Literature DB >> 2645418

Treatment options for proximal ureteral urolithiasis: review and recommendations.

M L Liong1, R V Clayman, R F Gittes, J E Lingeman, J L Huffman, E S Lyon.   

Abstract

The treatment of proximal ureteral calculi has been altered markedly by recent developments in shock wave lithotripsy (bypass, pushback and in situ), ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous stone removal. In an effort to discern the proper role of these newer treatment options with respect to ureterolithotomy (flank approach or dorsal lumbotomy), we completed a multicentered study in which 142 upper ureteral stone patients in 7 different treatment categories were reviewed retrospectively and contacted for convalescence data. From these data we conclude that before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy an upper ureteral stone should be manipulated until it is either pushed back to the kidney or bypassed with a stent. This maneuver should result in successful extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in more than 90 per cent of the patients. For those few patients with an impacted upper ureteral calculus ureterorenoscopy is recommended. Given the presently available treatment modalities we conclude that less than 3 per cent of all upper ureteral calculi will require ureterolithotomy. In this last circumstance a dorsal lumbotomy incision appears to be less morbid and yet as effective as anterior ureterolithotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2645418     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40874-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

1.  The comparison of laparoscopy, shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for large proximal ureteral stones.

Authors:  M D Ufuk Ozturk; Nevzat Can Sener; H N Goksel Goktug; Adnan Gucuk; Ismail Nalbant; M Abdurrahim Imamoglu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Retroperitoneoscopic versus open mini-incision ureterolithotomy for upper- and mid-ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Jai Prakash; Vishwajeet Singh; Manoj Kumar; Manoj Kumar; Rahul Janak Sinha; Satyanarayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Minimally invasive surgical treatment for large impacted upper ureteral stones: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Tarik Yonguc; Burak Arslan; Tansu Degirmenci; Bulent Gunlusoy; Ozgu Aydogdu; Omer Koras
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Meta-analysis of postoperatively stenting or not in patients underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Turun Song; Banghua Liao; Shuo Zheng; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-05-15

5.  ESWL in situ or ureteroscopy for ureteric stones?

Authors:  J Hofbauer; C Tuerk; K Höbarth; R Hasun; M Marberger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semi-rigid ureteroscope with lithoclast.

Authors:  Ehab R Tawfick
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2010-01-28

7.  Flexible ureteroscopic renal stone extraction during laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in patients with large upper ureteral stone and small renal stones.

Authors:  Jae Hyung You; Young Gon Kim; Myung Ki Kim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Experience in 3,500 patients with urinary stones treated with the Dornier HM-4 bath-free lithotriptor.

Authors:  A Kostakopoulos; N I Stavropoulos; G Louras; C Deliveliotis; C Dimopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Ureteral wall thickness at the impacted ureteral stone site: a critical predictor for success rates after SWL.

Authors:  Kemal Sarica; Alper Kafkasli; Özgür Yazici; Ali Cihangir Çetinel; Mehmet Kutlu Demirkol; Murat Tuncer; Cahit Şahin; Bilal Eryildirim
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Management of upper ureteral stones exceeding 15 mm in diameter: Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Hamdy Aboutaleb; Mohamed Omar; Shady Salem; Mohamed Elshazly
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2016-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.