Literature DB >> 26466185

Radiologic Professionalism in Modern Health Care.

Anastasia L Hryhorczuk1, Kate Hanneman1, Ronald L Eisenberg1, Elaine C Meyer1, Stephen D Brown1.   

Abstract

Modern radiology is at the forefront of technological progress in medicine, a position that often places unique challenges on its professional character. This article uses "Medical Professionalism in the New Millennium: A Physician Charter," a document published in 2002 and endorsed by several major radiology organizations, as a lens for exploring professional challenges in modern radiology. The three main tenets of the Charter emphasize patient welfare, patient autonomy, and the reduction of disparities in health care distribution. This article reviews the ways in which modern technology and financial structures potentially create stressors on professionalism in radiology, while highlighting the opportunities they provide for radiologists seeking to fulfill the professional goals articulated in the Charter. Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) and voice recognition systems have transformed the speed of radiology and enhanced the ability of radiologists to improve patient care but also have brought new tensions to the workplace. Although teleradiology may improve global access to radiologists, it may also promote the commoditization of radiology, which diminishes the professional stature of radiologists. Social media and patient portals provide radiologists with new forums for interacting with the public and patients, potentially promoting patient welfare. However, patient privacy and autonomy are important considerations. Finally, modern financial structures provide radiologists with both entrepreneurial opportunities as well as the temptation for unprofessional conduct. Each of these advances carries the potential for professional growth while testing the professional stature of radiology. By considering the risks and benefits of emerging technologies in the modern radiology world, radiologists can chart an ethical and professional future path. © RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26466185     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015150041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  5 in total

1.  An evaluation of patient experience during percutaneous breast biopsy.

Authors:  Jean M Seely; Fraser Hill; Susan Peddle; Jackie Lau
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Implementation of a Software Distribution Intervention to Improve Workload Balance in an Academic Pediatric Radiology Department.

Authors:  Marla B K Sammer; Andrew Stahl; Eray Ozkan; Andrew C Sher
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.903

3.  Difficulties and possibilities in communication between referring clinicians and radiologists: perspective of clinicians.

Authors:  Nabi Fatahi; Ferid Krupic; Mikael Hellström
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2019-07-19

4.  Enhancing patient value efficiently: Medical history interviews create patient satisfaction and contribute to an improved quality of radiologic examinations.

Authors:  Knud Nairz; Ingrid Böhm; Sebastiano Barbieri; Dieter Fiechter; Nicola Hošek; Johannes Heverhagen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A Narrative Review of Factors Historically Influencing Telehealth Use across Six Medical Specialties in the United States.

Authors:  Pavani Rangachari; Swapandeep S Mushiana; Krista Herbert
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.