Literature DB >> 26458968

Development, validity and reliability of the 'Sitting Balance Measure' (SBM) in spinal cord injury.

G Wadhwa1, R Aikat2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This is a methodological research design.
OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord injury (SCI) may result in the inability to sit unsupported. This may lead to difficulty performing daily living activities. To make the subjects with SCI independent in their daily living to the maximum possible extent, therapists provide them balance training for which they may require to assess the sitting balance. This study aims to develop an objective measure 'Sitting Balance Measure' (SBM) for the assessment of sitting balance of the subjects with SCI, and to determine its content validity and internal consistency reliability.
SETTING: This study was conducted in New Delhi, India.
METHODS: The study was conducted in three phases, namely planning, construction and quantitative evaluation phase. Thirty-six items were generated through the review of literature and semistructured interviews. Qualitative and quantitative content validation through the expert opinion and the content validity ratio (CVR) method resulted in the 24-item scale, which was pilot-tested on a purposive sample of 30 subjects with SCI. Item analysis was conducted to determine internal consistency reliability.
RESULTS: CVR method and qualitative review by the experts validated the content of SBM. The SBM has high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.96).
CONCLUSION: SBM is a valid scale for the assessment of sitting balance in subjects with SCI. Internal consistency reliability of SBM is high. This may be indicative of item redundancy, which necessitates the need for the second pilot test to refine the scale further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26458968     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  5 in total

1.  Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency.

Authors:  David L Streiner
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2003-02

2.  Development and content validation of family practice residency recruitment questionnaires.

Authors:  Lorraine Silver Wallace; Gregory H Blake; Jon S Parham; Ruth E Baldridge
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 3.  Essential elements of questionnaire design and development.

Authors:  Janice Rattray; Martyn C Jones
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.036

4.  A guide for instrument development and validation.

Authors:  J Benson; F Clark
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  1982-12

5.  The relationship between sitting stability and functional performance in patients with paraplegia.

Authors:  Chiung-Ling Chen; Kwok-Tak Yeung; Liu-Ing Bih; Chun-Hou Wang; Ming-I Chen; Jung-Chung Chien
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.966

  5 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Instruments for Measuring Unsupported Sitting Balance in Subjects with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Libak Abou; Gabriel Ribeiro de Freitas; Juliete Palandi; Jocemar Ilha
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2018-02-12

2.  Test-retest reliability and validity of the Sitting Balance Measure-Korean in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  JunMin Lee; SeungHeon An; OnYoo Kim; GyuMin Kang; Myungki Kim
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.473

3.  Development and validation of the sitting balance assessment for spinal cord injury (SitBASCI).

Authors:  Piero Artuso; Tatiana Bianconi; Alessia Guizzardi; Barbara Bandini; Enrico Grotto; Andrea Guazzini; Gianluca Sampogna; Francesca Caoduro; Michele Spinelli; Giannettore Bertagnoni
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.473

4.  The robotic Trunk-Support-Trainer (TruST) to measure and increase postural workspace during sitting in people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Victor Santamaria; Tatiana Luna; Moiz Khan; Sunil Agrawal
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2020-01-06

5.  Reliability and minimal detectable change of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS) and the trunk control test for individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Hiroki Sato; Kazuhiro Miyata; Kenichi Yoshikawa; Shinogu Kusano; Masafumi Mizukami
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2022-03-12

Review 6.  Clinical proteomics of enervated neurons.

Authors:  Mohor Biplab Sengupta; Arunabha Chakrabarti; Suparna Saha; Debashis Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.988

7.  Development of the Finnish neurological function testing battery for dogs and its intra- and inter-rater reliability.

Authors:  Anna Fredrika Boström; Heli Katariina Hyytiäinen; Petteri Koho; Sigitas Cizinauskas; Anna Katrina Hielm-Björkman
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 1.695

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.