Literature DB >> 26461188

Labor Dystocia: Uses of Related Nomenclature.

Jeremy L Neal, Sharon L Ryan, Nancy K Lowe, Mavis N Schorn, Margaret Buxton, Sharon L Holley, Angela M Wilson-Liverman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Labor dystocia (slow or difficult labor or birth) is the most commonly diagnosed aberration of labor and the most frequently documented indication for primary cesarean birth. Yet, dystocia remains a poorly specified diagnostic category, with determinations often varying widely among clinicians. The primary aims of this review are to 1) summarize definitions of active labor and dystocia, as put forth by leading professional obstetric and midwifery organizations in world regions wherein English is the majority language and 2) describe the use of dystocia and related terms in contemporary research studies.
METHODS: Major national midwifery and obstetric organizations from qualifying United Nations-member sovereign nations and international organizations were searched to identify guidelines providing definitions of active labor and dystocia or related terms. Research studies (2000-2013) were systematically identified via PubMed, MEDLINE, and CINAHL searches to describe the use of dystocia and related terms in contemporary scientific publications.
RESULTS: Only 6 organizational guidelines defined dystocia or related terms. Few research teams (n = 25 publications) defined dystocia-related terms with nonambiguous clinical parameters that can be applied prospectively. There is heterogeneity in the nomenclature used to describe dystocia, and when a similar term is shared between guidelines or research publications, the underlying definition of that term is sometimes inconsistent between documents. DISCUSSION: Failure to define dystocia in evidence-based, well-described, clinically meaningful terms that are widely acceptable to and reproducible among clinicians and researchers is concerning at both national and global levels. This failure is particularly problematic in light of the major contribution of this diagnosis to primary cesarean birth rates.
© 2015 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  first; labor stage; pregnancy; labor; obstetric; labor onset; labor stage; second; trial of labor; parturition; pregnancy outcome; dystocia; oxytocin; cesarean section

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26461188     DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  5 in total

1.  The association between longer durations of the latent phase of labor and subsequent perinatal processes and outcomes among midwifery patients.

Authors:  Ellen L Tilden; Julia C Phillippi; Nicole Carlson; Mekhala Dissanayake; Christopher S Lee; Aaron B Caughey; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Comparing Different Partograph Designs for Use in Standard Labor Care: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Nigel J Lee; Jeremy Neal; Nancy K Lowe; Sue V Kildea
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-03

Review 3.  Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term.

Authors:  Gill Moncrieff; Gillian Ml Gyte; Hannah G Dahlen; Gill Thomson; Mandisa Singata-Madliki; Andrew Clegg; Soo Downe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-03-04

4.  Women's views and experiences of augmentation of labour with synthetic oxytocin infusion. A protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Silvia Alòs-Pereñíguez; Deirdre O'Malley; Deirdre Daly
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2022-04-20

5.  Impact of labor characteristics on maternal and neonatal outcomes of labor: A machine-learning model.

Authors:  Sherif A Shazly; Bijan J Borah; Che G Ngufor; Vanessa E Torbenson; Regan N Theiler; Abimbola O Famuyide
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.