Literature DB >> 26450585

Psychometric evaluation of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR).

Julie Williams1, Mary Leamy2, Francesca Pesola2, Victoria Bird2, Clair Le Boutillier2, Mike Slade2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Supporting recovery is the aim of national mental health policy in many countries. However, only one measure of recovery has been developed in England: the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR), which measures recovery from the perspective of adult mental health service users with a psychosis diagnosis. AIMS: To independently evaluate the psychometric properties of the 15- and 22-item versions of the QPR.
METHOD: Two samples were used: data-set 1 (n = 88) involved assessment of the QPR at baseline, 2 weeks and 3 months. Data-set 2 (n = 399; trial registration: ISRCTN02507940) involved assessment of the QPR at baseline and 1 year.
RESULTS: For the 15-item version, internal consistency was 0.89, convergent validity was 0.73, test-retest reliability was 0.74 and sensitivity to change was 0.40. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the 15-item version offered a good fit. For the 22-item version, the interpersonal subscale was found to underperform and the intrapersonal subscale overlaps substantially with the 15-item version.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the 15-item and the intrapersonal subscale of the 22-item versions of the QPR demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The 15-item version is slightly more robust and also less burdensome, so it can be recommended for use in research and clinical practice. © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26450585     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.161695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  14 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Changes in Community Ability and Recovery After Psychiatric Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Bhing-Leet Tan; Wai-Yee Ng; Jayson Sudhasan; Thomas Chng; Irene Mok; Jimmy Lee
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2018-02-26

2.  Defining Occupational Competence and Occupational Identity in the Context of Recovery in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Bhing-Leet Tan; Madeline Wei Zhen Lim; Huiting Xie; Ziqiang Li; Jimmy Lee
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug

3.  Randomised controlled trial of a digitally assisted low intensity intervention to promote personal recovery in persisting psychosis: SMART-Therapy study protocol.

Authors:  Neil Thomas; John Farhall; Fiona Foley; Susan L Rossell; David Castle; Emma Ladd; Denny Meyer; Cathrine Mihalopoulos; Nuwan Leitan; Cassy Nunan; Rosalie Frankish; Tara Smark; Sue Farnan; Bronte McLeod; Leon Sterling; Greg Murray; Ellie Fossey; Lisa Brophy; Michael Kyrios
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Recovery and decision-making involvement in people with severe mental illness from six countries: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Sabine Loos; Eleanor Clarke; Harriet Jordan; Bernd Puschner; Andrea Fiorillo; Mario Luciano; Tibor Ivánka; Erzsébet Magyar; Malene Krogsgaard-Bording; Helle Østermark-Sørensen; Wulf Rössler; Wolfram Kawohl; Benjamin Mayer; Mike Slade
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Process and outcomes evaluation of a pre-academic arts program for individuals with mental health conditions: a mixed methods study protocol.

Authors:  Maayan Salomon-Gimmon; Hod Orkibi; Cochavit Elefant
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Psychometric properties and utility of the Responses to Positive Affect questionnaire (RPA) in a sample of people with bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Jannis T Kraiss; Peter M Ten Klooster; Melissa Chrispijn; Anja W M M Stevens; Ralph W Kupka; Ernst T Bohlmeijer
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  2019-06-25

7.  An Asian study on clinical and psychological factors associated with personal recovery in people with psychosis.

Authors:  Madeline Lim; Ziqiang Li; Huiting Xie; Bhing Leet Tan; Jimmy Lee
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing.

Authors:  Akiko Kanehara; Risa Kotake; Yuki Miyamoto; Yousuke Kumakura; Kentaro Morita; Tomoko Ishiura; Kimiko Shimizu; Yumiko Fujieda; Shuntaro Ando; Shinsuke Kondo; Kiyoto Kasai
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  A combined individual and group-based stabilization and skill training intervention versus treatment as usual for patients with long lasting posttraumatic reactions receiving outpatient treatment in specialized mental health care - a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K H Holgersen; I Brønstad; M Jensen; H Brattland; S K Reitan; A M Hassel; M Arentz; M Lara-Cabrera; A E Skjervold
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  B-positive: a randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent positive psychology intervention for euthymic patients with bipolar disorder - study protocol and intervention development.

Authors:  Jannis T Kraiss; Peter M Ten Klooster; Melissa Chrispijn; Hester R Trompetter; Anja W M M Stevens; Erica Neutel; Ralph W Kupka; Ernst T Bohlmeijer
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.