Nada O F Kassem1, Sheila R Jackson2, Marie Boman-Davis3, Noura O Kassem2, Sandy Liles2, Reem M Daffa2, Roxana Yasmin2, Hala Madanat4, Melbourne F Hovell2. 1. Center for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health (CBEACH), San Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA. nadakassem@hotmail.com. 2. Center for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health (CBEACH), San Diego State University Research Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA. 3. National University, San Diego, CA, USA. 4. Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine hookah tobacco use, hookah lounge attendance, and facilitators and barriers to hookah lounge attendance. METHODS: A cross-sectional Web-based survey of a random sample of 1332 undergraduate students (Mean Age = 21.2 years) attending a United States university. RESULTS: The majority of respondents (72.8%) had ever smoked hookah tobacco, and 28% of those had ever smoked during adolescence. The majority of ever hookah smokers (81.5%) and a portion of never hookah smokers (20%) had ever been to a hookah lounge. The adjusted odds of ever visiting a hookah lounge were 2.1 times higher among participants who reported that the closest hookah lounge to the university was < 5 miles away than those who reported that the closest hookah lounge was ≥ 5 miles away. Facilitators of visiting hookah lounges included friends and close proximity of hookah lounges to campus; barriers included cost of smoking hookah, crowded lounges, and having to be 18 years old. CONCLUSION: Youth are vulnerable to experimenting with hookah tobacco smoking. Hookah lounges provide patrons the opportunity to smoke hookah tobacco with smoker and non-smoker friends in entertaining settings. Our findings suggest that zoning laws and anti-hookah smoking legislation may help curb hookah uptake by prohibiting hookah lounges from opening in close proximity to universities, reducing the density of hookah lounges in cities, and raising the admission age for hookah lounges to 21 years.
OBJECTIVE: To examine hookah tobacco use, hookah lounge attendance, and facilitators and barriers to hookah lounge attendance. METHODS: A cross-sectional Web-based survey of a random sample of 1332 undergraduate students (Mean Age = 21.2 years) attending a United States university. RESULTS: The majority of respondents (72.8%) had ever smoked hookah tobacco, and 28% of those had ever smoked during adolescence. The majority of ever hookah smokers (81.5%) and a portion of never hookah smokers (20%) had ever been to a hookah lounge. The adjusted odds of ever visiting a hookah lounge were 2.1 times higher among participants who reported that the closest hookah lounge to the university was < 5 miles away than those who reported that the closest hookah lounge was ≥ 5 miles away. Facilitators of visiting hookah lounges included friends and close proximity of hookah lounges to campus; barriers included cost of smoking hookah, crowded lounges, and having to be 18 years old. CONCLUSION: Youth are vulnerable to experimenting with hookah tobacco smoking. Hookah lounges provide patrons the opportunity to smoke hookah tobacco with smoker and non-smoker friends in entertaining settings. Our findings suggest that zoning laws and anti-hookah smoking legislation may help curb hookah uptake by prohibiting hookah lounges from opening in close proximity to universities, reducing the density of hookah lounges in cities, and raising the admission age for hookah lounges to 21 years.
Authors: Brian A Primack; Kristen R Rice; Ariel Shensa; Mary V Carroll; Erica J DePenna; Rima Nakkash; Tracey E Barnett Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Nada O F Kassem; Noura O Kassem; Sheila R Jackson; Sandy Liles; Reem M Daffa; Adam T Zarth; Maram A Younis; Steven G Carmella; C Richard Hofstetter; Dale A Chatfield; Georg E Matt; Stephen S Hecht; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Peyton Jacob; Ahmad H Abu Raddaha; Delia Dempsey; Christopher Havel; Margaret Peng; Lisa Yu; Neal L Benowitz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Gideon St Helen; Neal L Benowitz; Katherine M Dains; Christopher Havel; Margaret Peng; Peyton Jacob Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: René A Arrazola; Linda J Neff; Sara M Kennedy; Enver Holder-Hayes; Christopher D Jones Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Adriana Pérez; Arnold E Kuk; Meagan A Bluestein; Melissa B Harrell; Cheryl L Perry; Baojiang Chen Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Nada O F Kassem; Noura O Kassem; Sandy Liles; Sheila R Jackson; Dale A Chatfield; Peyton Jacob; Neal L Benowitz; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Nada Of Kassem; Noura O Kassem; Sandy Liles; Erin Reilly; Flora Kas-Petrus; Alexander Ivan B Posis; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-07-20 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Nada O F Kassem; Sheila R Jackson; Noura O Kassem; Sandy Liles; Alexander Ivan B Posis; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2019-01-01
Authors: Jessica L King; Kimberly G Wagoner; Cynthia K Suerken; Eunyoung Y Song; Beth A Reboussin; John Spangler; Stephannie Walker; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Mark Wolfson; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Kathleen R Case; MeLisa R Creamer; Maria R Cooper; Alexandra Loukas; Cheryl L Perry Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-06-30 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Nada O F Kassem; Noura O Kassem; Sandy Liles; Adam T Zarth; Sheila R Jackson; Reem M Daffa; Dale A Chatfield; Steven G Carmella; Stephen S Hecht; Melbourne F Hovell Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 4.244