Literature DB >> 26452326

Histomorphometric outcomes after lateral sinus floor elevation procedure: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Stefano Corbella1,2, Silvio Taschieri1,2, Roberto Weinstein1,2, Massimo Del Fabbro1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present systematic review of the literature was to evaluate biomaterials performances considering new bone formation estimated through histomorphometric analysis of bone biopsies from human subjects after maxillary sinus floor elevation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic and manual search was performed to retrieve articles showing histomorphometric data of bone biopsies performed after sinus floor elevation surgery. Recorded data were statistically analyzed evaluating percentage of new bone volume, residual biomaterial, and connective/soft tissues in the biopsies. A meta-analysis of comparative studies was also performed.
RESULTS: After article selection process, 84 articles were included in the quantitative synthesis and 16 of them in the meta-analysis of comparative studies. The use of autogenous bone (AB) alone led to a significantly higher new bone formation if compared with bovine bone (BB) alone (P = 0.04), while no significant difference was found when the latter was compared with a mixture of AB and BB (P = 0.52). Grafts composed of BB showed significantly greater new bone formation as compared to hydroxyapatite (HA) (P < 0.001) while a mixture of tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and HA achieved better outcomes than BB (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on histomorphometric evaluation, AB should still be taken into consideration when the highest possible new bone formation is the primary aim in maxillary sinus surgery. When donor site morbidity is a concern, BB and a mixture of TCP and HA could be considered as predictable, showing promising results. More comparative histologic studies are needed to confirm such results.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomaterials; bone regeneration; guided tissue regeneration; sinus floor elevation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26452326     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  25 in total

1.  Sinus mucosa thinning and perforation after sinus augmentation. A histological study in rabbits.

Authors:  Shingo Kato; Daniele Botticelli; Enzo De Santis; Masatsugu Kanayama; Sabrina Ferreira; Idelmo Rangel-Garcia
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-02-04

2.  The effect of anatomy on osteogenesis after maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a radiographic and histological analysis.

Authors:  Wenjie Zhou; Feng Wang; Marko Magic; Minjie Zhuang; Jian Sun; Yiqun Wu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Radiographic Analysis of Graft Dimensional Changes in Transcrestal Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Luca Comuzzi; Margherita Tumedei; Adriano Piattelli; Gianluca Tartaglia; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Histomorphometric evaluation of different graft associations for maxillary sinus elevation in wide antral cavities: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Mauricio Marcelo Harlos; Thiago Bezerra da Silva; Pedro Giorgetti Montagner; Lucas Novaes Teixeira; Adriana Vanderley Gomes; Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 5.  Relative performance of various biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bálint Trimmel; Noémi Gede; Péter Hegyi; Zsolt Szakács; Gyöngyi Anna Mezey; Eszter Varga; Márton Kivovics; Lilla Hanák; Zoltán Rumbus; György Szabó
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 6.  Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: a Review of Selected Treatment Modalities.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Janek Dalsgaard Jensen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2017-09-30

7.  Comparison of Two Xenograft Materials Used in Sinus Lift Procedures: Material Characterization and In Vivo Behavior.

Authors:  María Piedad Ramírez Fernández; Patricia Mazón; Sergio A Gehrke; Jose Luis Calvo-Guirado; Piedad N De Aza
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Autologous Deciduous Tooth-Derived Material for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Clinical and Histological Case Report.

Authors:  Elio Minetti; Silvio Taschieri; Stefano Corbella
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2020-06-18

9.  Clinical Outcome of Dental Implants after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with and without Bone Grafting: A Retrospective Evaluation.

Authors:  Gianluca Martino Tartaglia; Pier Paolo Poli; Stephen Thaddeus Connelly; Carlo Maiorana; Davide Farronato; Silvio Taschieri
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Osteoconductivity of Bovine Xenograft Granules of Different Sizes in Sinus Lift: A Histomorphometric Study in Rabbits.

Authors:  Eduardo Pires Godoy; Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman; Daniele Botticelli; Andrea Amaroli; Vitor Ferreira Balan; Erick Ricardo Silva; Samuel Porfirio Xavier
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.