Literature DB >> 26465226

Effect of the Garrett Lee Smith Memorial Suicide Prevention Program on Suicide Attempts Among Youths.

Lucas Godoy Garraza1, Christine Walrath1, David B Goldston2, Hailey Reid1, Richard McKeon3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Youth suicide prevention is a major public health priority. Studies documenting the effectiveness of community-based suicide prevention programs in reducing the number of nonlethal suicide attempts have been sparse.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a reduction in suicide attempts among youths occurs following the implementation of the Garrett Lee Smith Memorial Suicide Prevention Program (hereafter referred to as the GLS program), consistent with the reduction in mortality documented previously. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted an observational study of community-based suicide prevention programs for youths across 46 states and 12 tribal communities. The study compared 466 counties implementing the GLS program between 2006 and 2009 with 1161 counties that shared key preintervention characteristics but were not exposed to the GLS program. The unweighted rounded numbers of respondents used in this analysis were 84 000 in the control group and 57 000 in the intervention group. We used propensity score-based techniques to increase comparability (on background characteristics) between counties that implemented the GLS program and counties that did not. We combined information on program activities collected by the GLS national evaluation with information on county characteristics from several secondary sources. The data analysis was performed between April and August 2014. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. EXPOSURES: Comprehensive, multifaceted suicide prevention programs, including gatekeeper training, education and mental health awareness programs, screening activities, improved community partnerships and linkages to service, programs for suicide survivors, and crisis hotlines. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Suicide attempt rates for each county following implementation of the GLS program for youths 16 to 23 years of age at the time the program activities were implemented. We obtained this information from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health administered to a large national probabilistic sample between 2008 and 2011.
RESULTS: Counties implementing GLS program activities had significantly lower suicide attempt rates among youths 16 to 23 years of age in the year following implementation of the GLS program than did similar counties that did not implement GLS program activities (4.9 fewer attempts per 1000 youths [95% CI, 1.8-8.0 fewer attempts per 1000 youths]; P = .003). More than 79 000 suicide attempts may have been averted during the period studied following implementation of the GLS program. There was no significant difference in suicide attempt rates among individuals older than 23 years during that same period. There was no evidence of longer-term differences in suicide attempt rates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Comprehensive GLS program activities were associated with a reduction in suicide attempt rates. Sustained suicide prevention programming efforts may be needed to maintain the reduction in suicide attempt rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26465226     DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry        ISSN: 2168-622X            Impact factor:   21.596


  17 in total

1.  Suicide Prevention.

Authors:  Stan Kutcher; Yifeng Wei; Pegah Behzadi
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  Decreases in Suicide Deaths and Attempts Linked to the White Mountain Apache Suicide Surveillance and Prevention System, 2001-2012.

Authors:  Mary F Cwik; Lauren Tingey; Alexandra Maschino; Novalene Goklish; Francene Larzelere-Hinton; John Walkup; Allison Barlow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  School- and Community-Based Youth Suicide Prevention Interventions: Hot Idea, Hot Air, or Sham?

Authors:  Stan Kutcher; Yifeng Wei; Pegah Behzadi
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.356

4.  Long-Term Effectiveness of the Question, Persuade, Refer (QPR) Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training Program: Lessons from Missouri.

Authors:  Clay Litteken; Elizabeth Sale
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2017-08-24

5.  Nonsuicidal Self-Injury and Suicidal Behaviors in Girls: The Case for Targeted Prevention in Preadolescence.

Authors:  Theodore P Beauchaine; Stephen P Hinshaw; Jeffrey A Bridge
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-01-28

6.  Can an Infusion of Federal Funds Result in Sustainable Projects? An Evaluation of Suicide Prevention Programs.

Authors:  Robert Apsler; Scott W Formica; Ellyson Stout; Colleen Carr
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2017-12

7.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of school-based suicide prevention programmes.

Authors:  Susan Ahern; Lee-Ann Burke; Brendan McElroy; Paul Corcoran; Elaine M McMahon; Helen Keeley; Vladimir Carli; Camilla Wasserman; Christina W Hoven; Marco Sarchiapone; Alan Apter; Judit Balazs; Raphaela Banzer; Julio Bobes; Romuald Brunner; Doina Cosman; Christian Haring; Michael Kaess; Jean-Pierre Kahn; Agnes Kereszteny; Vita Postuvan; Pilar A Sáiz; Peeter Varnik; Danuta Wasserman
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Why Are We Not Closing the Gap in Suicide Disparities for Sexual Minority Youth?

Authors:  Brian Mustanski; Dorothy L Espelage
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  Emerging trends in adolescent suicide prevention research.

Authors:  Cheryl A King; Alejandra Arango; Cynthia Ewell Foster
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2017-09-14

10.  What Works in Youth Suicide Prevention? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jo Robinson; Eleanor Bailey; Katrina Witt; Nina Stefanac; Allison Milner; Dianne Currier; Jane Pirkis; Patrick Condron; Sarah Hetrick
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2018-10-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.