| Literature DB >> 26467824 |
Jane M Hughes1, Joel A Huey2, Alison J McLean3, Olivier Baggiano4.
Abstract
Studies of connectivity of natural populations are often conducted at different timescales. Studies that focus on contemporary timescales ask questions about dispersal abilities and dispersal behavior of their study species. In contrast, studies conducted at historical timescales are usually more focused on evolutionary or biogeographic questions. In this paper we present a synthesis of connectivity studies that have addressed both these timescales in Australian Trichoptera and Ephemeroptera. We conclude that: (1) For both groups, the major mechanism of dispersal is by adult flight, with larval drift playing a very minor role and with unusual patterns of genetic structure at fine scales explained by the "patchy recruitment hypothesis"; (2) There is some evidence presented to suggest that at slightly larger spatial scales (~100 km) caddisflies may be slightly more connected than mayflies; (3) Examinations of three species at historical timescales showed that, in southeast Queensland Australia, despite there being no significant glaciation during the Pleistocene, there are clear impacts of Pleistocene climate changes on their genetic structure; and (4) The use of mitochondrial DNA sequence data has uncovered a number of cryptic species complexes in both trichopterans and ephemeropterans. We conclude with a number of suggestions for further work.Entities:
Keywords: Australia; Ephemeroptera; Trichoptera; gene flow; phylogeography; stream hierarchy model
Year: 2011 PMID: 26467824 PMCID: PMC4553437 DOI: 10.3390/insects2040447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Figure 1Predictions for population genetic variation under two contrasting demographic models; the Stream Hierarchy Model and the Patchy Recruitment Model (A–C); (D) Shows different interpretations of deviations from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium. Red squares indicate significant deviations.
Figure 2Scatter plot showing correlation between genetic distance and geographic scale of study for nine species of Ephemeroptera (red circles) and Trichoptera (blue triangles).
Figure 3(A) Map of Conondale (north) and Lamington (south) regions; (B) Cytochrome Oxidase 1 haplotype networks for three species sampled in both north and south regions [29-31]; (C) We used a hierarchical Approximate Bayesian Computation method, analyzed with MTML-msbayes [38], to estimate the number of divergence events (Ψ) that can explain the shared pylogeographic break in these three co-distributed taxa. Within the msbayes pipeline, we simulated 1,000,000 datasets (parameterized by random draws from predefined ranges) and calculated 23 different summary statistics from each dataset to create a prior distribution. The same summary statistics were calculated for our observed datasets (based on the CO1 region of the mtDNA molecule) and compared to the simulated summary statistics to generate posterior distributions for the variance of τ (time since divergence), average τ and Ψ. The posterior distributions shown here for E(τ) and Ψ were estimated using the local regression method. For the histogram describing Ψ, the red bars show the posterior distribution while the black bars show the prior distribution. For a more detailed explanation of msbayes see [12,38,39].
Figure 4Phylogenies for two ephemeropteran taxa, Altophlebia spp. (top) and Bungona narilla (bottom), and the geographic distributions of cryptic species. The sampled region is identical to Figure 3.