Janice Rattray1, Martyn C Jones. 1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. j.z.rattray@dundee.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS: The aims of this paper were (1) to raise awareness of the issues in questionnaire development and subsequent psychometric evaluation, and (2) to provide strategies to enable nurse researchers to design and develop their own measure and evaluate the quality of existing nursing measures. BACKGROUND: The number of questionnaires developed by nurses has increased in recent years. While the rigour applied to the questionnaire development process may be improving, we know that nurses are still not generally adept at the psychometric evaluation of new measures. This paper explores the process by which a reliable and valid questionnaire can be developed. METHODS: We critically evaluate the theoretical and methodological issues associated with questionnaire design and development and present a series of heuristic decision-making strategies at each stage of such development. The range of available scales is presented and we discuss strategies to enable item generation and development. The importance of stating a priori the number of factors expected in a prototypic measure is emphasized. Issues of reliability and validity are explored using item analysis and exploratory factor analysis and illustrated using examples from recent nursing research literature. CONCLUSION: Questionnaire design and development must be supported by a logical, systematic and structured approach. To aid this process we present a framework that supports this and suggest strategies to demonstrate the reliability and validity of the new and developing measure. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: In developing the evidence base of nursing practice using this method of data collection, it is vital that questionnaire design incorporates preplanned methods to establish reliability and validity. Failure to develop a questionnaire sufficiently may lead to difficulty interpreting results, and this may impact upon clinical or educational practice. This paper presents a critical evaluation of the questionnaire design and development process and demonstrates good practice at each stage of this process.
AIMS: The aims of this paper were (1) to raise awareness of the issues in questionnaire development and subsequent psychometric evaluation, and (2) to provide strategies to enable nurse researchers to design and develop their own measure and evaluate the quality of existing nursing measures. BACKGROUND: The number of questionnaires developed by nurses has increased in recent years. While the rigour applied to the questionnaire development process may be improving, we know that nurses are still not generally adept at the psychometric evaluation of new measures. This paper explores the process by which a reliable and valid questionnaire can be developed. METHODS: We critically evaluate the theoretical and methodological issues associated with questionnaire design and development and present a series of heuristic decision-making strategies at each stage of such development. The range of available scales is presented and we discuss strategies to enable item generation and development. The importance of stating a priori the number of factors expected in a prototypic measure is emphasized. Issues of reliability and validity are explored using item analysis and exploratory factor analysis and illustrated using examples from recent nursing research literature. CONCLUSION: Questionnaire design and development must be supported by a logical, systematic and structured approach. To aid this process we present a framework that supports this and suggest strategies to demonstrate the reliability and validity of the new and developing measure. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: In developing the evidence base of nursing practice using this method of data collection, it is vital that questionnaire design incorporates preplanned methods to establish reliability and validity. Failure to develop a questionnaire sufficiently may lead to difficulty interpreting results, and this may impact upon clinical or educational practice. This paper presents a critical evaluation of the questionnaire design and development process and demonstrates good practice at each stage of this process.
Authors: Sebastiano A G Lava; Giacomo D Simonetti; Alessandra Ferrarini; Gian Paolo Ramelli; Mario G Bianchetti Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Clarissa Vasconcellos de Souza; Afonso Celso Vigorito; Eliana C M Miranda; Celso Garcia; Vergílio Antonio Rensi Colturato; Marcos Augusto Mauad; Maria Cláudia Rodrigues Moreira; Luis Fernando da Silva Bouzas; Simone Lermontov; Nelson Hamerschlak; Morgani Rodrigues; Jose Carlos de Almeida Barros; Ricardo Chiattone; Stephanie J Lee; Mary E D Flowers Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Eliana D da Costa; Camila Pinelli; Elaine P da Silva Tagliaferro; José E Corrente; Glaucia M B Ambrosano Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Franco M Impellizzeri; Mario Bizzini; Michael Leunig; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Anne F Mannion Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 3.134