Literature DB >> 26450410

Australian national birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age for twins, 2001-2010.

Zhuoyang Li1,2, Mark P Umstad3,4, Lisa Hilder5, Fenglian Xu6, Elizabeth A Sullivan7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Birthweight remains one of the strongest predictors of perinatal mortality and disability. Birthweight percentiles form a reference that allows the detection of neonates at higher risk of neonatal and postneonatal morbidity. The aim of the study is to present updated national birthweight percentiles by gestational age for male and female twins born in Australia.
METHODS: Population data were extracted from the Australian National Perinatal Data Collection for twins born in Australia between 2001 and 2010. A total of 43,833 women gave birth to 87,666 twins in Australia which were included in the study analysis. Implausible birthweights were excluded using Tukey's methodology based on the interquartile range. Univariate analysis was used to examine the birthweight percentiles for liveborn twins born between 20 and 42 weeks gestation.
RESULTS: Birthweight percentiles by gestational age were calculated for 85,925 live births (43,153 males and 42,706 females). Of these infants, 53.6% were born preterm (birth before 37 completed weeks of gestation) while 50.2% were low birthweight (<2500 g) and 8.7% were very low birthweight (<1500 g). The mean birthweight decreased from 2462 g in 2001 to 2440 g in 2010 for male twins, compared with 2485 g in 1991-94. For female twins, the mean birthweight decreased from 2375 g in 2001 to 2338 g in 2010, compared with 2382 g in 1991-94.
CONCLUSIONS: The birthweight percentiles provide clinicians and researchers with up-to-date population norms of birthweight percentiles for twins in Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26450410      PMCID: PMC4599725          DOI: 10.1186/s12887-015-0464-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pediatr        ISSN: 1471-2431            Impact factor:   2.125


Background

Birthweight remains one of the strongest predictors of perinatal mortality and disability [1, 2]. Birthweight percentiles form a reference that incorporates weight and gestational age of infants at birth and are used as an adjunct for detecting neonates with suspected intra-uterine growth impairment and those at higher risk of neonatal and postneonatal morbidity. Twin births account for about 3 % of all births in Australia but make a significantly greater contribution to perinatal morbidity and mortality than singleton births [3]. Australia’s first birthweight percentiles for twin births based on national population data were published in 1999 using live twins born during 1991–94 [4]. Marked socio-demographic changes in maternal characteristics and clinical practice have occurred during the period since this publication including increased maternal age, reduced smoking rate, and increased usage of assisted reproductive technology [2]. The aim of the study is to present updated national birthweight percentiles for all male and female liveborn twins born in Australia over the 10-year period between 2001 and 2010.

Methods

Population-based data on twins born in Australia between January 2001 and December 2010 were obtained from Australian Institute of Health and Welfare National Perinatal Data Collection (NPDC). The NPDC is a national collation of jurisdictional population-based cross sectional data collections of pregnancy, childbirth and perinatal outcomes. Information is included in the NPDC on both live births and stillbirths of at least 400 g birthweight or at least 20 weeks gestation. Records with missing birthweight, infant sex or gestational age values were excluded from calculating the birthweight-by-gestation percentiles. In addition, records with implausible birthweight were identified using Tukey’s methodology [5] based on the interquartile range. Birthweights for each sex and gestational age combination that fell below the first quartile minus twice the interquartile range (lower Tukey limit) or above the third quartile plus twice the interquartile range (higher Tukey limit) were considered outliers and were excluded from the analyses. Level of remoteness was based on the geographical location of the usual residence of the mother, and was classified into five groups: major cities of Australia, inner regional Australia, outer regional Australia, remote Australia and very remote Australia. Univariate analysis was used to examine the birthweight distributions and to determine the interquartile range for each gestational age for twins born in Australia. After removing outliers exact percentiles of birthweight in grams were calculated for each gestational week between 20 and 42 weeks. Results for the 5th and 95th percentile are presented only for gestational ages with a minimum of 100 records and the 10th and 90th percentile are plotted only for gestational ages with a minimum of 50 records, to be consistent with previously published Australian birthweight percentiles [2, 4]. Student t-test was used to examine the mean birthweight difference between twins born in 1991–94 and 2010. General linear model was used to investigate the trends for mean birthweight for male and female twins born between 2001 and 2010. All analyses were carried out using SAS for Windows, version 9.3 (SAS Inc, Cary, NC). Ethics approval for this study was granted by the Human Research Ethics Advisory Panel of the University of New South Wale, Australia (Reference number: 2013-7-07) and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Ethics Committee (Reference number: EO 2013/2/17). As secondary data analysis of de-identified data set, additional consent from participants was not required. Approval for use of data was provided by all states and territories.

Results

Between 2001 and 2010, a total of 43,833 women gave birth to 87,666 twins in Australia. Table 1 presents the maternal demographic and obstetric characteristics of these women. 1741 (2.0 %) births (1737 stillbirths and 4 births with unknown vital status at birth) were not considered further.
Table 1

Maternal characteristics of women who gave birth to twins, Australia, 2001-2010

Maternal characteristicsNumber & percentage
Total43,833 (100.0 %)
Maternal age (years)
   < 20873 (2.0 %)
  20-244076 (9.3 %)
  25-2910,468 (23.9 %)
  30-3415,944 (36.4 %)
  35-3910,412 (23.8 %)
   > =402055 (4.7 %)
  Not stated5 (0.0 %)
Parity
  Primiparas17,971 (43.3 %)
  Multiparas23,466 (56.6 %)
  Not stated37 (0.1 %)
Country of birth
  Australia31,682 (72.3 %)
  Overseas11,944 (27.2 %)
  Not stated207 (0.5 %)
Smoking during pregnancy
  Yes4271 (13.9 %)
  No25,968 (84.7 %)
  Not stated420 (1.4 %)
Remoteness
  Major Cities30,579 (69.8 %)
  Inner Regional8136 (18.6 %)
  Outer Regional3959 (9.0 %)
  Remote738 (1.7 %)
  Very remote367 (0.8 %)
  Not stated17 (0.0 %)
Maternal characteristics of women who gave birth to twins, Australia, 2001-2010 Among the 85,925 live births (43,153 males and 42,706 females), 53.6 % were born preterm (birth before 37 completed weeks of gestation) while 50.2 % were low birthweight (<2500 g) and 8.7 % were very low birthweight (<1500 g) (Table 2). More than half of liveborn twins were admitted to a special care nursery or neonatal intensive care unit (58.6 %) or required some type of active resuscitation measures (54.0 %) (Table 2). The median length of stay in hospital for twins was 6 days (interquartile range: 5 – 13 days). The 121 (0.1 %) records missing one or more of the key variables (sex, birthweight and gestational age), and 134 (0.2 %) lower Tukey limit and 207 (0.2 %) higher Tukey limit outliers were excluded. Percentiles were calculated for the remaining 85,436 infants.
Table 2

Live twin births, Australia, 2001-2010

Infant characteristicsNumber & percentage
Total85,925 (100.0 %)
Sex
  Male43,153 (50.2 %)
  Female42,706 (49.7 %)
  Not stated66 (0.1 %)
Birthweight (g)
   < 15007461 (8.7 %)
  1500-249935,689 (41.5 %)
  2500-299930,403 (35.4 %)
  3000-399912,262 (14.3 %)
   > =400068 (0.1 %)
  Not stated42 (0.0 %)
Gestational age (weeks)
  20-272845 (3.3 %)
  28-315501 (6.4 %)
  32-3637,745 (43.9 %)
  37-4139,792 (46.3 %)
   > =4226 (0.0 %)
  Not stated16 (0.0 %)
Presentation
  Vertex58,727 (68.3 %)
  Breech23,605 (27.5 %)
  Other2566 (3.0 %)
  Not stated1027 (1.2 %)
Apgar score at 5 minutes
  0-31124 (1.3 %)
  4-61810 (2.1 %)
  7-1082,849 (96.4 %)
  Not stated142 (0.2 %)
Resuscitation
  Yes46,427 (54.0 %)
  No34,581 (40.2 %)
  Not stated4917 (5.7 %)
Admission to NICU
  Yes47,674 (58.6 %)
  No33,370 (41.0 %)
  Not stated278 (0.3 %)
Length of stay
  Less than 1 day2645 (3.1 %)
  1 day1502 (1.7 %)
  2 day2582 (3.0 %)
  3 day5102 (5.9 %)
  4 day9289 (10.8 %)
  5 day12,231 (14.2 %)
  6 day9704 (11.3 %)
  7-13 days21,520 (25.0 %)
  14-20 days9138 (10.6 %)
  21-27 days4858 (5.7 %)
  28 or more days7204 (8.4 %)
  Not stated150 (0.2 %)
Live twin births, Australia, 2001-2010 Figure 1 shows birthweight percentiles by gestational age for liveborn twins by infant sex; exact birthweight percentiles are shown in Table 3 and Table 4. The mean birthweight slightly decreased from 2462 g in 2001 to 2440 g in 2010 for male twins (p = 0.49). For female twins, the mean birthweight significantly decreased from 2375 g in 2001 to 2338 g in 2010 (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2). Compared with twins born in Australian 1991–94, the mean birthweight was significantly lower for twins born in 2010 for both male (2485 g versus 2440 g, p < 0.001) and female (2382 g versus 2338 g, p < 0.001).
Fig. 1

Birthweight percentiles for liveborn twins, by sex, Australia, 2001–2010

Table 3

Birthweight percentiles for male liveborn twins, Australia, 2001-2010

Gestation (weeks)No. of birthsMean (g)Standard deviationBirthweight percentile (g)
p3p5p10p25p50p75p90p95p97
204233850...300340369...
219040273..320355400450495..
2213149572320350400450510540580600620
2316656077400440470505560610650695718
2421666696477490525617673724784820840
25234760114510540610695760840900940968
26297883161555610686775880986108011561205
27323101016161671680491210191116120012701300
284781153201720780890103011601290141014501505
2956312972197578751000118013271450154516251660
3072014532469309911128131414771600175518501928
3110591628255112011721285147016321790194220602120
3216381784292118012751400159617991972215522452316
3320401999304141014691590181520102200237024862555
3434082179328153016181760197021802400260027042780
3545032382340175518301950215523802600281029503040
3673192589359191019952135235025952820304431853280
37106652768355210021902315253027653000321533563470
3876012901357224023202450266528943130336535103620
3911292982364226024152538273029803220346036003695
403083031427227523302470274330403275360037903960
41253199558...280530153500...
4282969459...250029803400...
Table 4

Birthweight percentiles for female liveborn twins, Australia, 2001-2010

Gestation (weeks)No. of birthsMean (g)Standard deviationBirthweight percentile (g)
p3p5p10p25p50p75p90p95p97
204929957...260296330...
219437458..300340370415450..
2210745975300330350420460508545570580
2314351783325350405470520570620640650
2417663587425480530589638700731751780
25167728113520547580656730800878907920
26241845141525580660760864930100010521090
273089511865505987108409831060118012401290
28384109016974579587099111121200128013451365
295421219211750808930110112351360146515361601
3069713552448508961010121013751530165517251760
319901551239103011051227141515681700183319301990
3216181713262118212481365155017301880202021402220
3320371895288132014001530171319002086225023602430
3433222085308148215551685188520902292248025702635
3545582267324164017151850206022702480267027902875
3671452464339182519052035224024602680290030303130
37106952656340202021002225243026502880309032303326
3877202774339214522302349254527652990321533503435
3911542884373218522802420263028753140336035003570
403202958438211021802368266830003240351836533800
41222976322...279529333220...
42113001497...254029103440...
Fig. 2

Mean birthweight of liveborn twins, by sex, Australia, 2001–2010

Birthweight percentiles for liveborn twins, by sex, Australia, 2001–2010 Birthweight percentiles for male liveborn twins, Australia, 2001-2010 Birthweight percentiles for female liveborn twins, Australia, 2001-2010 Mean birthweight of liveborn twins, by sex, Australia, 2001–2010

Discussion

We developed the contemporary population-based birthweight percentile charts to provide an up-to-date reference for twins born in Australia. Growth in twin pregnancies slows progressively from around 32 weeks until term [6]. When comparing the dataset in this study with a singleton population from a similar time period [2] this phenomenon is confirmed. The median gestation-specific birthweight for twins were remarkably similar to those for singletons from a similar era until around 32 weeks gestation. The difference then becomes progressively more pronounced, reaching 640 g for males and 480 g for females at 40 weeks. It has been postulated that this slowing of growth late in a multiple pregnancy is a physiologically adaptive process that favours developmental maturity at the expense of fetal size [6]. However, there is a limit to this physiological adaptation and eventually the growth restriction becomes a pathological process. This is evidenced by studies consistently highlighting the risks of late fetal death in twins, particularly in relation to growth restriction [7-9]. Twin pregnancies have an increased risk of adverse outcome compared to single pregnancies. The increase in perinatal mortality and morbidity is primarily related to preterm delivery, complications of monochorionicity, and fetal growth restriction. Accurate population data is required to accurately diagnose growth restriction in twin pregnancies. Secular trends for a decrease in the overall mean birthweight for liveborn twins were observed for both male and females in Australia in the study period. In contrast the mean birthweight for liveborn singletons in Australia from a similar time period has been relatively stable [2]. The observed decline in the mean birthweight for twins over time was partially explained by the downward shift in the distribution of gestational age. The mean gestational age was 35.4 weeks for twins in 2001, compared with 35.1 weeks in 2010 [10, 11]. Preterm birth occurred in 51.2 % of twins in 2001 and 56.7 % in 2010 [10, 11]. This decreased mean gestational age and increased pre-term births rate among twins might be attributed to improved intrapartum survival at earlier gestations, earlier obstetric interventions and increased usage of assisted reproductive technology [12, 13]. Population-based birthweight percentile charts for twins are scarce [14-17]. When comparing Australian birthweight percentile charts with others, significant differences in birth size are observed between populations. At 40 weeks gestation, the mean birthweight of Australian live born twins are markedly lower than Norwegian and Finnish counterparts [15, 17] but the median birthweight of Australian twins are heavier than Canadian and Japanese twins [14, 16]. Sankilampi et al. has stated that the differences in term birth size is largely associated with differences in genetic background rather than maternal nutrition or healthcare as this is comparable between these developed countries [17]. There is inherent appeal in the customisation of growth charts that incorporate maternal weight, height, ethnicity as well as plurality. The intent is to identify fetuses that are small as a consequence of growth restriction rather than constitutionally small for clinical decision-making. Several large observational studies have suggested that customised charts improve the identification of infants with intrauterine growth restriction compared with population based charts, although contrasting opinions exist [18-22]. Birthweight centiles provide a population reference describing fetal growth in the population rather than a standard for assessing individual growth [23]. They also provide the basis for characterising newborn size for longitudinal studies of childhood outcomes. The usefulness of customised birthweight percentiles has been debated. The value of plurality-specific centiles has been established but the literature remains divided on the benefits of customisation for other characteristics and the need for multiple reference charts [24]. Maternal height and weight have been included in the NPDC from 2010, but agreed national standards have not yet been implemented. Further studies are required to examine whether customised growth charts adjusted for maternal size and ethnicity contributes to improved prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes. The provision of these updated birthweight percentile charts allows clinicians and researchers to re-evaluate the success of pregnancy management by determining the rate of detection of growth restriction. As previously described, growth restriction is the major cause of late fetal death in twin pregnancies and its accurate diagnosis a focal point of good obstetric care. One limitation of this study is that birthweight percentile charts do not measure intrauterine growth but rather size at birth. The birthweight of babies born prematurely is likely to be influenced by the pathological process leading to preterm birth and therefore likely to differ from those remaining in utero until term [25, 26]. It has been argued that the preterm births should be assessed using estimated fetal weight rather than birthweight percentile charts as preterm neonates are disproportionately affected by the fetal growth restriction [25]. However, the accuracy of estimated fetal weight is limited by the ability of obtaining accurate measurements included within the computation of estimated fetal weight and the formula used for computation [26, 27]. To date, there has been no Australian chart published for sonographic standards for estimated fetal weight and the Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine’s position is that ‘No formula for estimating fetal weight has achieved an accuracy which enables us to recommend its use’ [27, 28]. In such cases, the population-based birthweight percentile charts presented in this study provide a valuable reference for clinicians and researchers assessing the prognosis of twins in Australia.

Conclusions

This study presents the up-to-date national population-based birthweight percentile charts for male and female live born twins in Australia. These new charts provide a valuable reference for clinicians and researchers correctly identifying high-risk twins in Australia.
  21 in total

1.  Birthweight percentiles by gestational age in multiple births. A population-based study of Norwegian twins and triplets.

Authors:  S V Glinianaia; R Skjaerven; P Magnus
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Preterm birth in twins after subfertility treatment: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Hans Verstraelen; Sylvie Goetgeluk; Catherine Derom; Stijn Vansteelandt; Robert Derom; Els Goetghebeur; Marleen Temmerman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-25

3.  Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study.

Authors:  K E A Hack; J B Derks; S G Elias; A Franx; E J Roos; S K Voerman; C L Bode; C Koopman-Esseboom; G H A Visser
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  New population-based references for birth weight, length, and head circumference in singletons and twins from 23 to 43 gestation weeks.

Authors:  Ulla Sankilampi; Marja-Leena Hannila; Antti Saari; Mika Gissler; Leo Dunkel
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.709

5.  Customised birthweight percentiles: does adjusting for maternal characteristics matter?

Authors:  J A Hutcheon; X Zhang; S Cnattingius; M S Kramer; R W Platt
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Australian national birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Timothy A Dobbins; Elizabeth A Sullivan; Christine L Roberts; Judy M Simpson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  The risk of stillbirth and infant death by each additional week of expectant management in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Jessica M Page; Rachel A Pilliod; Jonathan M Snowden; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Trends in the distribution of gestational age and contribution of planned births in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Natasha Nassar; Michal Schiff; Christine L Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An outcome-based approach for the creation of fetal growth standards: do singletons and twins need separate standards?

Authors:  K S Joseph; John Fahey; Robert W Platt; Robert M Liston; Shoo K Lee; Reg Sauve; Shiliang Liu; Alexander C Allen; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Reference birthweight range for multiple birth neonates in Japan.

Authors:  Noriko Kato
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  9 in total

1.  Determinants of Perinatal Outcomes in Dialyzed and Transplanted Women in Australia.

Authors:  Erandi Hewawasam; Christopher E Davies; Zhuoyang Li; Philip Clayton; Elizabeth Sullivan; Stephen P McDonald; Shilpanjali Jesudason
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-03-23

2.  Reference curves of birth weight, length, and head circumference for gestational ages in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Authors:  Ekawaty L Haksari; Harrie N Lafeber; Mohammad Hakimi; Endy P Pawirohartono; Lennarth Nyström
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.125

3.  Birth size and gestational age in opposite-sex twins as compared to same-sex twins: An individual-based pooled analysis of 21 cohorts.

Authors:  Aline Jelenkovic; Reijo Sund; Yoshie Yokoyama; Yoon-Mi Hur; Vilhelmina Ullemar; Catarina Almqvist; Patrik Ke Magnusson; Gonneke Willemsen; Meike Bartels; Catharina Em van Beijsterveldt; Leonie H Bogl; Kirsi H Pietiläinen; Eero Vuoksimaa; Fuling Ji; Feng Ning; Zengchang Pang; Tracy L Nelson; Keith E Whitfield; Esther Rebato; Clare H Llewellyn; Abigail Fisher; Gombojav Bayasgalan; Danshiitsoodol Narandalai; Morten Bjerregaard-Andersen; Henning Beck-Nielsen; Morten Sodemann; Adam D Tarnoki; David L Tarnoki; Syuichi Ooki; Maria A Stazi; Corrado Fagnani; Sonia Brescianini; Lise Dubois; Michel Boivin; Mara Brendgen; Ginette Dionne; Frank Vitaro; Tessa L Cutler; John L Hopper; Robert F Krueger; Matt McGue; Shandell Pahlen; Jeffrey M Craig; Richard Saffery; Claire Ma Haworth; Robert Plomin; Ariel Knafo-Noam; David Mankuta; Lior Abramson; S Alexandra Burt; Kelly L Klump; Robert F Vlietinck; Catherine A Derom; Ruth Jf Loos; Dorret I Boomsma; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Jaakko Kaprio; Karri Silventoinen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Birth weight percentiles by sex and gestational age for twins born in southern China.

Authors:  Huazhang Miao; Fei Yao; Yuntao Wu; Xiu Zhang; Rubi He; Bing Li; Qingguo Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Gestational breast cancer in New South Wales: A population-based linkage study of incidence, management, and outcomes.

Authors:  Nadom Safi; Christobel Saunders; Andrew Hayen; Antoinette Anazodo; Kei Lui; Zhuoyang Li; Marc Remond; Michael Nicholl; Alex Y Wang; Elizabeth Sullivan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Should singleton birth weight standards be applied to identify small-for-gestational age twins?: analysis of a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dongxin Lin; Jiaming Rao; Dazhi Fan; Zheng Huang; Zixing Zhou; Gengdong Chen; Pengsheng Li; Xiafen Lu; Demei Lu; Huishan Zhang; Caihong Luo; Xiaoling Guo; Zhengping Liu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  New birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age in Southern China and its comparison with the INTERGROWTH-21st Standard.

Authors:  Fei Yao; Huazhang Miao; Bing Li; Yuntao Wu; Qingguo Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Fertility and Neonatal Outcomes of Freeze-All vs. Fresh Embryo Transfer in Women With Advanced Endometriosis.

Authors:  JIayi Wu; Xiaoyan Yang; Jiaan Huang; Yanping Kuang; Yun Wang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Short-Term Effects of Dexamethasone versus Betamethasone on Ultrasonic Measures of Fetal Well-Being: Cohort from a Blinded, Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Amanda Henry; Aditi Mahajan; Caroline A Crowther; Anne Lainchbury; Lynne Roberts; Antonia W Shand; Alec W Welsh
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.587

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.