Stefan Schandelmaier1, Erik von Elm, John J You, Anette Blümle, Yuki Tomonaga, Francois Lamontagne, Ramon Saccilotto, Alain Amstutz, Theresa Bengough, Joerg J Meerpohl, Mihaela Stegert, Kelechi K Olu, Kari A O Tikkinen, Ignacio Neumann, Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Markus Faulhaber, Sohail M Mulla, Dominik Mertz, Elie A Akl, Xin Sun, Dirk Bassler, Jason W Busse, Ignacio Ferreira-González, Alain Nordmann, Viktoria Gloy, Heike Raatz, Lorenzo Moja, Rachel Rosenthal, Shanil Ebrahim, Per O Vandvik, Bradley C Johnston, Martin A Walter, Bernard Burnand, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Lars G Hemkens, Deborah J Cook, Maureen O Meade, Heiner C Bucher, Benjamin Kasenda, Matthias Briel. 1. 1Department of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.2Department of Medicine, Academy of Swiss Insurance Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.3Cochrane Switzerland, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.4Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.5Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.6German Cochrane Centre, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.7Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.8Centre de Recherche Clinique du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.9Department of Health and Society, Austrian Federal Institute for Health Care, Vienna, Austria.10Departments of Urology and Public Health, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.11Department of Internal Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.12Evidence-Based Dentistry Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.13Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Diseases Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.14Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.15Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.16Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.17Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.18Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.19Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.20Epidemiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital and CIBER de Epidem
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Randomized clinical trials that enroll patients in critical or emergency care (acute care) setting are challenging because of narrow time windows for recruitment and the inability of many patients to provide informed consent. To assess the extent that recruitment challenges lead to randomized clinical trial discontinuation, we compared the discontinuation of acute care and nonacute care randomized clinical trials. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort of 894 randomized clinical trials approved by six institutional review boards in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada between 2000 and 2003. SETTING: Randomized clinical trials involving patients in an acute or nonacute care setting. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We recorded trial characteristics, self-reported trial discontinuation, and self-reported reasons for discontinuation from protocols, corresponding publications, institutional review board files, and a survey of investigators. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 894 randomized clinical trials, 64 (7%) were acute care randomized clinical trials (29 critical care and 35 emergency care). Compared with the 830 nonacute care randomized clinical trials, acute care randomized clinical trials were more frequently discontinued (28 of 64, 44% vs 221 of 830, 27%; p = 0.004). Slow recruitment was the most frequent reason for discontinuation, both in acute care (13 of 64, 20%) and in nonacute care randomized clinical trials (7 of 64, 11%). Logistic regression analyses suggested the acute care setting as an independent risk factor for randomized clinical trial discontinuation specifically as a result of slow recruitment (odds ratio, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.72-9.31) after adjusting for other established risk factors, including nonindustry sponsorship and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Acute care randomized clinical trials are more vulnerable to premature discontinuation than nonacute care randomized clinical trials and have an approximately four-fold higher risk of discontinuation due to slow recruitment. These results highlight the need for strategies to reliably prevent and resolve slow patient recruitment in randomized clinical trials conducted in the critical and emergency care setting.
OBJECTIVES: Randomized clinical trials that enroll patients in critical or emergency care (acute care) setting are challenging because of narrow time windows for recruitment and the inability of many patients to provide informed consent. To assess the extent that recruitment challenges lead to randomized clinical trial discontinuation, we compared the discontinuation of acute care and nonacute care randomized clinical trials. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort of 894 randomized clinical trials approved by six institutional review boards in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada between 2000 and 2003. SETTING: Randomized clinical trials involving patients in an acute or nonacute care setting. SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS: We recorded trial characteristics, self-reported trial discontinuation, and self-reported reasons for discontinuation from protocols, corresponding publications, institutional review board files, and a survey of investigators. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 894 randomized clinical trials, 64 (7%) were acute care randomized clinical trials (29 critical care and 35 emergency care). Compared with the 830 nonacute care randomized clinical trials, acute care randomized clinical trials were more frequently discontinued (28 of 64, 44% vs 221 of 830, 27%; p = 0.004). Slow recruitment was the most frequent reason for discontinuation, both in acute care (13 of 64, 20%) and in nonacute care randomized clinical trials (7 of 64, 11%). Logistic regression analyses suggested the acute care setting as an independent risk factor for randomized clinical trial discontinuation specifically as a result of slow recruitment (odds ratio, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.72-9.31) after adjusting for other established risk factors, including nonindustry sponsorship and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Acute care randomized clinical trials are more vulnerable to premature discontinuation than nonacute care randomized clinical trials and have an approximately four-fold higher risk of discontinuation due to slow recruitment. These results highlight the need for strategies to reliably prevent and resolve slow patient recruitment in randomized clinical trials conducted in the critical and emergency care setting.
Authors: Alison E Turnbull; Sarina K Sahetya; E Lee Daugherty Biddison; Christiane S Hartog; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Dominique D Benoit; Bertrand Guidet; Rik T Gerritsen; Mark R Tonelli; J Randall Curtis Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Daniël Pv Lambrichts; Pim P Edomskis; Ruben D van der Bogt; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Willem A Bemelman; Johan F Lange Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Rachael L Morley; Matthew J Edmondson; Ceri Rowlands; Jane M Blazeby; Robert J Hinchliffe Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-07-07 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: L Beasant; A Brigden; R M Parslow; H Apperley; T Keep; A Northam; C Wray; H King; R Langdon; N Mills; B Young; E Crawley Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2019-02-19