M von Bergwelt Baildon; P Wohlfarth; V Zeremski; P Schellongowski Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 3.673
Authors: Christopher Meiring; Abhishek Dixit; Steve Harris; Niall S MacCallum; David A Brealey; Peter J Watkinson; Andrew Jones; Simon Ashworth; Richard Beale; Stephen J Brett; Mervyn Singer; Ari Ercole Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 3.240