Literature DB >> 26464398

Detecting Secondary Caries Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

F Brouwer1, H Askar1, S Paris1, F Schwendicke2.   

Abstract

Secondary caries lesions are the main late complication of dental restorations, limiting their life span and generating costs by repeated reinterventions. Accurate detection of secondary lesions is crucial for estimating the true burden of the disease and allocating appropriate treatments. We aimed to assess the accuracy of detection methods for secondary caries lesions. Clinical or in vitro studies were included that investigated the accuracy of 5 detection methods--visual, tactile, radiography, laser fluorescence, quantitative light-induced fluorescence--of natural or artificially induced secondary lesions, as verified against an established reference test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as diagnostic odds ratios were calculated and publication bias assessed. From 1,179 screened studies, 23 were included. Most studies were performed in vitro, on permanent posterior teeth, and had high risk of bias or applicability concerns. Lesions were on proximal (14 studies) or other surfaces and adjacent to amalgam (16 studies) or tooth-colored materials. Visual (n = 11), radiographic (n = 13), and laser fluorescence detection (n = 8) had similar sensitivities (0.50 to 0.59) and specificities (0.78 to 0.83), with visual and laser fluorescence assessment being more accurate on nonproximal surfaces and adjacent to composites, respectively. Tactile assessment (n = 7) had low accuracy. Light-induced fluorescence (n = 3) was sensitive on nonproximal surfaces but had low specificities. Most analyses seemed to suffer from publication bias. Despite being a significant clinical and dental public health problem, detection of secondary caries lesions has been assessed by only a few studies with limited validity and applicability. Visual, radiographic and laser-fluorescence detection might be useful to detect secondary lesions. The validity of tactile assessment and quantitative light-induced fluorescence remains unclear at present. © International & American Associations for Dental Research 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caries detection/diagnosis; dental decay; diagnostic systems; diagnostic tests; evidence-based dentistry; radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26464398     DOI: 10.1177/0022034515611041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  17 in total

1.  Risk factors for failure in the management of cervical caries lesions.

Authors:  R J Wierichs; E J Kramer; H Meyer-Lueckel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A randomized clinical trial of class II composite restorations using direct and semidirect techniques.

Authors:  Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres; Mariane Cintra Mailart; Érica Crastechini; Fernanda Alves Feitosa; Stella Renato Machado Esteves; Rebeca Di Nicoló; Alessandra Bühler Borges
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Attitudes, practice, and experience of German dentists regarding repair restorations.

Authors:  Philipp Kanzow; Robin Hoffmann; Claudia Tschammler; Jochen Kruppa; Tina Rödig; Annette Wiegand
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  A new arginine-based dental adhesive system: formulation, mechanical and anti-caries properties.

Authors:  Saulo Geraldeli; Eveline F Soares; Andres J Alvarez; Tanaz Farivar; Robert C Shields; Mario A C Sinhoreti; Marcelle M Nascimento
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro.

Authors:  Gerd Göstemeyer; Mareike Preus; Karim Elhennawy; Falk Schwendicke; Sebastian Paris; Haitham Askar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Bacterial Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to Dental Material Surfaces.

Authors:  Mirjam Kozmos; Petra Virant; Franc Rojko; Anže Abram; Rebeka Rudolf; Peter Raspor; Anamarija Zore; Klemen Bohinc
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Tests to detect and inform the diagnosis of root caries.

Authors:  Patrick A Fee; Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-07

8.  Salivary Biomarkers for Dental Caries Detection and Personalized Monitoring.

Authors:  Pune N Paqué; Christopher Herz; Daniel B Wiedemeier; Konstantinos Mitsakakis; Thomas Attin; Kai Bao; Georgios N Belibasakis; John P Hays; Joël S Jenzer; Wendy E Kaman; Michal Karpíšek; Philipp Körner; Johannes R Peham; Patrick R Schmidlin; Thomas Thurnheer; Florian J Wegehaupt; Nagihan Bostanci
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-03-23

9.  Reconfigurable Dual Peptide Tethered Polymer System Offers a Synergistic Solution for Next Generation Dental Adhesives.

Authors:  Esra Yuca; Sheng-Xue Xie; Linyong Song; Kyle Boone; Nilan Kamathewatta; Sarah K Woolfolk; Philip Elrod; Paulette Spencer; Candan Tamerler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Prevention of tooth loss and dental pain for reducing the global burden of oral diseases.

Authors:  Susan Hyde; Veronique Dupuis; Boipelo P Mariri; Sophie Dartevelle
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.607

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.