Literature DB >> 26467390

Differing perceptions of safety culture across job roles in the ambulatory setting: analysis of the AHRQ Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture.

John Hickner1, Scott A Smith2, Naomi Yount2, Joann Sorra2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experts in patient safety stress the importance of a shared culture of safety. Lack of consensus may be detrimental to patient safety. This study examines differences in patient safety culture perceptions among providers, management and staff in a large national survey of safety culture in ambulatory practices in the USA.
METHODS: The US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS) assesses perceptions about patient safety issues and event reporting in medical offices (ie, ambulatory practices). Using the 2014 data, we analysed responses from medical offices with at least five respondents. We calculated differences in perceptions of patient safety culture across six job positions (physicians, management, nurse practitioners (NPs)/physician assistants (PAs), nurses, clinical support staff and administrative/clerical staff) for 10 survey composites, the average of the 10 composites and an overall patient safety rating using multivariate hierarchical linear regressions.
RESULTS: We analysed data from 828 medical offices with responses from 15 523 providers and staff, with an average 20 completed surveys per medical office (range: 5-367) and an average medical office response rate of 65% (range: 3%-100%). Management had significantly more positive patient safety culture perceptions on nine of 10 composite scores compared with all other job positions, including physicians. The composite that showed the largest difference was Communication Openness; Management (85% positive) was 22% points more positive than other clinical and support staff and administrative/clerical staff. Physicians were significantly more positive than PAs/NPs, nursing staff, other clinical and support staff and administrative/clerical staff on four composites: Communication About Error, Communication Openness, Staff Training and Teamwork, ranging from 3% to 20% points more positive.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that managers need to pay attention to the training needs of office staff, since this was an area with one of the greatest gaps in perceptions. In addition, both office managers and physicians need to encourage more open communication. As medical offices innovate to improve value, efficiency and patient-centred care, it is important that they continue to foster shared perceptions about what organisational members need, understanding that those perceptions may differ systematically by job position. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory care; Medication safety; Patient safety; Safety culture

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26467390     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  9 in total

1.  Patient Safety Culture in a Teaching Hospital in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia: Assessment and Opportunities for Improvement.

Authors:  Afnan Aljaffary; Fatemah Al Yaqoub; Reem Al Madani; Hessa Aldossary; Arwa Alumran
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-09-13

2.  Similarities and differences in the associations between patient safety culture dimensions and self-reported outcomes in two different cultural settings: a national cross-sectional study in Palestinian and Belgian hospitals.

Authors:  Shahenaz Najjar; Elfi Baillien; Kris Vanhaecht; Motasem Hamdan; Martin Euwema; Arthur Vleugels; Walter Sermeus; Ward Schrooten; Johan Hellings; Annemie Vlayen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Patient safety management systems, activities and work environments related to hospital-level patient safety culture: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Shigeru Fujita; Yinghui Wu; Shuhei Iida; Yoji Nagai; Yoshiko Shimamori; Tomonori Hasegawa
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Differences between professionals' views on patient safety culture in long-term and acute care? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mari Liukka; Markku Hupli; Hannele Turunen
Journal:  Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl)       Date:  2021-09-08

5.  Patient safety culture in primary health care: Medical office survey on patient safety culture in a Brazilian family health strategy setting.

Authors:  Gleiton Lima Araújo; Fábio Ferreira Amorim; Rafaela Cristina Pereira Santos de Miranda; Flávio Ferreira Pontes Amorim; Levy Aniceto Santana; Leila Bernarda Donato Göttems
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  SafetyNET Community-based patient safety initiatives: development and application of a Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Survey.

Authors:  Martha Funabashi; Katherine A Pohlman; Silvano Mior; Maeve O'Beirne; Michael Westaway; Diana De Carvalho; Mohamed El-Bayoumi; Bob Haig; Darrell J Wade; Haymo W Thiel; J David Cassidy; Eric Hurwitz; Gregory N Kawchuk; Sunita Vohra
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2018-12

7.  Assessing Building Blocks for Patient Safety Culture-a Quantitative Assessment of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Zeid Alrowely; Omar Ghazi Baker
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2019-12-06

8.  The Patient Safety Culture Scale for Chinese Primary Health Care Institutions: Development, Validity and Reliability.

Authors:  Siyu Cheng; Yinhuan Hu; Holger Pfaff; Chuntao Lu; Qiang Fu; Liuming Wang; Dehe Li; Shixiao Xia
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.243

9.  The Safety Culture of The Ljubljana Community Health Centre's Employees.

Authors:  Špela Tevžič; Antonija Poplas-Susič; Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2021-06-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.