X Liu1, A Silverman2, M Kern3, B D Ward1, S-J Li1, R Shaker3, M R Sood2. 1. Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 2. Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The neural network mechanisms underlying visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are incompletely understood. It has been proposed that an intrinsic salience network plays an important role in chronic pain and IBS symptoms. Using neuroimaging, we examined brain responses to rectal distension in adolescent IBS patients, focusing on determining the alteration of salience network integrity in IBS and its functional implications in current theoretical frameworks. We hypothesized that (i) brain responses to visceral stimulation in adolescents are similar to those in adults, and (ii) IBS is associated with an altered salience network interaction with other neurocognitive networks, particularly the default mode network (DMN) and executive control network (ECN), as predicted by the theoretical models. METHODS: Irritable bowel syndrome patients and controls received subliminal and liminal rectal distension during imaging. Stimulus-induced brain activations were determined. Salience network integrity was evaluated by the functional connectivity of its seed regions activated by rectal distension in the insular and cingulate cortices. KEY RESULTS: Compared with controls, IBS patients demonstrated greater activation to rectal distension in neural structures of the homeostatic afferent and emotional arousal networks, especially the anterior cingulate and insular cortices. Greater brain responses to liminal vs subliminal distension were observed in both groups. Particularly, IBS is uniquely associated with an excessive coupling of the salience network with the DMN and ECN in their key frontal and parietal node areas. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Our study provided consistent evidence supporting the theoretical predictions of altered salience network functioning as a neuropathological mechanism of IBS symptoms.
BACKGROUND: The neural network mechanisms underlying visceral hypersensitivity inirritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are incompletely understood. It has been proposed that an intrinsic salience network plays an important role in chronic pain and IBS symptoms. Using neuroimaging, we examined brain responses to rectal distension in adolescent IBSpatients, focusing on determining the alteration of salience network integrity in IBS and its functional implications in current theoretical frameworks. We hypothesized that (i) brain responses to visceral stimulation in adolescents are similar to those in adults, and (ii) IBS is associated with an altered salience network interaction with other neurocognitive networks, particularly the default mode network (DMN) and executive control network (ECN), as predicted by the theoretical models. METHODS:Irritable bowel syndromepatients and controls received subliminal and liminal rectal distension during imaging. Stimulus-induced brain activations were determined. Salience network integrity was evaluated by the functional connectivity of its seed regions activated by rectal distension in the insular and cingulate cortices. KEY RESULTS: Compared with controls, IBSpatients demonstrated greater activation to rectal distension in neural structures of the homeostatic afferent and emotional arousal networks, especially the anterior cingulate and insular cortices. Greater brain responses to liminal vs subliminal distension were observed in both groups. Particularly, IBS is uniquely associated with an excessive coupling of the salience network with the DMN and ECN in their key frontal and parietal node areas. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Our study provided consistent evidence supporting the theoretical predictions of altered salience network functioning as a neuropathological mechanism of IBS symptoms.
Authors: A Vania Apkarian; Yamaya Sosa; Beth R Krauss; P Sebastian Thomas; Bruce E Fredrickson; Robert E Levy; R Norman Harden; Dante R Chialvo Journal: Pain Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: E A Mayer; Q Aziz; S Coen; M Kern; J S Labus; R Lane; B Kuo; B Naliboff; I Tracey Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Loren H Ketai; Yuko M Komesu; Andrew B Dodd; Rebecca G Rogers; Josef M Ling; Andrew R Mayer Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Natoshia R Cunningham; Hadas Nahman-Averbuch; Gregory R Lee; Christopher D King; Robert C Coghill Journal: Pain Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Jeannie S Huang; Laura Terrones; Alan N Simmons; Walter Kaye; Irina Strigo Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Ravi R Bhatt; Arpana Gupta; Jennifer S Labus; Lonnie K Zeltzer; Jennie C Tsao; Robert J Shulman; Kirsten Tillisch Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2019 Feb/Mar Impact factor: 3.864
Authors: Catherine S Hubbard; Lino Becerra; Nicole Heinz; Allison Ludwick; Tali Rasooly; Rina Wu; Adriana Johnson; Neil L Schechter; David Borsook; Samuel Nurko Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Nasser H Kashou; Irfaan A Dar; Mohamed A El-Mahdy; Charles Pluto; Mark Smith; Ish K Gulati; Warren Lo; Sudarshan R Jadcherla Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 3.418