Literature DB >> 26467641

Comparison of early haemodynamics of 19-mm aortic valve bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic annulus.

Satoru Domoto1, Hiroshi Niinami2, Kazuhiko Uwabe2, Hiroyuki Koike2, Mimiko Tabata2, Kozo Morita2, Masaru Kambe2, Atsushi Iguchi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A potential problem in aortic valve replacement (AVR) for patients with a small aortic annulus is prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). Although larger size prostheses have been well studied, the haemodynamics of 19-mm bioprostheses has been reported in only a small number of patients. The Trifecta valve is a novel bioprosthesis and its unique design is conceived to increase effective orifice area (EOA) and prevent PPM. This study aims at comparing the early haemodynamics of the new Trifecta valve with that of other conventional 19-mm valves.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 128 consecutive patients who underwent AVR with 19-mm bioprosthesis (39 Trifecta valve, 67 Magna Ease valve and 22 Mosaic Ultra valve) at Saitama International Medical Center between April 2012 and December 2014. Haemodynamics was evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography at 1 month after discharge and at 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS: The average body surface area of all patients was 1.37 m(2). There was no difference in postoperative clinical outcomes between the three groups. Among the three groups, the mean pressure gradient (MPG) was the smallest (10.6 ± 4.3 mmHg, P < 0.001) and the EOA was the largest (1.63 ± 0.36 cm(2), P < 0.001) in the Trifecta group at 1 month after discharge. In the Trifecta group, PPM was not observed (P < 0.001), the MPG was the smallest (12.8 ± 3.6 mmHg, P < 0.001) and the EOA was the largest (1.50 ± 0.30 cm(2), P < 0.001) at the 1-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The new 19-mm Trifecta valve showed favourable early haemodynamics compared with the conventional valves and may be useful for preventing PPM in patients with a small aortic annulus.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement; Effective orifice area; Pressure gradient; Prosthesis-patient mismatch; Trifecta valve

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26467641     DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivv284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  2 in total

1.  Long-Term Results (up to 20 Years) of 19 mm or Smaller Prostheses in the Aortic Position. Does Size Matter? A Propensity-Matched Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Horea Feier; Andrei Grigorescu; Lucian Falnita; Oana Rachita; Marian Gaspar; Constantin T Luca
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  A Retrospective Comparison of Hemodynamic and Clinical Outcomes between Two Differently Designed Aortic Bioprostheses for Small Aortic Annuli.

Authors:  Do Jung Kim; Sak Lee; Hyun-Chel Joo; Young-Nam Youn; Kyung-Jong Yoo; Seung Hyun Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.