Literature DB >> 31846419

A rapid, point-of-care antibiotic susceptibility test for urinary tract infections.

Melody N Toosky1, Jonathan T Grunwald1, Daniela Pala2, Byron Shen1, Weian Zhao3,4,5,6,7,8, Cartesio D'Agostini9, Ferdinando Coghe10, Giancarlo Angioni11, Guido Motolese2, Timothy J Abram1, Eleonora Nicolai2,9.   

Abstract

Introduction. The alarming rise in urinary tract infection (UTI) antimicrobial resistance has resulted from a combination of high prevalence, low specificity and the lack of a rapid, point-of-care (POC) antibiotic susceptibility test (AST), which has led to the overuse/inappropriate use of antibiotics.Aim. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a rapid POC phenotypic AST device in reporting susceptibility information within 2 h.Methodology. Instrument calibration was performed with model bacteria and fluorescent microbeads to determine the dynamic range and limit of detection for quantifying concentrations of bacteria and demonstrate the ability to rapidly differentiate susceptible and resistant model bacteria. We then evaluated 30 presumptive UTI-positive patient urine samples in a clinical pilot study using a panel of 5 common UTI antibiotics plus a growth control and compared our results to the hospital standard of care AST.Results. Our device was able to robustly detect and quantify bacteria concentrations from 50 to 105 colony-forming units (c.f.u.) ml-1. The high sensitivity of this measurement technique enabled the device to differentiate between susceptible and resistant model bacteria with 100 % specificity over a 2 h growth period. In the clinical pilot study, an overall categorical agreement (CA) of 90.7 % was observed (sensitivity=91.4 %, specificity=88.9 %, n=97) with performance for individual drugs ranging from 85 % CA (ceftazidime) to 100 % (nitrofurantoin).Conclusions. By reducing the typical timeframe for susceptibility testing from 2-3 days to 2 h, our POC phenotypic AST can provide critical information to clinicians prior to the administration of antibiotic therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AST; UTI; antimicrobial resistance; cell counting; diagnostics; point of care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31846419      PMCID: PMC7440674          DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.001119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  32 in total

1.  An epidemic of urinary tract infections?

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Sampath Kumar; Ankur Dave; Brian Wolf; Edgar V Lerma
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.800

3.  Rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing using nanoliter arrays.

Authors:  Jonathan Avesar; Dekel Rosenfeld; Marianna Truman-Rosentsvit; Tom Ben-Arye; Yuval Geffen; Moran Bercovici; Shulamit Levenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Next-generation antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Alex van Belkum; W Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Effect of mixed cultures on antibiotic susceptibility testing.

Authors:  A Shahidi; P D Ellner
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1969-11

6.  The Slow March toward Rapid Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Christopher D Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Urinary tract infection: self-reported incidence and associated costs.

Authors:  B Foxman; R Barlow; H D'Arcy; B Gillespie; J D Sobel
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll; Brian D Glanz; Anita P Borek; Chad Burger; Hasan S Bhally; Susan Henciak; Diane Flayhart
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  The evolving role of chemical synthesis in antibacterial drug discovery.

Authors:  Peter M Wright; Ian B Seiple; Andrew G Myers
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 15.336

10.  Why Can't We Just Use PCR? The Role of Genotypic versus Phenotypic Testing for Antimicrobial Resistance Testing.

Authors:  Jennifer Dien Bard; Francesca Lee
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Newsl       Date:  2018-05-22
View more
  4 in total

1.  Envisioning Future Urinary Tract Infection Diagnostics.

Authors:  Robin Patel; Christopher R Polage; Jennifer Dien Bard; Larissa May; Francesca M Lee; Valeria Fabre; Mary K Hayden; Sarah D B Doernberg; David A Haake; Barbara W Trautner; Larissa Grigoryan; Ephraim L Tsalik; Kimberly E Hanson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 20.999

2.  3D-Printed Dip Slides Miniaturize Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Tests Allowing Direct Mastitis Sample Analysis.

Authors:  Tai The Diep; Samuel Bizley; Alexander Daniel Edwards
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.523

3.  Evaluation of a New Culture-Based AtbFinder Test-System Employing a Novel Nutrient Medium for the Selection of Optimal Antibiotics for Critically Ill Patients with Polymicrobial Infections within 4 h.

Authors:  George Tetz; Victor Tetz
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-04

4.  A dual-caged resorufin probe for rapid screening of infections resistant to lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  Jinghang Xie; Ran Mu; Mingxi Fang; Yunfeng Cheng; Fiona Senchyna; Angel Moreno; Niaz Banaei; Jianghong Rao
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 9.825

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.