Literature DB >> 26450694

Slow and fast orthodontic tooth movement: an experimental study on humans.

Catherine Giannopoulou1, Alexander Dudic2, Nikolaos Pandis3, Stavros Kiliaridis4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate the variation in the amount of the orthodontically induced tooth movement in humans and potential associations between the amount of tooth movement with age and location in the mandible or maxilla. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study included 11 participants (7 females, 4 males) with an age range of 11.3-28.6 years. In a standardized experimental orthodontic tooth movement protocol, two premolars of each participant were moved buccally during 8 weeks with the use of 1 N force. No functional or localized obstacles were affecting the displacement. Plaster models before and after the experimental tooth movement were constructed, digitized, and superimposed, to evaluate the amount of tooth movement of each tooth. Random effects linear regression analysis was performed to examine associations between tooth displacement, age, and tooth location.
RESULTS: The mean displacement of the teeth was 2.7±1.4mm. The range of tooth movement varied substantially between individuals (0.6-5.8mm). The displacement of the teeth within the same individual was highly correlated (R (2) = 0.78, P < 0.001). The tooth displacement decreased with age; however, this finding did not reach statistical significance (β = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.28, 0.05, P = 0.172). The tooth movement was higher in the maxilla than in the mandible (β = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.81, 0.86, P = 0.018).
CONCLUSION: Wide range of tooth displacement revealed slow and fast movers in this sample. Larger displacements were recorded in the maxilla compared to the mandible and in younger individuals.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26450694     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjv070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  9 in total

1.  Effect of piezocision on mandibular second molar protraction.

Authors:  Marwan M Al-Areqi; Elham S Abu Alhaija; Emad F Al-Maaitah
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Effects of Recent/Healed Post-Extraction Protocols on Incisor and Canine Alignment During Fixed Orthodontic Appliance Therapy.

Authors:  Adedayo Ayomide Olabintan; Olayinka Donald Otuyemi; Kikelomo Adebanke Kolawole
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-06

3.  Effect of micro osteo-perforations (MOP) on the rate of tooth movement and levels of interleukin- 1β - a split mouth study.

Authors:  Venkata Naidu Bavikati; Abdul Rasheed Muhameed; Nikitha Mohaley; Manjula K Thimmaiah; Keerthi Kavya Botlagunta; Sangamesh Basalingappa
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2022-01-31

4.  Relationship between different skeletal facial types and anterior alveolar bone thickness with cone-beam computed tomography in an Asian population.

Authors:  Baochao Li; Jialing Li; Huijuan Wang; Xiaoqiu Xie; Juan Wen; Huang Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

5.  A comparative assessment of the amount and rate of orthodontic space closure toward a healed vs recent lower premolar extraction site.

Authors:  Elham S Abu Alhaija; Rami A Al Shayeb; Susan Al-Khateeb; Hasan O Daher; Saba O Daher
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.684

Review 6.  Age effect on orthodontic tooth movement rate and the composition of gingival crevicular fluid : A literature review.

Authors:  Anne Schubert; Fabian Jäger; Jaap C Maltha; Theodosia N Bartzela
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Distribution of mandibular trabeculae bone volume fraction in relation to different MOP intervals for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  Ng Heng Khiang Teh; Saritha Sivarajan; Muhammad Khan Asif; Norliza Ibrahim; Mang Chek Wey
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Does the time-point of orthodontic space closure initiation after tooth extraction affect the incidence of gingival cleft development? A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Hemma Neuner; Antonia Meran; Michael H Bertl; Ilse Reich; Michael Nemec; Corinna Bruckmann; Andreas Stavropoulos; Hans-Peter Bantleon
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  Role of c-Fos in orthodontic tooth movement: an in vivo study using transgenic mice.

Authors:  Maximilian G Decker; Cita Nottmeier; Julia Luther; Anke Baranowsky; Bärbel Kahl-Nieke; Michael Amling; Thorsten Schinke; Jean-Pierre David; Till Koehne
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.