Literature DB >> 26458729

Hierarchical non-negative matrix factorization to characterize brain tumor heterogeneity using multi-parametric MRI.

Nicolas Sauwen1,2, Diana M Sima1,2, Sofie Van Cauter3, Jelle Veraart4,5, Alexander Leemans6, Frederik Maes2,7, Uwe Himmelreich8, Sabine Van Huffel1,2.   

Abstract

Tissue characterization in brain tumors and, in particular, in high-grade gliomas is challenging as a result of the co-existence of several intra-tumoral tissue types within the same region and the high spatial heterogeneity. This study presents a method for the detection of the relevant tumor substructures (i.e. viable tumor, necrosis and edema), which could be of added value for the diagnosis, treatment planning and follow-up of individual patients. Twenty-four patients with glioma [10 low-grade gliomas (LGGs), 14 high-grade gliomas (HGGs)] underwent a multi-parametric MRI (MP-MRI) scheme, including conventional MRI (cMRI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and short-TE (1)H MRSI. MP-MRI parameters were derived: T2, T1 + contrast, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean kurtosis (MK) and the principal metabolites lipids (Lip), lactate (Lac), N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA), total choline (Cho), etc. Hierarchical non-negative matrix factorization (hNMF) was applied to the MP-MRI parameters, providing tissue characterization on a patient-by-patient and voxel-by-voxel basis. Tissue-specific patterns were obtained and the spatial distribution of each tissue type was visualized by means of abundance maps. Dice scores were calculated by comparing tissue segmentation derived from hNMF with the manual segmentation by a radiologist. Correlation coefficients were calculated between each pathologic tissue source and the average feature vector within the corresponding tissue region. For the patients with HGG, mean Dice scores of 78%, 85% and 83% were obtained for viable tumor, the tumor core and the complete tumor region. The mean correlation coefficients were 0.91 for tumor, 0.97 for necrosis and 0.96 for edema. For the patients with LGG, a mean Dice score of 85% and mean correlation coefficient of 0.95 were found for the tumor region. hNMF was also applied to reduced MRI datasets, showing the added value of individual MRI modalities.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamic contrast methods; head and neck cancer; high-order diffusion MR methods; multimodality imaging; non-negative matrix factorization; spectroscopic imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26458729     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  14 in total

1.  Comparing fully automated state-of-the-art cerebellum parcellation from magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Aaron Carass; Jennifer L Cuzzocreo; Shuo Han; Carlos R Hernandez-Castillo; Paul E Rasser; Melanie Ganz; Vincent Beliveau; Jose Dolz; Ismail Ben Ayed; Christian Desrosiers; Benjamin Thyreau; José E Romero; Pierrick Coupé; José V Manjón; Vladimir S Fonov; D Louis Collins; Sarah H Ying; Chiadi U Onyike; Deana Crocetti; Bennett A Landman; Stewart H Mostofsky; Paul M Thompson; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Convexity-constrained and nonnegativity-constrained spherical factorization in diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Daan Christiaens; Stefan Sunaert; Paul Suetens; Frederik Maes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Modeling and interpreting mesoscale network dynamics.

Authors:  Ankit N Khambhati; Ann E Sizemore; Richard F Betzel; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Application of non-negative matrix factorization in oncology: one approach for establishing precision medicine.

Authors:  Ryuji Hamamoto; Ken Takasawa; Hidenori Machino; Kazuma Kobayashi; Satoshi Takahashi; Amina Bolatkan; Norio Shinkai; Akira Sakai; Rina Aoyama; Masayoshi Yamada; Ken Asada; Masaaki Komatsu; Koji Okamoto; Hirokazu Kameoka; Syuzo Kaneko
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 13.994

5.  Comparison of unsupervised classification methods for brain tumor segmentation using multi-parametric MRI.

Authors:  N Sauwen; M Acou; S Van Cauter; D M Sima; J Veraart; F Maes; U Himmelreich; E Achten; S Van Huffel
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  The successive projection algorithm as an initialization method for brain tumor segmentation using non-negative matrix factorization.

Authors:  Nicolas Sauwen; Marjan Acou; Halandur N Bharath; Diana M Sima; Jelle Veraart; Frederik Maes; Uwe Himmelreich; Eric Achten; Sabine Van Huffel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Semi-automated brain tumor segmentation on multi-parametric MRI using regularized non-negative matrix factorization.

Authors:  Nicolas Sauwen; Marjan Acou; Diana M Sima; Jelle Veraart; Frederik Maes; Uwe Himmelreich; Eric Achten; Sabine Van Huffel
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Rank-Two NMF Clustering for Glioblastoma Characterization.

Authors:  Aymen Bougacha; Ines Njeh; Jihene Boughariou; Omar Kammoun; Kheireddine Ben Mahfoudh; Mariem Dammak; Chokri Mhiri; Ahmed Ben Hamida
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.682

9.  Automated brain tumour detection and segmentation using superpixel-based extremely randomized trees in FLAIR MRI.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Soltaninejad; Guang Yang; Tryphon Lambrou; Nigel Allinson; Timothy L Jones; Thomas R Barrick; Franklyn A Howe; Xujiong Ye
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  An Automated Segmentation Pipeline for Intratumoural Regions in Animal Xenografts Using Machine Learning and Saturation Transfer MRI.

Authors:  Wilfred W Lam; Wendy Oakden; Elham Karami; Margaret M Koletar; Leedan Murray; Stanley K Liu; Ali Sadeghi-Naini; Greg J Stanisz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.