Alistair Nichol1, Craig French2, Lorraine Little3, Samir Haddad4, Jeffrey Presneill5, Yaseen Arabi6, Michael Bailey3, D James Cooper7, Jacques Duranteau8, Olivier Huet9, Anne Mak7, Colin McArthur10, Ville Pettilä11, Markus Skrifvars12, Shirley Vallance7, Dinesh Varma13, Judy Wills7, Rinaldo Bellomo14. 1. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. 2. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: craig.french@wh.org.au. 3. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 4. King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 5. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 6. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 7. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 8. Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Paris, France. 9. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, CHU La Cavale Blanche, Brest, France. 10. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand. 11. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. 12. University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. 13. The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 14. Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Erythropoietin might have neurocytoprotective effects. In this trial, we studied its effect on neurological recovery, mortality, and venous thrombotic events in patients with traumatic brain injury. METHODS:Erythropoietin in Traumatic Brain Injury (EPO-TBI) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial undertaken in 29 centres (all university-affiliated teaching hospitals) in seven countries (Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany, Finland, Ireland, and Saudi Arabia). Within 24 h of brain injury, 606 patients were randomly assigned by a concealed web-based computer-generated randomisation schedule to erythropoietin (40,000 units subcutaneously) or placebo (0·9% sodium chloride subcutaneously) once per week for a maximum of three doses. Randomisation was stratified by severity of traumatic brain injury (moderate vs severe) and participating site. With the exception of designated site pharmacists, the site dosing nurses at all sites, and the pharmacists at the central pharmacy in France, all study personnel, patients, and patients' relatives were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome, assessed at 6 months by modified intention-to-treat analysis, was improvement in the patients' neurological status, summarised as a reduction in the proportion of patients with an Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) of 1-4 (death, vegetative state, and severe disability). Two equally spaced preplanned interim analyses were done (after 202 and 404 participants were enrolled). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00987454. FINDINGS:Between May 3, 2010, and Nov 1, 2014, 606 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to erythropoietin (n=308) or placebo (n=298). Ten of these patients (six in the erythropoietin group and four in the placebo group) were lost to follow up at 6 months; therefore, data for the primary outcome analysis was available for 596 patients (302 in the erythropoietin group and 294 in the placebo group). Compared with placebo, erythropoietin did not reduce the proportion of patients with a GOS-E level of 1-4 (134 [44%] of 302 patients in the erythropoietin group vs 132 [45%] of 294 in the placebo group; relative risk [RR] 0·99 [95% CI 0·83-1·18], p=0·90). In terms of safety, erythropoietin did not significantly affect 6-month mortality versus placebo (32 [11%] of 305 patients had died at 6 months in the erythropoietin group vs 46 [16%] of 297 [16%] in the placebo group; RR 0·68 [95% CI 0·44-1·03], p=0·07) or increase the occurrence of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs (48 [16%] of 305 vs 54 [18%] of 298; RR 0·87 [95% CI 0·61-1·24], p=0·44). INTERPRETATION: Following moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, erythropoietin did not reduce the number of patients with severe neurological dysfunction (GOS-E level 1-4) or increase the incidence of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs. The effect of erythropoietin on mortality remains uncertain. FUNDING: The National Health and Medical Research Council and the Transport Accident Commission.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Erythropoietin might have neurocytoprotective effects. In this trial, we studied its effect on neurological recovery, mortality, and venous thrombotic events in patients with traumatic brain injury. METHODS:Erythropoietin in Traumatic Brain Injury (EPO-TBI) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial undertaken in 29 centres (all university-affiliated teaching hospitals) in seven countries (Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany, Finland, Ireland, and Saudi Arabia). Within 24 h of brain injury, 606 patients were randomly assigned by a concealed web-based computer-generated randomisation schedule to erythropoietin (40,000 units subcutaneously) or placebo (0·9% sodium chloride subcutaneously) once per week for a maximum of three doses. Randomisation was stratified by severity of traumatic brain injury (moderate vs severe) and participating site. With the exception of designated site pharmacists, the site dosing nurses at all sites, and the pharmacists at the central pharmacy in France, all study personnel, patients, and patients' relatives were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome, assessed at 6 months by modified intention-to-treat analysis, was improvement in the patients' neurological status, summarised as a reduction in the proportion of patients with an Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) of 1-4 (death, vegetative state, and severe disability). Two equally spaced preplanned interim analyses were done (after 202 and 404 participants were enrolled). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00987454. FINDINGS: Between May 3, 2010, and Nov 1, 2014, 606 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to erythropoietin (n=308) or placebo (n=298). Ten of these patients (six in the erythropoietin group and four in the placebo group) were lost to follow up at 6 months; therefore, data for the primary outcome analysis was available for 596 patients (302 in the erythropoietin group and 294 in the placebo group). Compared with placebo, erythropoietin did not reduce the proportion of patients with a GOS-E level of 1-4 (134 [44%] of 302 patients in the erythropoietin group vs 132 [45%] of 294 in the placebo group; relative risk [RR] 0·99 [95% CI 0·83-1·18], p=0·90). In terms of safety, erythropoietin did not significantly affect 6-month mortality versus placebo (32 [11%] of 305 patients had died at 6 months in the erythropoietin group vs 46 [16%] of 297 [16%] in the placebo group; RR 0·68 [95% CI 0·44-1·03], p=0·07) or increase the occurrence of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs (48 [16%] of 305 vs 54 [18%] of 298; RR 0·87 [95% CI 0·61-1·24], p=0·44). INTERPRETATION: Following moderate or severe traumatic brain injury, erythropoietin did not reduce the number of patients with severe neurological dysfunction (GOS-E level 1-4) or increase the incidence of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs. The effect of erythropoietin on mortality remains uncertain. FUNDING: The National Health and Medical Research Council and the Transport Accident Commission.
Authors: Karim Asehnoune; Zsolt Balogh; Giuseppe Citerio; Andre Cap; Timothy Billiar; Nino Stocchetti; Mitchell J Cohen; Paolo Pelosi; Nicola Curry; Christine Gaarder; Russell Gruen; John Holcomb; Beverley J Hunt; Nicole P Juffermans; Mark Maegele; Mark Midwinter; Frederick A Moore; Michael O'Dwyer; Jean-François Pittet; Herbert Schöchl; Martin Schreiber; Philip C Spinella; Simon Stanworth; Robert Winfield; Karim Brohi Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-07-29 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jonathan Marehbian; Susanne Muehlschlegel; Brian L Edlow; Holly E Hinson; David Y Hwang Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Dennis W Simon; Mandy J McGeachy; Hülya Bayır; Robert S B Clark; David J Loane; Patrick M Kochanek Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Bedda L Rosario; Christopher M Horvat; Stephen R Wisniewski; Michael J Bell; Ashok Panigrahy; Giulio Zuccoli; Srikala Narayanan; Goundappa K Balasubramani; Sue R Beers; P David Adelson Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: D James Cooper; Alistair D Nichol; Michael Bailey; Stephen Bernard; Peter A Cameron; Sébastien Pili-Floury; Andrew Forbes; Dashiell Gantner; Alisa M Higgins; Olivier Huet; Jessica Kasza; Lynne Murray; Lynette Newby; Jeffrey J Presneill; Stephen Rashford; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Michael Stephenson; Shirley Vallance; Dinesh Varma; Steven A R Webb; Tony Trapani; Colin McArthur Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 56.272