Literature DB >> 17918032

PhySIC: a veto supertree method with desirable properties.

Vincent Ranwez1, Vincent Berry, Alexis Criscuolo, Pierre-Henri Fabre, Sylvain Guillemot, Celine Scornavacca, Emmanuel J P Douzery.   

Abstract

This paper focuses on veto supertree methods; i.e., methods that aim at producing a conservative synthesis of the relationships agreed upon by all source trees. We propose desirable properties that a supertree should satisfy in this framework, namely the non-contradiction property (PC) and the induction property (PI). The former requires that the supertree does not contain relationships that contradict one or a combination of the source topologies, whereas the latter requires that all topological information contained in the supertree is present in a source tree or collectively induced by several source trees. We provide simple examples to illustrate their relevance and that allow a comparison with previously advocated properties. We show that these properties can be checked in polynomial time for any given rooted supertree. Moreover, we introduce the PhySIC method (PHYlogenetic Signal with Induction and non-Contradiction). For k input trees spanning a set of n taxa, this method produces a supertree that satisfies the above-mentioned properties in O(kn(3) + n(4)) computing time. The polytomies of the produced supertree are also tagged by labels indicating areas of conflict as well as those with insufficient overlap. As a whole, PhySIC enables the user to quickly summarize consensual information of a set of trees and localize groups of taxa for which the data require consolidation. Lastly, we illustrate the behaviour of PhySIC on primate data sets of various sizes, and propose a supertree covering 95% of all primate extant genera. The PhySIC algorithm is available at http://atgc.lirmm.fr/cgi-bin/PhySIC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17918032     DOI: 10.1080/10635150701639754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  9 in total

1.  Properties of consensus methods for inferring species trees from gene trees.

Authors:  James H Degnan; Michael DeGiorgio; David Bryant; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 15.683

2.  Trinets encode tree-child and level-2 phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Leo van Iersel; Vincent Moulton
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Constructing majority-rule supertrees.

Authors:  Jianrong Dong; David Fernández-Baca; F R McMorris
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 1.405

4.  Reconstructing a SuperGeneTree minimizing reconciliation.

Authors:  Manuel Lafond; Aïda Ouangraoua; Nadia El-Mabrouk
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  An experimental study of Quartets MaxCut and other supertree methods.

Authors:  M Shel Swenson; Rahul Suri; C Randal Linder; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 1.405

6.  Polynomial supertree methods revisited.

Authors:  Malte Brinkmeyer; Thasso Griebel; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  Adv Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-12-21

7.  MRL and SuperFine+MRL: new supertree methods.

Authors:  Nam Nguyen; Siavash Mirarab; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.405

8.  PhySIC_IST: cleaning source trees to infer more informative supertrees.

Authors:  Celine Scornavacca; Vincent Berry; Vincent Lefort; Emmanuel J P Douzery; Vincent Ranwez
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Reweaving the tapestry: a supertree of birds.

Authors:  Katie E Davis; Roderic D M Page
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2014-06-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.