Michael Hombach1, Carlos Ochoa2, Florian P Maurer3, Tamara Pfiffner3, Erik C Böttger3, Reinhard Furrer2. 1. Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Universität Zürich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland mhombach@imm.uzh.ch. 2. Institut für Mathematik, Universität Zürich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Universität Zürich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Disc diffusion is still largely based on manual procedures. Technical variations originate from inoculum preparation, variations in materials, individual operator plate streaking and reading accuracy. Resulting measurement imprecision contributes to categorization errors. Biological variation resembles the natural fluctuation of a measured parameter such as antibiotic susceptibility around a mean value. It is deemed to originate from factors such as genetic background or metabolic state. This study analysed the relative contribution of different technical and biological factors to total disc diffusion variation. METHODS: For calculation of relative error factor contribution to disc diffusion variability, five experiments were designed keeping different combinations of error factors constant. A mathematical model was developed to analyse the individual error factor contribution to disc diffusion variation for each of the tested drug-species combinations. RESULTS: The contribution of biological variation to total diameter variance ranged from 10.4% to 98.8% for different drug-species combinations. Highest biological variation was found for Enterococcus faecalis WT and vancomycin (98.8%) and for penicillinase-producing Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin G (96.0%). Average imprecision of automated zone reading revealed that 1.4%-5.3% of total imprecision was due to technical variation, while materials, i.e. antibiotic discs and agar plates, contributed between 2.6% and 3.9%. Inoculum preparation and manual plate streaking contributed 6.8%-24.8% and 6.6%-24.3%, respectively, to total imprecision. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the relative contributions of technical factors that account for a significant part of total variance in disc diffusion. The highest relative contribution originated from the operator, i.e. manual inoculum preparation and plate streaking. Further standardization of inoculum preparation and plate streaking by automation could potentially increase the precision of disc diffusion and improve the correlation of susceptibility reports with clinical outcome.
OBJECTIVES: Disc diffusion is still largely based on manual procedures. Technical variations originate from inoculum preparation, variations in materials, individual operator plate streaking and reading accuracy. Resulting measurement imprecision contributes to categorization errors. Biological variation resembles the natural fluctuation of a measured parameter such as antibiotic susceptibility around a mean value. It is deemed to originate from factors such as genetic background or metabolic state. This study analysed the relative contribution of different technical and biological factors to total disc diffusion variation. METHODS: For calculation of relative error factor contribution to disc diffusion variability, five experiments were designed keeping different combinations of error factors constant. A mathematical model was developed to analyse the individual error factor contribution to disc diffusion variation for each of the tested drug-species combinations. RESULTS: The contribution of biological variation to total diameter variance ranged from 10.4% to 98.8% for different drug-species combinations. Highest biological variation was found for Enterococcus faecalis WT and vancomycin (98.8%) and for penicillinase-producing Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin G (96.0%). Average imprecision of automated zone reading revealed that 1.4%-5.3% of total imprecision was due to technical variation, while materials, i.e. antibiotic discs and agar plates, contributed between 2.6% and 3.9%. Inoculum preparation and manual plate streaking contributed 6.8%-24.8% and 6.6%-24.3%, respectively, to total imprecision. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the relative contributions of technical factors that account for a significant part of total variance in disc diffusion. The highest relative contribution originated from the operator, i.e. manual inoculum preparation and plate streaking. Further standardization of inoculum preparation and plate streaking by automation could potentially increase the precision of disc diffusion and improve the correlation of susceptibility reports with clinical outcome.
Authors: Romney M Humphries; Susan Kircher; Andrea Ferrell; Kevin M Krause; Rianna Malherbe; Andre Hsiung; C A Burnham Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Hanna Hakvoort; Evelyn Bovenkamp; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Suzannah M Schmidt-Malan; Jay N Mandrekar; Audrey N Schuetz; Robin Patel Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Pablo Catalán; Emily Wood; Jessica M A Blair; Ivana Gudelj; Jonathan R Iredell; Robert E Beardmore Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Sandra Godinho Silva; Patrícia Paula; José Paulo da Silva; Dalila Mil-Homens; Miguel Cacho Teixeira; Arsénio Mendes Fialho; Rodrigo Costa; Tina Keller-Costa Journal: Mar Drugs Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 6.085
Authors: Johanna Seeger; Sebastian Guenther; Katharina Schaufler; Stefan E Heiden; Robin Michelet; Charlotte Kloft Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2021-05-21
Authors: Derry K Mercer; Marcelo D T Torres; Searle S Duay; Emma Lovie; Laura Simpson; Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede; Cesar de la Fuente-Nunez; Deborah A O'Neil; Alfredo M Angeles-Boza Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 5.293