Literature DB >> 26455641

Endocrine resistance in breast cancer--An overview and update.

Robert Clarke1, John J Tyson2, J Michael Dixon3.   

Abstract

Tumors that express detectable levels of the product of the ESR1 gene (estrogen receptor-α; ERα) represent the single largest molecular subtype of breast cancer. More women eventually die from ERα+ breast cancer than from either HER2+ disease (almost half of which also express ERα) and/or from triple negative breast cancer (ERα-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, and HER2-negative). Antiestrogens and aromatase inhibitors are largely indistinguishable from each other in their abilities to improve overall survival and almost 50% of ERα+ breast cancers will eventually fail one or more of these endocrine interventions. The precise reasons why these therapies fail in ERα+ breast cancer remain largely unknown. Pharmacogenetic explanations for Tamoxifen resistance are controversial. The role of ERα mutations in endocrine resistance remains unclear. Targeting the growth factors and oncogenes most strongly correlated with endocrine resistance has proven mostly disappointing in their abilities to improve overall survival substantially, particularly in the metastatic setting. Nonetheless, there are new concepts in endocrine resistance that integrate molecular signaling, cellular metabolism, and stress responses including endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) that provide novel insights and suggest innovative therapeutic targets. Encouraging evidence that drug combinations with CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors can extend recurrence free survival may yet translate to improvements in overall survival. Whether the improvements seen with immunotherapy in other cancers can be achieved in breast cancer remains to be determined, particularly for ERα+ breast cancers. This review explores the basic mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapies, concluding with some new insights from systems biology approaches further implicating autophagy and the UPR in detail, and a brief discussion of exciting new avenues and future prospects.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiestrogens; Autophagy; Breast cancer; Computational biology; Endocrine resistance; Systems biology; Tamoxifen; Unfolded protein response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26455641      PMCID: PMC4684757          DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.09.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol        ISSN: 0303-7207            Impact factor:   4.102


  201 in total

Review 1.  Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Todd W Miller; Justin M Balko; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A novel ER stress-independent function of the UPR in angiogenesis.

Authors:  Hery Urra; Claudio Hetz
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  The pharmacology and clinical uses of tamoxifen.

Authors:  B J Furr; V C Jordan
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  Dietary genistein negates the inhibitory effect of tamoxifen on growth of estrogen-dependent human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells implanted in athymic mice.

Authors:  Young H Ju; Daniel R Doerge; Kimberly F Allred; Clinton D Allred; William G Helferich
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Molecular and pharmacological aspects of antiestrogen resistance.

Authors:  R Clarke; T C Skaar; K B Bouker; N Davis; Y R Lee; J N Welch; F Leonessa
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 4.292

6.  C-myc gene expression alone is sufficient to confer resistance to antiestrogen in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Marcello Venditti; Barbara Iwasiow; F William Orr; Robert P C Shiu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Dynamics of genomic clones in breast cancer patient xenografts at single-cell resolution.

Authors:  Peter Eirew; Adi Steif; Jaswinder Khattra; Gavin Ha; Damian Yap; Hossein Farahani; Karen Gelmon; Stephen Chia; Colin Mar; Adrian Wan; Emma Laks; Justina Biele; Karey Shumansky; Jamie Rosner; Andrew McPherson; Cydney Nielsen; Andrew J L Roth; Calvin Lefebvre; Ali Bashashati; Camila de Souza; Celia Siu; Radhouane Aniba; Jazmine Brimhall; Arusha Oloumi; Tomo Osako; Alejandra Bruna; Jose L Sandoval; Teresa Algara; Wendy Greenwood; Kaston Leung; Hongwei Cheng; Hui Xue; Yuzhuo Wang; Dong Lin; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Yongjun Zhao; Julie Lorette; Long Nguyen; David Huntsman; Connie J Eaves; Carl Hansen; Marco A Marra; Carlos Caldas; Sohrab P Shah; Samuel Aparicio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Endocrine effects of adjuvant letrozole + triptorelin compared with tamoxifen + triptorelin in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Emanuela Rossi; Alessandro Morabito; Ermelinda De Maio; Francesca Di Rella; Giuseppe Esposito; Adriano Gravina; Vincenzo Labonia; Gabriella Landi; Francesco Nuzzo; Carmen Pacilio; Maria Carmela Piccirillo; Giuseppe D'Aiuto; Massimiliano D'Aiuto; Massimo Rinaldo; Gerardo Botti; Ciro Gallo; Francesco Perrone; Andrea de Matteis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Breast tumor PDXs are genetically plastic and correspond to a subset of aggressive cancers prone to relapse.

Authors:  Stanislas du Manoir; Béatrice Orsetti; Rui Bras-Gonçalves; Tien-Tuan Nguyen; Laurence Lasorsa; Florence Boissière; Blandine Massemin; Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo; Frédéric Bibeau; William Jacot; Charles Theillet
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Jim Ingle; Alan Coates; John Forbes; Judith Bliss; Marc Buyse; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Marco Colleoni; Charles Coombes; Claire Snowdon; Michael Gnant; Raimund Jakesz; Manfred Kaufmann; Francesco Boccardo; Jon Godwin; Christina Davies; Richard Peto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  110 in total

Review 1.  Anticipatory UPR Activation: A Protective Pathway and Target in Cancer.

Authors:  David J Shapiro; Mara Livezey; Liqun Yu; Xiaobin Zheng; Neal Andruska
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 12.015

2.  Disrupting a negative feedback loop drives endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer.

Authors:  Charles E Foulds
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Efficacy of fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant advanced breast cancer in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  I Blancas; M Fontanillas; V Conde; J Lao; E Martínez; M J Sotelo; A Jaen; J L Bayo; F Carabantes; J J Illarramendi; M M Gordon; J Cruz; A García-Palomo; C Mendiola; E Pérez-Ruiz; J S Bofill; J M Baena-Cañada; N M Jáñez; G Esquerdo; M Ruiz-Borrego
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  LRG1 mRNA expression in breast cancer associates with PIK3CA genotype and with aromatase inhibitor therapy outcome.

Authors:  Diana E Ramirez-Ardila; Kirsten Ruigrok-Ritstier; Jean C Helmijr; Maxime P Look; Steven van Laere; Luc Dirix; Els M J J Berns; Maurice P H M Jansen
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Impact of estrogen receptor α on the tamoxifen response and prognosis in luminal-A-like and luminal-B-like breast cancer.

Authors:  Nataliya Babyshkina; Sergey Vtorushin; Tatyana Dronova; Stanislav Patalyak; Elena Slonimskaya; Julia Kzhyshkowska; Nadejda Cherdyntseva; Evgeny Choynzonov
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 6.  MicroRNAs involved in drug resistance of breast cancer by regulating autophagy.

Authors:  Nan Wen; Qing Lv; Zheng-Gui Du
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2020 Sept.       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  Tamoxifen differentially regulates miR-29b-1 and miR-29a expression depending on endocrine-sensitivity in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Penn Muluhngwi; Abirami Krishna; Stephany L Vittitow; Joshua T Napier; Kirsten M Richardson; Mackenzie Ellis; Justin L Mott; Carolyn M Klinge
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  FGFR1 Amplification Mediates Endocrine Resistance but Retains TORC Sensitivity in Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive (HR+) Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joshua Z Drago; Luigi Formisano; Carlos L Arteaga; Aditya Bardia; Dejan Juric; Andrzej Niemierko; Alberto Servetto; Seth A Wander; Laura M Spring; Neelima Vidula; Jerry Younger; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Megan Yuen; Giuliana Malvarosa; Dennis Sgroi; Steven J Isakoff; Beverly Moy; Leif W Ellisen; A John Iafrate
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Opportunities and Challenges for Analyzing Cancer Data at the Inter- and Intra-Institutional Levels.

Authors:  Julie Wu; Jordan Bryan; Samuel M Rubinstein; Lucy Wang; Michele Lenoue-Newton; Raed Zuhour; Mia Levy; Christine Micheel; Yaomin Xu; Suresh K Bhavnani; Lester Mackey; Jeremy L Warner
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-06-25

10.  Short SULF1/SULF2 splice variants predominate in mammary tumours with a potential to facilitate receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated cell signalling.

Authors:  Roop Ms Gill; Vedika Mehra; Emma Milford; Gurtej K Dhoot
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.