Literature DB >> 26457029

Expanding the view of a standard colonoscope with the Third Eye Panoramic cap.

Moshe Rubin1, Leigh Lurie1, Konika Bose1, Sang H Kim1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate a new imaging device for colonoscopy that adds two side viewing CMOS lenses, the Third Eye Panoramic cap.
METHODS: In this prospective observational feasibility study, 33 patients, 18 male and 15 female, underwent routine screening, surveillance or diagnostic colonoscopy with the new Third Eye Panoramic cap clipped on to the distal tip of a high definition Fuji EC530-LS Slim Colonoscope. All procedures were performed at the New York Presbyterian-Queens Endoscopy unit by two experienced endoscopists (Rubin M and Kim SH). Main outcome measurements included evaluation of the image quality of the Third Eye Panoramic cap, adenoma detection rate, cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time and total procedure time.
RESULTS: The Third Eye Panoramic cap enabled enhanced views without affecting the quality of the colonoscope's image or its handling characteristics through the colon. Ileal intubation was accomplished in most cases, but was more challenging. The side view lenses detected polyps and diverticula hidden behind folds and in flexures not seen on the standard view. The side view lenses were easily cleaned utilizing an Endogator Irrigation Pump (Medivators, Minneapolis, MN, United States) by angling the scope tip against the mucosa while washing. The cecum was reached in all 33 patients. Mean cecal intubation time was 8.19 ± 2.17 min, mean withdrawal time was 10.15 ± 5.56 min and mean total procedure time was 20.31 ± 5.14 min. The overall adenoma detection rate was 44%.
CONCLUSION: The Third Eye Panoramic cap enables wide view colonoscopy with enhanced visualization utilizing standard forward view colonoscopes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma detection rate; Colonoscopy; Endoscopic technology; Endoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26457029      PMCID: PMC4588091          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i37.10683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  11 in total

1.  Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial.

Authors:  Ian M Gralnek; Peter D Siersema; Zamir Halpern; Ori Segol; Alaa Melhem; Alain Suissa; Erwin Santo; Alan Sloyer; Jay Fenster; Leon M G Moons; Vincent K Dik; Ralph B D'Agostino; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Miss rate of right-sided colon examination during colonoscopy defined by retroflexion: an observational study.

Authors:  David G Hewett; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Emerging technological advancements in colonoscopy: Third Eye® Retroscope® and Third Eye® Panoramic(TM) , Fuse® Full Spectrum Endoscopy® colonoscopy platform, Extra-Wide-Angle-View colonoscope, and NaviAid(TM) G-EYE(TM) balloon colonoscope.

Authors:  Ian M Gralnek
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 7.559

4.  Retrograde-viewing device improves adenoma detection rate in colonoscopies for surveillance and diagnostic workup.

Authors:  Peter D Siersema; Amit Rastogi; Anke M Leufkens; Paul A Akerman; Kassem Azzouzi; Richard I Rothstein; Frank P Vleggaar; Alessandro Repici; Giacomo Rando; Patrick I Okolo; Olivier Dewit; Ana Ignjatovic; Elizabeth Odstrcil; James East; Pierre H Deprez; Brian P Saunders; Anthony N Kalloo; Bradley Creel; Vikas Singh; Anne Marie Lennon; Daniel C DeMarco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Cancer statistics, 2015.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Global cancer statistics.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Jaroslaw Regula; Ewa Kraszewska; Marcin Polkowski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Joanna Didkowska; Maria Zwierko; Maciej Rupinski; Marek P Nowacki; Eugeniusz Butruk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study.

Authors:  Anke M Leufkens; Daniel C DeMarco; Amit Rastogi; Paul A Akerman; Kassem Azzouzi; Richard I Rothstein; Frank P Vleggaar; Alessandro Repici; Giacomo Rando; Patrick I Okolo; Olivier Dewit; Ana Ignjatovic; Elizabeth Odstrcil; James East; Pierre H Deprez; Brian P Saunders; Anthony N Kalloo; Bradley Creel; Vikas Singh; Anne Marie Lennon; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Pamela A Nugent; Pauline A Mysliwiec; J Richard Choi; William R Schindler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death.

Authors:  Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Jeffrey K Lee; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Jolanda de Boer; Bruce H Fireman; Joanne E Schottinger; Virginia P Quinn; Nirupa R Ghai; Theodore R Levin; Charles P Quesenberry
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Attachment Devices to Aid in Adenoma Detection.

Authors:  Zoe Lawrence; Seth A Gross
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 2.  Can Technology Improve the Quality of Colonoscopy?

Authors:  Selvi Thirumurthi; William A Ross; Gottumukkala S Raju
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-07

Review 3.  Strategies to Increase Adenoma Detection Rates.

Authors:  Eelco C Brand; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

Review 4.  Advances in endoscopy for colorectal polyp detection and classification.

Authors:  Vijeta Pamudurthy; Nayna Lodhia; Vani J A Konda
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-12-18

5.  Autonomous Retroflexion of a Magnetic Flexible Endoscope.

Authors:  Piotr R Slawinski; Addisu Z Taddese; Kyle B Musto; Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2017-02-13

Review 6.  Flexible Gastro-intestinal Endoscopy - Clinical Challenges and Technical Achievements.

Authors:  Niehls Kurniawan; Martin Keuchel
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 7.  New endoscopes and add-on devices to improve colonoscopy performance.

Authors:  Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Georgios Tziatzios; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.