Literature DB >> 2645265

Intrathoracic pressures and left ventricular configuration with respiratory maneuvers.

S M Scharf1, R Brown, K G Warner, S Khuri.   

Abstract

In 12 dogs, we examined the correspondence between esophageal (Pes) and pericardial pressures over the anterior, lateral, and inferior left ventricular (LV) surfaces. Pleural pressure was decreased by spontaneous inspiration, Mueller maneuver, and phrenic stimulation and increased by intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). To separate effects due to blood flow, we analyzed beating and nonbeating hearts. In beating hearts, there were no significant differences between changes in Pes and pericardial pressures. In arrested hearts, increasing LV pressure by 8 Torr increased pericardial pressures by only 3.6 Torr. With IPPV and PEEP, increases in Pes and pericardial pressures were equal in live hearts and in low-volume arrested hearts (LV pressure = 4 Torr). In high-volume arrested hearts (LV pressure = 12 Torr), the increase in pericardial pressure over the anterior LV surface was less than Pes, whereas that over the lateral and inferior LV surfaces was the same as Pes. At high LV volume, in arrested hearts pericardial pressures decreased less than Pes during negative pressure maneuvers. In another six dogs, external LV configuration and volume were measured. In beating hearts during spontaneous inspiration, Mueller maneuver, and phrenic stimulation (endotracheal tube open), septal-lateral dimension and LV volume decreased by approximately 3% (P less than 0.05). This was also true for PEEP. In arrested hearts, septal-lateral dimension and LV volume decreased only with PEEP. We conclude that 1) the relationship between Pes and pericardial pressures is complex and depends on LV volume, local pericardial compliance, and the means by which Pes is changed, 2) changes in measured pericardial pressures did not completely explain changes in LV configuration, and 3) during different respiratory maneuvers, different forces account for the same observed changes in LV volume and configuration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2645265     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1989.66.1.481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  6 in total

1.  Effects of continuous negative extrathoracic pressure ventilation on left ventricular dimensions and hemodynamics in dogs.

Authors:  T Andoh; H Doi; I Kudoh; K Kaneko; Y Okutsu; F Okumura
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Assessment of atrial electromechanical delay and influential factors in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Julide Yagmur; Ozkan Yetkin; Mehmet Cansel; Nusret Acikgoz; Necip Ermis; Yasin Karakus; Hakan Tasolar
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 3.  Cardiovascular effects of airways obstruction.

Authors:  S M Scharf
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  Heart-lung interaction in a model of COPD: importance of lung volume and direct ventricular interaction.

Authors:  William S Cheyne; Alexandra M Williams; Megan I Harper; Neil D Eves
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Effect of tidal volume, sampling duration, and cardiac contractility on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation during positive-pressure ventilation.

Authors:  Hyung Kook Kim; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Evaluation of atrial electromechanical delay and left atrial mechanical function in patients with obstructive sleep apnea : Cardiac involvement in patients with OSA.

Authors:  Turgut Karabag; Mustafa Aydin; Remzi Altin; Sait M Dogan; Cem Cil; Cagatay Buyukuysal; Muhammet R Sayin
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 1.704

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.