Literature DB >> 2646493

The measurement of health status in clinical practice.

E C Nelson1, D M Berwick.   

Abstract

Functional status measurement and the assessment of health status are reaching their maturity as technical disciplines. Good tools exist that meet requirements such as brevity, validity, reliability, ease of administration, and ease of scoring, which make them potentially suitable for use in clinical practice. Despite this progress, widespread adoption of measurement tools has not occurred in the clinical world. The authors analyze both the potential and the barriers to use of health assessment tools in practice and note the need for better scientific evidence of their clinical utility, as opposed to their information content. Dissemination of these tools among practitioners will require, above all, evidence and conviction that the use of measurement instruments will actually enhance the very health status outcomes they assess.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2646493     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  18 in total

1.  Use of the reliable change index to evaluate clinical significance in SF-36 outcomes.

Authors:  Robert J Ferguson; Amy B Robinson; Mark Splaine
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; A Fletcher; S Gore; D Jones; D Spiegelhalter; D Cox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-31

Review 3.  A healthy bottom line: healthy life expectancy as an outcome measure for health improvement efforts.

Authors:  Matthew C Stiefel; Rocco J Perla; Bonnie L Zell
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Responsiveness to change: an aspect of validity, not a separate dimension.

Authors:  R D Hays; D Hadorn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Quality of life assessment by community pharmacists: an exploratory study.

Authors:  J P Bentley; M C Smith; B F Banahan; D A Frate; B R Parks
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Validation of the care notebook for measuring physical, mental and life well-being of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Kunihiko Kobayashi; Joseph Green; Mari Shimonagayoshi; Noriaki Kanemoto; Ryo Kasai; Yoichi Itoh; Yuki Fujiki; Yasuo Ohashi; Carolyn Gotay; Shoji Kudoh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Reliability and Sensitivity of the Foot and Ankle Disability Index in Subjects With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Sheri A Hale; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Quality and cost improvement of healthcare via complementary measurement and diagnosis of patient general health outcome using electronic health record data: research rationale and design.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Stusser; Richard A Dickey
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Reliability and validity of the COOP/WONCA health status measure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  K Stavem; H Jodalen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  The relationship of changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores to ratings on the Subjective Significance Questionnaire in men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  G Rodrigues; A Bezjak; D Osoba; P Catton; D Tsuji; D Taylor; P Warde
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.